Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
R Avry Wilson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And if I didn't actually "say is in so many
> > words",
then why did you put
> "Egyptologist"
> > in quotes to imply I actually said "no
> > 'Egyptologist' contradicted Reisner" when I
> never
> > said that? Not even once, let alone "post after
> > post".
>
> Dear Philip,
>
> Your ability to follow a conversation and stick to
> a simple, logical flow is so bloody disturbing and
> frustrating that you draw out harsh criticism of
> both your grammatical gymnastics and obtuse
> argumentation with galactic ease. Stop jumping
> around like a small child in your attempts to
> micromanage these tendential tangents. It's no
> wonder Martin doesn't let up on you (nor some
> others) because your stubbornness invites it.
>
> You are so determined not to admit an error you'd
> rather (subliminally?) continue to post pointless
> debate content no matter how absurd it is. You
> most certainly did both say and imply Reisner's
> opinion stood unchallenged for sixty years.
>
> Now SHUT UP. Don't come back with a typical, "Duh,
> where'd I say that?" "Did I say that?" "I did
> not!" feigned, innocent BS.
>
> I don't know what's worse: You're inane responses
> to the charge(s), or the utter
> irrelevancy
of Reisner's opinion being a
> mold to all of Egyptology, or, as we may guess
> blindly, that it somehow has a bearing on the
> 'forgery' question. You're like a lawyer who knows
> his client is 100% guilty, yet digs out fanatical
> twirls of invented 'evidence' to try to get the
> client off because, by law, you must give him/her
> the right of a defense. (I fully expect you to go
> off on a debate over law practices rather than see
> I've given an EXAMPLE.)
>
> (snip diatribe on your tangent Reisner argument)
>
> > It's interesting that you omitted that
> > pesky detail (pg.83 of Lehner '85):
> >
> >
    "the mother image fullfills a distinct
    > > function in the Egyptian belief of a life after
    > > death--- it holds out the promise of
    > immortality"
    > > (Ibid., 174). In effect, the king's rebirth
    > > invokes the image of a return to, and passage
    > > through, the mother.40
>
> First, you have no understanding of the mother
> image, nor what he is actually saying here. This
> would require an understanding of AE symbolism.
> Second, your 'pesky' detail is not 'pesky', nor is
> it contextual to the provenance of Hetepheres. See
> what I mean? You're poking around to elongate your
> impression of Reisner but can't even stay relevant
> to your own irrelevancy.
>
>
> > Regarding your reference to Romer, does he
> > actually deny or even express doubt about
> anything
> > in Reisner's narrative? Does he deny that
> G7000x
> > was her tomb even though the alabaster box was
> > empty? Does he discuss Verner, Aldred, Münch's
> > "funerary deposit" hypothesis, Lehner's '85
> > rebuttal to Reisner, or even cite any of them
> in
> > his bibilography? He doesn't deny Reisner's
> claim
> > of the family tree, and so I doubt he
> acknowledges
> > Lehner's alternate interpretation (and Edwards'
> > acknowledgement) of "Mother" as it applies to
> the
> > afterlife.
>
> Sadly, there gets a point where there's no other
> way to say something: Who *(**%^$%! cares? None of
> this Pied Piper discursion is relevant. The flute
> you employ is satiated with mucous, giving off
> whiffs of air in place of expected clear notes.
> Ffft, fft, goes Philip, trying to blow out another
> chorus. You can check the volume or peer down the
> tube to inspect the problem all you want. No
> amount of self-assessment is going to perform a
> song of logic for us. Alas.
>
> > He called it "ingeneous", not "fanciful" and
> not
> > "speculation". That imbues credibility, not
> doubt.
>
> Trying to redefine what or how a synonym is or how
> its applied is clearly not a tool in your set. And
> who cares about tearing down individual words in
> someone's narrative? This is more failed flute
> ffft, i.e. useless semantics.
>
> And I respond here only because your tactics are
> worthy of fly-swatting. In other words, what you
> think is content added to a debate is
> nothing other than a desire to be combative as
> opposed to conversational. And it is gruesomely
> tiresome, Philip.
>
> Get it: The massive thread on this topic is
> focused on a forgery claim. Put simply, there is
> no forgery. It is a silly, preposterous notion
> being flatulently redistributed by those who
> refuse to see it for what it is ... even in
> opposition to our host, who at first inserted it
> into his early work, but when faced with the
> evidence was unequivocal in his acceptance. You
> and others deny first-hand witness accounts of the
> cartouche ... why? Do you need someone to poke
> your forehead with an index finger?
