> Martin Stower Wrote:
> > . . . says the creep who Googled my name and then
> > smeared me on this board as a convicted sex offender.
> I didn't say you WERE a sex offender, did I. I
> didn't post a link to anything. I didn't give your
> work history, where you lived or what you did for
> a living. I insulted you and you had it coming.
> Stop sniveling, here suck on this you little
A choice example of creepy Audrey’s emetic combination of malice and self-righteousness, for the enlightenment of those few who don’t already know what she is.
What you did, Audrey Mulertt, was try to start a rumour of a kind which can and has put lives in danger. You don’t get to say that doing so is alright.
Audrey can’t even be honestly nasty. She has to pretend that her actions are “justified” by the terrible (but unspecified) things that I’ve done. When have I ever done anything which even comes near to being as vicious and irresponsible as what she did? Never, is the answer.
The things she complains about now happened after her smear. Pretending that they in some way motivated her action is a lie.
Where did I give anyone’s work history? Jon gave his own. Where did I say where anyone lives? It was Jon posted my address. Why isn’t Miss Moral Idiocy attacking him for this?
Audrey reminds me of the anti-vivisectionists described by Haldane:
So apt is this as a character study that it predicts the characteristic fantasies:
> Don't dish it out if you can't take it.
Be careful what you say, Audrey Mulertt. Your words may come back to bite you.
What, actually, have I dished out, which comes even near to what’s routinely thrown at me?
> > Says you, projecting wildly again. Tell us what I
> > have to be jealous of in your case, Audrey—or
> > are you wrapping yourself in someone else’s?
> I'M not the one who tries to mock Phd and
> MA. That would be you and the lover.
This from someone who happily defames entire academic disciplines.
Since when did holders of higher degrees become exalted beings who must not be mocked? In this forum?
And I know that you’re pathologically incapable of it, but do try to be honest. You’re talking here about two people only.
> > Personal information to embarrass someone? How so?
> > It wasn’t Jon’s, remember? So he told me. Oops,
> > what have you said? Looks like you’ve just embarrassed someone.
> I have no idea who Jon is you twisted little man.
Then seek professional help.
> Are you short, as in not very tall, because you
> sure act like you have the short man syndrome.
Oh, now there’s a height requirement?
> Nothing you say now will distract from your evil
> intentions, from your abhorrent postings.
Nothing will make you other than a paranoid crackpot with a portmanteau of personality disorders.
> > This is your slimy hypocrisy in a nutshell. You
> > assume that you and your clique have a right to
> > throw abuse at me, with no kind of comeback.
> > Doesn’t work like that.
> How long have you been stalking Creighton? How
> many websites have you followed him to just to
> harass him? How many people have you gone out of
> your way to harass?
> You're a psycho cyber stalker.
So the Internet is his private domain?
How long has Creighton been stalking me? How long have the pair of you?
> > There ahead of you, Audrey. Expect a visit from
> > . . . something.
> You're babbling now, take that pacifier out of
> your mouth if you're trying to talk
Your not getting the allusion doesn’t make you clever, Audrey.