Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And if I didn't actually "say is in so many
> words",
then why did you put "Egyptologist"
> in quotes to imply I actually said "no
> 'Egyptologist' contradicted Reisner" when I never
> said that? Not even once, let alone "post after
> post".

Dear Philip,

Your ability to follow a conversation and stick to a simple, logical flow is so bloody disturbing and frustrating that you draw out harsh criticism of both your grammatical gymnastics and obtuse argumentation with galactic ease. Stop jumping around like a small child in your attempts to micromanage these tendential tangents. It's no wonder Martin doesn't let up on you (nor some others) because your stubbornness invites it.

You are so determined not to admit an error you'd rather (subliminally?) continue to post pointless debate content no matter how absurd it is. You most certainly did both say and imply Reisner's opinion stood unchallenged for sixty years.

Now SHUT UP. Don't come back with a typical, "Duh, where'd I say that?" "Did I say that?" "I did not!" feigned, innocent BS.

I don't know what's worse: You're inane responses to the charge(s), or the utter irrelevancy of Reisner's opinion being a mold to all of Egyptology, or, as we may guess blindly, that it somehow has a bearing on the 'forgery' question. You're like a lawyer who knows his client is 100% guilty, yet digs out fanatical twirls of invented 'evidence' to try to get the client off because, by law, you must give him/her the right of a defense. (I fully expect you to go off on a debate over law practices rather than see I've given an EXAMPLE.)

(snip diatribe on your tangent Reisner argument)

> It's interesting that you omitted that
> pesky detail (pg.83 of Lehner '85):
>
>
    "the mother image fullfills a distinct
    > function in the Egyptian belief of a life after
    > death--- it holds out the promise of immortality"
    > (Ibid., 174). In effect, the king's rebirth
    > invokes the image of a return to, and passage
    > through, the mother.40

First, you have no understanding of the mother image, nor what he is actually saying here. This would require an understanding of AE symbolism. Second, your 'pesky' detail is not 'pesky', nor is it contextual to the provenance of Hetepheres. See what I mean? You're poking around to elongate your impression of Reisner but can't even stay relevant to your own irrelevancy.


> Regarding your reference to Romer, does he
> actually deny or even express doubt about anything
> in Reisner's narrative? Does he deny that G7000x
> was her tomb even though the alabaster box was
> empty? Does he discuss Verner, Aldred, Münch's
> "funerary deposit" hypothesis, Lehner's '85
> rebuttal to Reisner, or even cite any of them in
> his bibilography? He doesn't deny Reisner's claim
> of the family tree, and so I doubt he acknowledges
> Lehner's alternate interpretation (and Edwards'
> acknowledgement) of "Mother" as it applies to the
> afterlife.

Sadly, there gets a point where there's no other way to say something: Who *(**%^$%! cares? None of this Pied Piper discursion is relevant. The flute you employ is satiated with mucous, giving off whiffs of air in place of expected clear notes. Ffft, fft, goes Philip, trying to blow out another chorus. You can check the volume or peer down the tube to inspect the problem all you want. No amount of self-assessment is going to perform a song of logic for us. Alas.

> He called it "ingeneous", not "fanciful" and not
> "speculation". That imbues credibility, not doubt.

Trying to redefine what or how a synonym is or how its applied is clearly not a tool in your set. And who cares about tearing down individual words in someone's narrative? This is more failed flute ffft, i.e. useless semantics.

And I respond here only because your tactics are worthy of fly-swatting. In other words, what you think is content added to a debate is nothing other than a desire to be combative as opposed to conversational. And it is gruesomely tiresome, Philip.

Get it: The massive thread on this topic is focused on a forgery claim. Put simply, there is no forgery. It is a silly, preposterous notion being flatulently redistributed by those who refuse to see it for what it is ... even in opposition to our host, who at first inserted it into his early work, but when faced with the evidence was unequivocal in his acceptance. You and others deny first-hand witness accounts of the cartouche ... why? Do you need someone to poke your forehead with an index finger?

Anyways.

Play your flute all you want. It is better to just ignore your posts until such time as you can own up to being honest with us and yourself. Saying 'sorry, I got that wrong' or 'I have reflected on my previous view and ...' won't make you look bad (though you may fear so), it will make you much more impressive.