>
> Anyways.
>
> Play your flute all you want. It is better to just
> ignore your posts until such time as you can own
> up to being honest with us and yourself. Saying
> 'sorry, I got that wrong' or 'I have reflected on
> my previous view and ...' won't make you look bad
> (though you may fear so), it will make you much
> more impressive.
>
> Regards,
> Avry



I'm still waiting to hear how Vyse got into the Boat Pit.

apparently the easiest questions ARE the hardest to answer. Or, is that easiest to ignore?

Warwick

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Creighton Persists Part 2 4181 JonnyMcA 19-May-16 14:30
That chemical analysis . . . 719 Martin Stower 19-May-16 17:30
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 636 Origyptian 19-May-16 20:50
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 613 Jon Ellison 19-May-16 21:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 585 Martin Stower 19-May-16 22:01
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 574 Martin Stower 19-May-16 21:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 551 Origyptian 19-May-16 22:12
The unfounded accusations continue..... 670 DScribr 19-May-16 22:46
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 650 Martin Stower 20-May-16 00:14
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 573 Thanos5150 20-May-16 00:35
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 461 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 01:57
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 578 Origyptian 20-May-16 02:47
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 463 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 03:20
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 544 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:10
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 572 DScribr 20-May-16 23:23
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 560 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 23:35
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 544 DScribr 20-May-16 23:40
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 519 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:07
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 419 DScribr 20-May-16 02:58
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 568 Martin Stower 19-May-16 22:55
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 575 DScribr 19-May-16 22:43
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 557 Martin Stower 19-May-16 23:30
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 619 Origyptian 20-May-16 02:48
The lack of analysis . . . 673 DScribr 20-May-16 03:05
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 609 Audrey 20-May-16 04:13
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 531 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 06:58
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 561 DScribr 20-May-16 23:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 692 Origyptian 20-May-16 15:46
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 521 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 516 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 564 Martin Stower 21-May-16 02:07
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 546 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 06:43
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 559 Origyptian 21-May-16 14:58
So much for chemical analysis . . . 548 DScribr 21-May-16 19:54
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 548 Martin Stower 21-May-16 22:49
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 543 Martin Stower 21-May-16 23:00
Re: What's the end game with this? 644 Thunderbird 20-May-16 17:20
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 542 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 529 Audrey 20-May-16 22:43
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 484 Martin Stower 20-May-16 22:54
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 522 Audrey 20-May-16 23:12
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 462 Martin Stower 20-May-16 23:52
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 543 Audrey 21-May-16 00:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 615 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:45
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 457 DScribr 21-May-16 01:35
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 405 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:06
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 489 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 563 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:36
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 743 Martin Stower 21-May-16 02:49
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 603 Martin Stower 20-May-16 18:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 612 Origyptian 20-May-16 20:00
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 520 Thanos5150 20-May-16 20:13
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 553 Origyptian 20-May-16 21:03
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 550 Martin Stower 20-May-16 23:44
Höfer and Görlitz meet Stein 486 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:36
Re: Höfer and Görlitz meet Stein 463 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:23
Re: Höfer and Görlitz meet Stein 680 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:55
