Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
The Runny Red Ochre Cartouche of Khufu in Campbell's Chamber indicates it's painted in Situ.
Excerpt comment by Scott Creighton / The The Great Pyramid Hoax -ATS
The cartouche is there. The end ‘rope’ is there. The snake is there. The quail chics are there. The disc is there. Two dots are there (why these two dots and none of the others remains a mystery). Vyse draws what he believes are all the essential elements of the cartouche—except he entirely MISSES the essential element of the hatched lines. It is one thing making a representative or rough drawing of something—it is an entirely different issue when one misses out a very obvious element of what one is supposed to be copying. And he does it in his private journal not once but TWICE. Now you may be happy to put this down to a simple oversight—I am not and I rather think many others will take my view. If the lines were there why not make a doodle or rough drawing of them? Vyse didn’t because they WEREN’T there. They were only added after Vyse realized (from his visit to the Tomb of the Trades) that the lines were required—and he then had them added. That is what all his deliberations in his private journal of 16th June 1837 were about.
Scott Creighton comment/ Unexplained Mysteries forum /GP Hoax
Do not misunderstand what I am saying here. Walter Allen tells us that his great-grandfather Humphries Brewer who apparently worked with Vyse at Giza in 1837 had a dispute with Raven and Hill—Vyse’s assistants—about painting marks in the pyramids. “Feint marks were repainted, some were new.”
*****************
Now then....if we go back to the near beginning of the Forgery Challenge.
We find Sitchin forward the above quote of Scott's of Humphries Brewer.
The discovery in the detail of the Khufu Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber
[books.simonandschuster.com]
The Runny Red Ochre supports Sitchins information point
It challenges the painted by gangs in the quarry which Egyptology maintains.
Scott's discovery of Vyse drawing his Khufus where he is unsure of final design.
Only to draw the Viper and dots as if it were a real 4th dyn glyph used to spell Khufu in a Cartouche.
Myself....was unaware of the Runny Red Ochre information.
Others reading along may also be unawares.
Guess the Egyptology Peer review certify board will have to revise publish and correct on graffiti being
Applied at the Quarry.
T Bird
Excerpt comment by Scott Creighton / The The Great Pyramid Hoax -ATS
The cartouche is there. The end ‘rope’ is there. The snake is there. The quail chics are there. The disc is there. Two dots are there (why these two dots and none of the others remains a mystery). Vyse draws what he believes are all the essential elements of the cartouche—except he entirely MISSES the essential element of the hatched lines. It is one thing making a representative or rough drawing of something—it is an entirely different issue when one misses out a very obvious element of what one is supposed to be copying. And he does it in his private journal not once but TWICE. Now you may be happy to put this down to a simple oversight—I am not and I rather think many others will take my view. If the lines were there why not make a doodle or rough drawing of them? Vyse didn’t because they WEREN’T there. They were only added after Vyse realized (from his visit to the Tomb of the Trades) that the lines were required—and he then had them added. That is what all his deliberations in his private journal of 16th June 1837 were about.
Scott Creighton comment/ Unexplained Mysteries forum /GP Hoax
Do not misunderstand what I am saying here. Walter Allen tells us that his great-grandfather Humphries Brewer who apparently worked with Vyse at Giza in 1837 had a dispute with Raven and Hill—Vyse’s assistants—about painting marks in the pyramids. “Feint marks were repainted, some were new.”
*****************
Now then....if we go back to the near beginning of the Forgery Challenge.
We find Sitchin forward the above quote of Scott's of Humphries Brewer.
The discovery in the detail of the Khufu Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber
[books.simonandschuster.com]
The Runny Red Ochre supports Sitchins information point
It challenges the painted by gangs in the quarry which Egyptology maintains.
Scott's discovery of Vyse drawing his Khufus where he is unsure of final design.
Only to draw the Viper and dots as if it were a real 4th dyn glyph used to spell Khufu in a Cartouche.
Myself....was unaware of the Runny Red Ochre information.
Others reading along may also be unawares.
Guess the Egyptology Peer review certify board will have to revise publish and correct on graffiti being
Applied at the Quarry.
T Bird
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.