Regards,
Avry

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Creighton Persists Part 2 4227 JonnyMcA 19-May-16 14:30
That chemical analysis . . . 739 Martin Stower 19-May-16 17:30
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 660 Origyptian 19-May-16 20:50
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 638 Jon Ellison 19-May-16 21:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 610 Martin Stower 19-May-16 22:01
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 599 Martin Stower 19-May-16 21:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 574 Origyptian 19-May-16 22:12
The unfounded accusations continue..... 694 DScribr 19-May-16 22:46
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 678 Martin Stower 20-May-16 00:14
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 596 Thanos5150 20-May-16 00:35
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 498 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 01:57
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 602 Origyptian 20-May-16 02:47
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 487 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 03:20
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 570 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:10
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 602 DScribr 20-May-16 23:23
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 586 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 23:35
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 568 DScribr 20-May-16 23:40
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 540 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:07
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 446 DScribr 20-May-16 02:58
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 593 Martin Stower 19-May-16 22:55
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 598 DScribr 19-May-16 22:43
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 597 Martin Stower 19-May-16 23:30
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 638 Origyptian 20-May-16 02:48
The lack of analysis . . . 699 DScribr 20-May-16 03:05
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 632 Audrey 20-May-16 04:13
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 562 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 06:58
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 590 DScribr 20-May-16 23:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 719 Origyptian 20-May-16 15:46
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 544 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 547 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 586 Martin Stower 21-May-16 02:07
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 570 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 06:43
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 586 Origyptian 21-May-16 14:58
So much for chemical analysis . . . 572 DScribr 21-May-16 19:54
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 573 Martin Stower 21-May-16 22:49
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 564 Martin Stower 21-May-16 23:00
Re: What's the end game with this? 670 Thunderbird 20-May-16 17:20
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 566 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 553 Audrey 20-May-16 22:43
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 507 Martin Stower 20-May-16 22:54
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 547 Audrey 20-May-16 23:12
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 488 Martin Stower 20-May-16 23:52
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 567 Audrey 21-May-16 00:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 638 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:45
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 484 DScribr 21-May-16 01:35
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 430 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:06
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 514 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 585 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:36
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 779 Martin Stower 21-May-16 02:49
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 630 Martin Stower 20-May-16 18:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 636 Origyptian 20-May-16 20:00
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 545 Thanos5150 20-May-16 20:13
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 577 Origyptian 20-May-16 21:03
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 572 Martin Stower 20-May-16 23:44
Höfer and Görlitz meet Stein 514 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:36
Re: Höfer and Görlitz meet Stein 488 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:23
Re: Höfer and Görlitz meet Stein 703 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:55
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 558 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:34
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 578 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:15
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 502 Origyptian 21-May-16 04:08
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 570 Martin Stower 21-May-16 23:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 671 Origyptian 22-May-16 00:09
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 523 Martin Stower 22-May-16 00:49
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 615 Origyptian 22-May-16 00:57
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 588 Origyptian 22-May-16 01:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 573 Jon Ellison 22-May-16 01:14
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 604 Martin Stower 22-May-16 01:51
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 556 Origyptian 22-May-16 04:21
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 606 Martin Stower 22-May-16 14:20
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 561 Origyptian 22-May-16 17:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 616 Martin Stower 22-May-16 18:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 571 Origyptian 22-May-16 20:34
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 497 Martin Stower 22-May-16 21:30
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 596 Origyptian 22-May-16 23:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 616 Martin Stower 23-May-16 00:03
Re: That chemical analysis is all but forgotten...... 553 DScribr 23-May-16 03:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 593 Richard Fusniak 21-May-16 08:47
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 566 Origyptian 21-May-16 13:26
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 534 Martin Stower 22-May-16 00:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 560 Origyptian 22-May-16 00:50
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 589 Martin Stower 22-May-16 01:39
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 486 Origyptian 22-May-16 04:45
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 498 Martin Stower 22-May-16 16:13
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 493 Martin Stower 21-May-16 22:44
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 699 Origyptian 21-May-16 23:58
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 545 Martin Stower 22-May-16 01:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 781 Martin Stower 20-May-16 22:44
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 543 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:41
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 616 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 616 Origyptian 21-May-16 04:14
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 458 Martin Stower 21-May-16 23:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 605 Thanos5150 19-May-16 22:50
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 582 Martin Stower 19-May-16 23:18
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 488 DScribr 20-May-16 03:07
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 586 Origyptian 20-May-16 02:52