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 532 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:34
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 553 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:15
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 483 Origyptian 21-May-16 04:08
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 548 Martin Stower 21-May-16 23:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 642 Origyptian 22-May-16 00:09
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 500 Martin Stower 22-May-16 00:49
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 589 Origyptian 22-May-16 00:57
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 565 Origyptian 22-May-16 01:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 549 Jon Ellison 22-May-16 01:14
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 580 Martin Stower 22-May-16 01:51
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 534 Origyptian 22-May-16 04:21
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 581 Martin Stower 22-May-16 14:20
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 538 Origyptian 22-May-16 17:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 588 Martin Stower 22-May-16 18:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 548 Origyptian 22-May-16 20:34
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 472 Martin Stower 22-May-16 21:30
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 572 Origyptian 22-May-16 23:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 589 Martin Stower 23-May-16 00:03
Re: That chemical analysis is all but forgotten...... 536 DScribr 23-May-16 03:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 571 Richard Fusniak 21-May-16 08:47
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 541 Origyptian 21-May-16 13:26
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 503 Martin Stower 22-May-16 00:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 534 Origyptian 22-May-16 00:50
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 567 Martin Stower 22-May-16 01:39
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 461 Origyptian 22-May-16 04:45
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 477 Martin Stower 22-May-16 16:13
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 464 Martin Stower 21-May-16 22:44
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 669 Origyptian 21-May-16 23:58
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 508 Martin Stower 22-May-16 01:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 755 Martin Stower 20-May-16 22:44
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 517 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:41
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 591 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 596 Origyptian 21-May-16 04:14
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 437 Martin Stower 21-May-16 23:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 577 Thanos5150 19-May-16 22:50
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 557 Martin Stower 19-May-16 23:18
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 464 DScribr 20-May-16 03:07
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 561 Origyptian 20-May-16 02:52
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 503 DScribr 20-May-16 03:12
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 575 Thanos5150 20-May-16 05:20
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 465 Origyptian 20-May-16 13:36
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 582 Thanos5150 20-May-16 17:57
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 578 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 18:56
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 565 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:23
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 636 Thanos5150 20-May-16 19:27
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 496 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 19:29
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 528 Audrey 20-May-16 21:02
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 551 Origyptian 20-May-16 21:12
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 528 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 21:26
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 594 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:08
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 581 Audrey 20-May-16 22:34
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 481 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:36
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 567 Audrey 20-May-16 22:47
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 474 Thanos5150 20-May-16 23:00
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 495 Audrey 20-May-16 23:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 480 Thanos5150 21-May-16 00:01
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 491 Audrey 21-May-16 00:23
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 539 Thanos5150 21-May-16 03:14
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 533 Audrey 21-May-16 05:02
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 469 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 09:10
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 599 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 09:28
