Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Ellison Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > What on earth are you talking about .
> > Two different cameras
> > Two different sensors
> > Two different analogue to dig converters.
> > Two different signal to noise processors
> > Two different processors.
> > The noise appears in exactly the same place on
> > both.?????
> >
> > You need to do some homework..
>
> Same image format, same encoding, prone to the
> same kind of artifact: colour bleeding.
>
> Same location, same subject.
>
> Enlarging the images, we see similar colour
> bleeding and similar pinkish streaks.
>
> Your continued diversionary blather suggesting
> that you don’t understand what’s being said.
>
> > No you haven't missed something , Which is
> > actually quite surprising.
> > I doubt that it is necessary to prove through
> > experimentation that a freshly dipped brush is
> > more prone to dripping than an unloaded brush .
> > You see Martin . Most people have this worked
> out
> > before the age of five.
>
> You’ll find, Snape, that being snide while
> failing to understand simple English makes you
> look doubly stupid (no doubt with justice).

OK seeing as were into Harry Potter name calling I'll henceforth refer to you as Hogwart.
>
> Again by way of paraphrase: you’re being
> challenged to do what you say someone else did:
> reproduce what we see in the Chapuis image, a
> cartouche with NO visible paint runs, using
> paint which is nevertheless fluid enough to run
> accidentally.
>
> Contriving paint runs is easy. Any fool can do
> it. I’m sure you can.
>
> Hard part is reproducing what we find empirically:
> a cartouche which is verifiably (going by Chapuis)
> circa 99% free of paint runs.
>
> You say someone else did this? Do it
> yourself—or cop out and be honest about it.
>
> Your troll quotient is rising by the minute.

OK Hogwart.
If you find it necessary to demonstrate to yourself that a freshly loaded paintbrush is more prone to dripping than a not freshly dipped paint brush then feel free to do so.
I'm sure that the vast majority of people have already carried out the experiment at some time in their lives.

I might add that many painted surfaces are relatively 99% free from paint runs but nevertheless often exhibit a troublesome single paint run or two. 1%.. say
Something else most people will have direct experience of.

So there we have it

A number of different photographs from different cameras displaying identical runs.
So therefore cannot be related to any digital compression process.

Freshly dipped paintbrushes are more prone to producing runs than those that are not freshly dipped.

Single or a low percentage paint runs can occur in an otherwise wide expanse of run free painted surfaces.

I think the term "No Brainer" applies to the last two.

Did you get all of that
HogWart..??

Paint runs, Red, Vertical, Painted in situ, Numerous unrelated photographs.

The reed was painted before the loop....



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 21-Jun-16 20:38 by Jon Ellison.