Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Hi Lover , Martin, Audrey and all
I found the satirical commentary witty & funny. However sometimes we need to realise at a deeper level there are real people behind the internet persona's. I think some awareness of that has become the unfortunately the main subject of discussion?
Some folk might truly have mental and physical disabilities?
I thought to carry on the twist by pretending to be the night janitor in the courthouse who rise to the witness stand with mop acting as faux microphone , but I am unlikely to do Lovers prose justice.
Instead:-
Surely if anything ALL ought realise that searching and posting private real details or accusations on a message board is stupid ridiculous childish behaviour.
The identity of Gilligan and the art expert cited in Creighton's book is obvious. There is no value dragging dirt and cheap shots into it.
Some might feel justified because of that citation. However we do not know how such citation was authorised.
eg Was it just an email asking to use the information offering a with thanks acknowledgement in a foreword or was it direct explicit communication to cite the name of the "art expert" in the body of the book?
Maybe only the Professor was asked and inadvertently provided the name?
On that score it ought be an obvious indictment on Creighton's shallow work that the expert independent warriors are clearly amateur internet chat site contributors with no hands on study of the writings or graffiti. He might as well have offered Mickey Mouse as an expert.
Main thing is: If someone appeals that real name might effect personal life or family then that is the time to stop the fun and consider more seriously!
We do not know whether the expert intended to give prominence to his real name in the book. Further if one has gone to trouble to hide real name on this forum then who knows....
eg He may teach art as a tutor and not wish his professional life peers or students to be linked to comments made on silly GHMB!
or
maybe someone potentially dangerous with a desire to harm recently released from jail and there is reason to keep location and identity and exposure on the internet hidden.
How about ALL grow up and behave like adults.
OH Audrey, you are not good at the barking insults, they are lame give it up. What Stower means by projection is .... what you are looking at (criticising) you are looking with ( do it guilty yourself).
You have tried to research me, linked me to several other accounts/posters even Loveritas, found out some stuff but detail was wrong! STOP IT! IT IS INSANE!
My real name is Steven Hart
fortunately anything you will find on me I am proud of and don't care!
However on here prefer to be called "Corp"
Kind regards to all
I found the satirical commentary witty & funny. However sometimes we need to realise at a deeper level there are real people behind the internet persona's. I think some awareness of that has become the unfortunately the main subject of discussion?
Some folk might truly have mental and physical disabilities?
I thought to carry on the twist by pretending to be the night janitor in the courthouse who rise to the witness stand with mop acting as faux microphone , but I am unlikely to do Lovers prose justice.
Instead:-
Surely if anything ALL ought realise that searching and posting private real details or accusations on a message board is stupid ridiculous childish behaviour.
The identity of Gilligan and the art expert cited in Creighton's book is obvious. There is no value dragging dirt and cheap shots into it.
Some might feel justified because of that citation. However we do not know how such citation was authorised.
eg Was it just an email asking to use the information offering a with thanks acknowledgement in a foreword or was it direct explicit communication to cite the name of the "art expert" in the body of the book?
Maybe only the Professor was asked and inadvertently provided the name?
On that score it ought be an obvious indictment on Creighton's shallow work that the expert independent warriors are clearly amateur internet chat site contributors with no hands on study of the writings or graffiti. He might as well have offered Mickey Mouse as an expert.
Main thing is: If someone appeals that real name might effect personal life or family then that is the time to stop the fun and consider more seriously!
We do not know whether the expert intended to give prominence to his real name in the book. Further if one has gone to trouble to hide real name on this forum then who knows....
eg He may teach art as a tutor and not wish his professional life peers or students to be linked to comments made on silly GHMB!
or
maybe someone potentially dangerous with a desire to harm recently released from jail and there is reason to keep location and identity and exposure on the internet hidden.
How about ALL grow up and behave like adults.
OH Audrey, you are not good at the barking insults, they are lame give it up. What Stower means by projection is .... what you are looking at (criticising) you are looking with ( do it guilty yourself).
You have tried to research me, linked me to several other accounts/posters even Loveritas, found out some stuff but detail was wrong! STOP IT! IT IS INSANE!
My real name is Steven Hart
fortunately anything you will find on me I am proud of and don't care!
However on here prefer to be called "Corp"
Kind regards to all
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.