The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 615 DScribr 21-May-16 13:37
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 482 Origyptian 21-May-16 13:56
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 526 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 17:48
Willful ignorance continues....... 561 DScribr 21-May-16 19:49
Re: Willful ignorance continues....... 578 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 21:28
Re: Stealing IS a crime! Willful ignorance continues....... 478 DScribr 22-May-16 00:39
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 573 Richard Fusniak 21-May-16 18:17
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 455 DScribr 21-May-16 19:57
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 584 Richard Fusniak 21-May-16 20:24
Stealing IS A Crime!!! 565 DScribr 22-May-16 00:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 557 Origyptian 21-May-16 15:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 476 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 17:53
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 534 Origyptian 21-May-16 21:39
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 534 Jon Ellison 22-May-16 00:46
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 484 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:09
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 566 Audrey 21-May-16 00:26
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 567 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 524 Audrey 21-May-16 01:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 599 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:41
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 553 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 11:00
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 517 DScribr 21-May-16 01:44
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 518 Origyptian 20-May-16 19:25
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 531 Thanos5150 20-May-16 19:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 482 Origyptian 20-May-16 20:35
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 560 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:03
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 479 Origyptian 20-May-16 22:38
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 563 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:52
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 497 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 567 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:05
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 494 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:27
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 518 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 499 Audrey 21-May-16 01:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 596 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:34
Pending statement from Dr. Gorlitz 825 Richard Fusniak 20-May-16 12:04
Re: Pending statement from Dr. Gorlitz 588 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:25
Martin Persists 633 drrayeye 23-May-16 01:30
Re: Martin Persists 611 Martin Stower 23-May-16 12:01
Re: Martin Persists 472 R Avry Wilson 24-May-16 19:58
Mainstream Persists 565 DScribr 25-May-16 00:56
Re: Martin Persists 691 Merrell 28-May-16 09:00
Re: Martin Persists 524 Martin Stower 28-May-16 11:11
as long as we are counting 621 Warwick 25-May-16 16:42
Re: as long as we are counting 580 DScribr 26-May-16 01:53
Re: as long as we are counting 618 cladking 26-May-16 16:57
Re: as long as we are counting 540 Martin Stower 26-May-16 17:31
Re: as long as we are counting 546 Origyptian 26-May-16 17:40
Re: as long as we are counting 465 cladking 27-May-16 00:21
Re: as long as we are counting 554 Warwick 27-May-16 01:27
Re: as long as we are counting 369 Origyptian 27-May-16 02:53
And work hard at obfuscation. 442 DScribr 27-May-16 00:57
Re: And work hard at obfuscation. 506 cladking 27-May-16 02:55
Re: as long as we are counting 477 Warwick 27-May-16 01:29
Re: as long as we are counting 576 cladking 27-May-16 02:59
Re: as long as we are counting 557 Warwick 27-May-16 03:35
Re: as long as we are counting 535 Audrey 27-May-16 04:32
Re: as long as we are counting 490 Warwick 27-May-16 05:34
Re: as long as we are counting 590 cladking 27-May-16 13:35
Re: as long as we are counting 548 Warwick 27-May-16 14:56
The original page on Indiegogo etc. 636 Martin Stower 25-May-16 22:10
Another performance . . . 520 Martin Stower 26-May-16 13:47
Re: Another performance . . . 475 Warwick 26-May-16 13:57
Re: Another performance . . . 415 Origyptian 26-May-16 14:53
Re: Another performance . . . 516 Martin Stower 26-May-16 16:09
Re: Another performance . . . 521 cladking 26-May-16 16:18
Re: Another performance . . . 427 Martin Stower 26-May-16 16:31
Re: Another performance . . . 741 cladking 26-May-16 17:54
Re: Another performance . . . 580 Martin Stower 26-May-16 18:29
Re: Another performance . . . 406 cladking 26-May-16 23:52
Re: Another performance . . . 562 eyeofhorus33 26-May-16 19:00
Re: Another performance . . . 449 cladking 27-May-16 00:05
Re: Another performance . . . 482 Audrey 27-May-16 00:23
Re: Another performance . . . 468 Warwick 27-May-16 01:42
Re: Another performance . . . 553 cladking 27-May-16 02:07
Re: Another performance . . . 498 Warwick 27-May-16 02:15
Re: Another performance . . . 531 cladking 27-May-16 02:48
