> Jon’s credibility as what? He’s not John
> Snape, remember? Or is he? He’s not exactly
> been clear on this. Posting abuse while
> apparently drunk didn’t help. Jon brought his
> own credibility into question.
You are totally nuts.
Abuse! How many people have you stalked? How many have told you that you are obnoxious?
Now you're going to cry and whine. Frickin crybaby
Where are the letters after your name warty? Here they are..... E.O. as in evil one.
> Just between you and me and the board, Audrey, you are far too stupid to pull
> off this kind of twisting. It was you made qualifications and work history
> an issue, not me. Who do you think you are kidding? Do you think the readers
> are stupid? Sorry, I forgot: of course you do.
There is no way you can distract from, excuse or justify your psychotic stalking.
>> > As they say on the ranch, you're squealing like
> > stuck pig.
> Is this your relevant work history, Audrey?
Working with pigs or ranching? Both put food on your table. If I had worked in either industry the only thing you should be saying is - thank you.
Or don't you know where beef comes from. Maybe you've never stepped foot on a ranch.
You probably consider yourself above those who produce food, that's how nuts you are.
> Do you expect us to believe this, simply because
> you say so? You are not qualified to make this
> You made the claim, you back it up.
Following your philosophy, it is upon the challenger to prove it false, ie Vyse. So you have to prove it false.
This is what you always do when you cannot stand up to the facts presented, you try to snake your way out of it by throwing it on the other person.
You have made discussion impossible. You've lost all respect from those with a sense of decency.