loveritas Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Breaking News
>
> The highly popular case of Creighton v Vyse
> resumed today with the Professor and Gilligan
> attempting to discredit the entire body of
> knowledge concerning Egyptian hieroglyphics.
>
> Gilligan, after a rushed trip back to the "Minnow"
> to retrieve his much loved book, "Sailors' Slurs :
> A Nautical Guide to Genteel Gutter Language", was
> hot to trot in assisting the hapless Professor
> onto higher levels of proof of the non existence
> of the much maligned Khufu.
>
> Still not realising that it is totally irrelevant
> whether, or not, the cartouche in Campbell's
> Chamber is a fake, and having their scientific
> basis of negation blown out of the water by the
> correlation of the results of Radio Carbon Dating
> with the OK time line, the pair changed tack and
> decided that if it could be shown that
> hieroglyphics were invalid then they might have
> some chance of salvaging Creighton's reputation,
> and their own.
>
> Unfortunately, neither the Professor, nor
> Gilligan, have the faintest clue about the
> deciphering of hieroglyphics and totally
> embarrassed themselves with their ignorance of the
> basics of this discipline. Geezer, who is the self
> professed only person on the planet to correctly
> decipher the Pyramid Texts was not in attendance,
> leaving the hapless duo to flounder hopelessly,
> much to the amusement of the gallery.
>
> The constant barking of the dog made it difficult
> to hear all of the Professor's inane questions
> regarding the spelling of the word Khufu, but the
> outcome was predictable.
>
> What this bumbling lot fail to understand is that,
> by calling into question the accumulated knowledge
> of the decipherment of hieroglyphics, they are
> undermining Creighton's case. Creighton is relying
> on the exact deciphering of the Khufu cartouche in
> Campbell's Chamber. It is the basis of his latest
> book - the lynchpin of proving a conspiracy and
> revealing the "true history of Ancient Egypt."
>
> The whole cartouche controversy comes down to a
> few small paint marks which Creighton claims prove
> that the cartouche is another pharaoh from an
> earlier era (even though the cartouche was not
> used in an earlier era). Creighton is relying on
> the exactness of hieroglyphic decipherment to
> prove this point. But his legal team are doing
> their best to negate his basic tenet by
> discrediting all interpretations of
> hieroglyphics.
>
> No wonder the members of the jury shake their
> heads and wonder why Creighton employed such a
> bunch of ninnies.
>
> Court is adjourned until tomorrow.
>
> lover

Hi lvr, great post!


Keep up the good work.

Cheers!