Re: Another performance . . . 507 Warwick 27-May-16 03:48
Re: Another performance . . . 567 cladking 27-May-16 03:53
Re: Another performance . . . 593 Warwick 27-May-16 05:41
Re: Another performance . . . 495 Audrey 27-May-16 04:51
Re: Another performance . . . 528 Warwick 27-May-16 05:18
NOT Primitive, Low-Tech 484 DScribr 28-May-16 14:09
Re: NOT Primitive, Low-Tech 532 cladking 28-May-16 14:31
Re: Another performance . . . 567 Thanos5150 26-May-16 16:38
Re: Another performance . . . 458 cladking 26-May-16 16:44
Re: Another performance . . . 545 Origyptian 26-May-16 17:33
Re: Another performance . . . 577 cladking 26-May-16 17:40
Re: Another performance . . . 552 Martin Stower 26-May-16 17:49
Re: Another performance . . . 576 cladking 27-May-16 00:15
Re: Another performance . . . 557 Martin Stower 27-May-16 19:17
Re: Another performance . . . 575 Warwick 27-May-16 20:00
Re: Another performance . . . 500 cladking 27-May-16 20:21
Re: Another performance . . . 609 Martin Stower 27-May-16 23:06
Re: Oops....we missed the Basalt flooring and machine disc cuts 412 Thunderbird 27-May-16 23:28
Re: Oops....we missed the Basalt flooring and machine disc cuts 544 Martin Stower 27-May-16 23:41
Re: Another performance . . . 553 cladking 28-May-16 00:33
Re: Another performance . . . 537 Martin Stower 28-May-16 00:59
Re: Another performance . . . 532 cladking 28-May-16 02:36
Re: Another performance . . . 519 Martin Stower 28-May-16 23:55
Re: Another performance . . . 440 cladking 29-May-16 01:23
Re: Another performance . . . 490 Martin Stower 29-May-16 19:35
Re: Another performance . . . 657 cladking 29-May-16 20:43
Re: Another performance . . . 546 R Avry Wilson 28-May-16 02:39
Re: Another performance . . . 573 cladking 28-May-16 03:41
Re: Another performance . . . 516 Thanos5150 28-May-16 06:20
Re: Another performance . . . 581 cladking 28-May-16 13:40
Re: Another performance . . . 555 Origyptian 28-May-16 15:04
Re: Another performance . . . 535 Jon Ellison 28-May-16 16:38
Re: Another performance . . . 406 cladking 28-May-16 17:52
Re: Another performance . . . 498 Jon Ellison 28-May-16 17:58
Re: Another performance . . . 430 Origyptian 29-May-16 02:51
Re: Another performance . . . 449 cladking 29-May-16 03:08
Re: Another performance . . . 511 Origyptian 29-May-16 04:03
Re: Another performance . . . 528 Thanos5150 29-May-16 05:03
Re: Another performance . . . 555 Origyptian 29-May-16 13:18
Re: Another performance . . . 575 Thanos5150 29-May-16 15:03
Focus on the axiom 513 Origyptian 29-May-16 15:27
Re: Focus on everything BUT the facts 596 DScribr 29-May-16 15:41
Re: Focus on everything BUT the facts 475 cladking 29-May-16 17:29
Re: Focus on the axiom 453 Thanos5150 30-May-16 01:49
Re: Focus on the axiom 524 Origyptian 30-May-16 05:32
Re: Focus on the axiom 511 Thanos5150 31-May-16 02:35
Re: Focus on the axiom 539 Origyptian 31-May-16 06:41
Re: Focus on the axiom 544 Thanos5150 01-Jun-16 00:28
Re: Focus on reality. 501 DScribr 01-Jun-16 00:51
Re: Focus on the axiom 486 Origyptian 01-Jun-16 06:20
Re: Focus on the axiom 532 Thanos5150 02-Jun-16 03:08
Re: Focus on the axiom 509 cladking 02-Jun-16 04:00
Re: Focus on the axiom 453 Origyptian 02-Jun-16 04:25
Re: Focus on the axiom 462 Thanos5150 02-Jun-16 16:34
Re: Focus on the axiom 475 cladking 02-Jun-16 18:20
Re: Focus on the axiom 528 Origyptian 03-Jun-16 18:04
Re: Focus on the axiom 524 R Avry Wilson 03-Jun-16 18:43
Re: Focus on the axiom 508 Origyptian 03-Jun-16 21:24
Re: Focus on the axiom 506 Corpuscles 03-Jun-16 23:59
Re: Focus on the axiom 354 Origyptian 04-Jun-16 06:29
Re: Focus on the axiom 432 R Avry Wilson 04-Jun-16 00:12
Re: Focus on the axiom 422 Origyptian 04-Jun-16 07:02
Re: Focus on the axiom 545 Jon Ellison 04-Jun-16 10:18
Re: Focus on the axiom 487 R Avry Wilson 05-Jun-16 04:15
Re: Focus on the axiom 494 Martin Stower 03-Jun-16 22:28
Re: Focus on the axiom 492 cladking 03-Jun-16 22:51
Re: Focus on the axiom 618 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 01:08
Re: Focus on the axiom 505 Origyptian 05-Jun-16 01:25
Re: Focus on the axiom 545 Thanos5150 05-Jun-16 04:15
Re: Focus on the axiom 507 Origyptian 05-Jun-16 17:29
Re: Focus on the axiom 539 Martin Stower 05-Jun-16 19:35
Re: Focus on the axiom 554 Origyptian 05-Jun-16 22:48
Re: Focus on the axiom 467 Martin Stower 05-Jun-16 23:47
Re: Focus on the axiom 514 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 00:54
Re: Focus on the axiom 479 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 01:01
Re: Focus on the axiom 518 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 01:05
Re: Focus on the axiom 503 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 02:40
Re: Focus on the axiom 521 R Avry Wilson 06-Jun-16 03:39
Re: Focus on the axiom 443 Audrey 06-Jun-16 04:59
Re: Focus on the axiom 431 Jon Ellison 06-Jun-16 07:59
Re: Focus on the axiom 455 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 14:00
Re: Focus on the axiom 502 cladking 06-Jun-16 16:13
Re: Focus on the axiom 461 Corpuscles 07-Jun-16 00:20
Re: Focus on the axiom 506 Origyptian 07-Jun-16 02:55
Re: Focus on the axiom 448 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 15:33
Re: Focus on the axiom 396 Warwick 06-Jun-16 16:17
Re: Focus on the axiom 528 Audrey 06-Jun-16 16:39
Re: Focus on the axiom 521 Warwick 06-Jun-16 16:58
Re: Focus on the axiom 421 Audrey 06-Jun-16 17:46
Re: Focus on the axiom 463 Warwick 06-Jun-16 18:13
Re: Focus on the axiom 400 Audrey 06-Jun-16 23:44
