Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A choice example of creepy Audrey’s emetic
> combination of malice and self-righteousness, for
> the enlightenment of those few who don’t already
> know what she is.

You are a psycho cyber stalker.

> What you did, Audrey Mulertt, was
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,34
> 7187,347929#msg-347929&v=t]try to start a
> rumour[/url] of a kind which can and has put lives
> in danger. You don’t get to say that doing so
> is alright.

Danger? Ya right, What a drama queen. Stop sniveling crybaby

> Audrey can’t even be honestly nasty. She has to
> pretend that her actions are “justified” by
> the terrible (but unspecified) things that I’ve
> done. When have I ever done anything which even
> comes near to being as vicious and irresponsible
> as what she did? Never, is the answer.
>
> The things she complains about now happened after
> her smear. Pretending that they in some way
> motivated her action is a lie.

You are a psycho stalker who follows people around from site to site for the sole evil purpose of harassment.

> It was Jon posted my address. Why isn’t Miss
> Moral Idiocy attacking him for this?

Liar

> Audrey reminds me of the anti-vivisectionists
> described by Haldane:
>
> [url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=KsnZoWIqU
> 9QC&pg=PA662&dq=%22a+less+respectable+side+to+the+
> anti-vivisectionist+mind%22+%22god+will+torture+ph
> ysiologists%22+%22soured+spinster%22]https://books
> .google.co.uk/books?id=KsnZoWIqU9QC&pg=PA662&dq=%2
> 2a+less+respectable+side+to+the+anti-vivisectionis
> t+mind%22+%22god+will+torture+physiologists%22+%22
> soured+spinster%22[/url]
>
> So apt is this as a character study that it
> predicts the characteristic fantasies:
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 52112,1056015#msg-1056015&v=t]http://grahamhancock
> .com/phorum/read.php?1,1052112,1056015#msg-1056015
> [/url]

You've got to be kidding. Did you impress yourself?

> What, actually, have I dished out, which comes
> even near to what’s routinely thrown at me?

For the lurkers following this BS, Stower's stalking and incessant harassment can be seen on Above Top Secret, Unexplained Mysteries and Google groups. And probably every alt who has written a book has had to put up with his harassment.
There was a drama here on this board back in 2001 when Bauval and Hancock were going to sue Stower. Because he's such a nice guy.

> > > Says you, projecting wildly again. Tell us
> what I
> > > have to be jealous of in your case,
> Audrey—or
> > > are you wrapping yourself in someone
> else’s?

Did I say you were jealous of me? NO I didn't. You're making stuff up

> This from someone who happily defames entire
> academic disciplines.

I don't rant on and on and on like you do mocking the degree they hold. I have a problem with their assumptions.

> Since when did holders of higher degrees become
> exalted beings who must not be mocked? In
> [u]this[/u] forum?

Apparently since you don't have one. No one else does it. Only the stalkers do it

> Then seek professional help.

Would that stop you from stalking?

> How long has Creighton been stalking me? How long
> have the pair of you?

Seriously dude, you're demented.

> Your not getting the allusion doesn’t make you
> clever, Audrey.

Oh I get it. YOU'RE A PSYCHO CYBER STALKER.