Audrey Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > The usual Mulertt combination of malice and
> > ineptitude.
>
> Yes, that is my name. Does using it empower you in
> some way? Are you going to stalk me now?

Are you going to Google my name, looking for some dirt to throw at me? No, wait, you already did that.

> YOU are the evil one who was psycho enough
> to bring Jon's credibility into question.

Jon’s credibility as what? He’s not John Snape, remember? Or is he? He’s not exactly been clear on this. Posting abuse while apparently drunk didn’t help. Jon brought his own credibility into question.

> Now I demand that you inform us of your education,
> post kindergarten, where and when you got it.
> I demand to know your work history and current
> employment and how it qualifies you as being
> knowledgeable in history in any way.

Just between you and me and the board, Audrey, you are far too stupid to pull off this kind of twisting. It was you made qualifications and work history an issue, not me. Who do you think you are kidding? Do you think the readers are stupid? Sorry, I forgot: of course you do.

> As they say on the ranch, you're squealing like a
> stuck pig.

Is this your relevant work history, Audrey?

> All your squealing won't make the dissention and
> questions go away.
>
> p.s. you are so off the mark with Cullimore. Which
> gives me great joy. I expect you'll spend the next
> day looking for Cullimore-Vyse connection. Ask
> Merrells help, she's better at research

Do you expect us to believe this, simply because you say so? You are not qualified to make this judgement.

You made the claim, you back it up.

M.