Read what I wrote 419 Warwick 07-Jun-16 17:15
Re: Read what I wrote 445 Audrey 08-Jun-16 00:22
Re: Read what I wrote 436 Martin Stower 08-Jun-16 01:40
Re: Read what I wrote 602 Audrey 08-Jun-16 01:52
Re: Read what I wrote 466 Martin Stower 08-Jun-16 13:47
Vyse's veracity.... 458 Warwick 09-Jun-16 16:29
Re: Vyse's veracity.... 379 Audrey 09-Jun-16 16:51
Re: Vyse's veracity.... 489 Warwick 09-Jun-16 17:19
Re: Vyse's veracity.... 518 Audrey 09-Jun-16 17:45
Wilkinson's opinions 444 Warwick 09-Jun-16 18:47
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 460 Origyptian 09-Jun-16 20:57
Ori's opinions 607 DScribr 10-Jun-16 01:45
Re: The incredible Teflon Red Ochre 433 Thunderbird 10-Jun-16 04:07
Re: The incredible Teflon Red Ochre 558 Martin Stower 10-Jun-16 14:49
Re: The incredible Red Ochre lasted 4500 yrs. 478 DScribr 11-Jun-16 00:40
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 405 Martin Stower 10-Jun-16 02:28
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 396 Audrey 10-Jun-16 03:05
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 531 Martin Stower 10-Jun-16 14:09
Bibliography 471 Warwick 10-Jun-16 18:07
Re: Bibliography 485 Origyptian 10-Jun-16 18:35
Re: Bibliography 462 Warwick 10-Jun-16 20:01
Re: Bibliography 514 Origyptian 10-Jun-16 21:54
Re: Bibliography 535 Corpuscles 10-Jun-16 23:45
Re: Bibliography 349 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 17:01
Re: Bibliography 484 Corpuscles 11-Jun-16 22:36
Re: Bibliography 440 Audrey 11-Jun-16 23:08
Re: Bibliography 466 Corpuscles 11-Jun-16 23:26
Re: Bibliography 376 Audrey 12-Jun-16 02:30
Re: Bibliography 420 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 03:19
Re: Bibliography 368 Audrey 12-Jun-16 03:32
Re: Bibliography 407 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 03:40
Re: Bibliography 418 Audrey 12-Jun-16 03:50
Re: Bibliography 373 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 04:30
Re: Bibliography 369 Audrey 12-Jun-16 04:47
Re: Bibliography 349 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 05:02
Re: Bibliography 490 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 10:49
Re: Bibliography 446 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 15:56
Re: Bibliography 371 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 17:41
But Avry.. 419 Warwick 12-Jun-16 17:58
Re: But Avry.. 499 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 18:14
Re: But Avry.. 483 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:37
Re: But Avry.. 464 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 20:15
Re: But Avry.. 469 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:44
Re: But Avry.. 439 Warwick 12-Jun-16 18:59
Re: But Avry.. 418 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 20:11
This whole discussion is a boondoggle 496 DScribr 13-Jun-16 01:04
Re: This whole discussion is a boondoggle 478 Warwick 13-Jun-16 16:24
Re: Bibliography 345 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 10:28
Re: Bibliography 440 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 23:35
Re: Bibliography 466 Corpuscles 11-Jun-16 23:58
Re: Bibliography 439 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 00:48
Re: Bibliography 477 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 01:13
Re: Bibliography 507 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 01:33
Re: Bibliography 526 Martin Stower 11-Jun-16 02:05
Re: Bibliography 495 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 18:09
Re: Bibliography 485 Martin Stower 11-Jun-16 19:22
Re: Bibliography 423 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 19:56
Re: Bibliography 351 Martin Stower 11-Jun-16 20:47
Re: Bibliography 477 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:03
Re: Bibliography 462 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 00:22
Re: Bibliography 357 Audrey 12-Jun-16 01:58
Re: Bibliography 496 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 02:24
Re: Bibliography 410 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 12:23
Re: Bibliography 437 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 14:50
Re: Bibliography 450 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 16:46
Re: Bibliography 368 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:10
Re: Bibliography 463 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:18
Re: Bibliography 455 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 00:35
Re: Bibliography 516 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:39
Re: Bibliography 412 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 01:23
Re: Bibliography 412 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 02:18
Re: Bibliography 360 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 13:55
Re: Bibliography 433 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 15:45
Re: Bibliography 463 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 17:32
Re: Bibliography 410 Warwick 12-Jun-16 17:41
Re: Bibliography 457 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 18:08
Re: Bibliography 450 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:48
Re: Bibliography 450 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:35
Re: Bibliography 398 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 19:09
Gonna ignore the noise and try again 446 Warwick 12-Jun-16 19:53
Re: Gonna ignore the noise and try again 459 Thunderbird 12-Jun-16 20:18
Re: Gonna ignore the noise and try again 419 Audrey 12-Jun-16 21:04