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 527 DScribr 20-May-16 03:12
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 597 Thanos5150 20-May-16 05:20
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 494 Origyptian 20-May-16 13:36
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 610 Thanos5150 20-May-16 17:57
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 601 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 18:56
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 587 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:23
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 658 Thanos5150 20-May-16 19:27
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 522 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 19:29
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 555 Audrey 20-May-16 21:02
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 573 Origyptian 20-May-16 21:12
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 549 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 21:26
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 619 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:08
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 620 Audrey 20-May-16 22:34
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 506 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:36
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 607 Audrey 20-May-16 22:47
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 499 Thanos5150 20-May-16 23:00
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 518 Audrey 20-May-16 23:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 497 Thanos5150 21-May-16 00:01
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 514 Audrey 21-May-16 00:23
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 564 Thanos5150 21-May-16 03:14
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 554 Audrey 21-May-16 05:02
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 498 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 09:10
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 622 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 09:28
The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 682 DScribr 21-May-16 13:37
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 504 Origyptian 21-May-16 13:56
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 548 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 17:48
Willful ignorance continues....... 587 DScribr 21-May-16 19:49
Re: Willful ignorance continues....... 608 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 21:28
Re: Stealing IS a crime! Willful ignorance continues....... 502 DScribr 22-May-16 00:39
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 601 Richard Fusniak 21-May-16 18:17
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 477 DScribr 21-May-16 19:57
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 605 Richard Fusniak 21-May-16 20:24
Stealing IS A Crime!!! 586 DScribr 22-May-16 00:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 580 Origyptian 21-May-16 15:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 498 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 17:53
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 557 Origyptian 21-May-16 21:39
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 559 Jon Ellison 22-May-16 00:46
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 509 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:09
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 593 Audrey 21-May-16 00:26
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 590 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 556 Audrey 21-May-16 01:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 629 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:41
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 577 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 11:00
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 545 DScribr 21-May-16 01:44
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 542 Origyptian 20-May-16 19:25
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 556 Thanos5150 20-May-16 19:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 506 Origyptian 20-May-16 20:35
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 584 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:03
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 506 Origyptian 20-May-16 22:38
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 584 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:52
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 522 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 594 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:05
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 519 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:27
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 539 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 525 Audrey 21-May-16 01:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 645 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:34
Pending statement from Dr. Gorlitz 871 Richard Fusniak 20-May-16 12:04
Re: Pending statement from Dr. Gorlitz 616 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:25
Martin Persists 656 drrayeye 23-May-16 01:30
Re: Martin Persists 634 Martin Stower 23-May-16 12:01
Re: Martin Persists 494 R Avry Wilson 24-May-16 19:58
Mainstream Persists 646 DScribr 25-May-16 00:56
Re: Martin Persists 715 Merrell 28-May-16 09:00
Re: Martin Persists 546 Martin Stower 28-May-16 11:11
as long as we are counting 645 Warwick 25-May-16 16:42
Re: as long as we are counting 605 DScribr 26-May-16 01:53
Re: as long as we are counting 643 cladking 26-May-16 16:57
Re: as long as we are counting 567 Martin Stower 26-May-16 17:31
Re: as long as we are counting 572 Origyptian 26-May-16 17:40
Re: as long as we are counting 510 cladking 27-May-16 00:21
Re: as long as we are counting 582 Warwick 27-May-16 01:27
Re: as long as we are counting 395 Origyptian 27-May-16 02:53
And work hard at obfuscation. 466 DScribr 27-May-16 00:57
Re: And work hard at obfuscation. 528 cladking 27-May-16 02:55
Re: as long as we are counting 506 Warwick 27-May-16 01:29
Re: as long as we are counting 600 cladking 27-May-16 02:59
Re: as long as we are counting 580 Warwick 27-May-16 03:35
Re: as long as we are counting 557 Audrey 27-May-16 04:32
Re: as long as we are counting 545 Warwick 27-May-16 05:34
Re: as long as we are counting 613 cladking 27-May-16 13:35
Re: as long as we are counting 569 Warwick 27-May-16 14:56
The original page on Indiegogo etc. 655 Martin Stower 25-May-16 22:10
Another performance . . . 553 Martin Stower 26-May-16 13:47
Re: Another performance . . . 498 Warwick 26-May-16 13:57
Re: Another performance . . . 440 Origyptian 26-May-16 14:53
Re: Another performance . . . 540 Martin Stower 26-May-16 16:09
Re: Another performance . . . 543 cladking 26-May-16 16:18
Re: Another performance . . . 454 Martin Stower 26-May-16 16:31
Re: Another performance . . . 813 cladking 26-May-16 17:54
Re: Another performance . . . 609 Martin Stower 26-May-16 18:29
Re: Another performance . . . 431 cladking 26-May-16 23:52
Re: Another performance . . . 618 eyeofhorus33 26-May-16 19:00
Re: Another performance . . . 468 cladking 27-May-16 00:05
Re: Another performance . . . 510 Audrey 27-May-16 00:23
Re: Another performance . . . 493 Warwick 27-May-16 01:42
Re: Another performance . . . 579 cladking 27-May-16 02:07
Re: Another performance . . . 520 Warwick 27-May-16 02:15
Re: Another performance . . . 555 cladking 27-May-16 02:48
Re: Another performance . . . 530 Warwick 27-May-16 03:48
Re: Another performance . . . 591 cladking 27-May-16 03:53
Re: Another performance . . . 615 Warwick 27-May-16 05:41
Re: Another performance . . . 521 Audrey 27-May-16 04:51
Re: Another performance . . . 571 Warwick 27-May-16 05:18
NOT Primitive, Low-Tech 508 DScribr 28-May-16 14:09
Re: NOT Primitive, Low-Tech 558 cladking 28-May-16 14:31
Re: Another performance . . . 591 Thanos5150 26-May-16 16:38
Re: Another performance . . . 484 cladking 26-May-16 16:44
Re: Another performance . . . 571 Origyptian 26-May-16 17:33
Re: Another performance . . . 601 cladking 26-May-16 17:40
Re: Another performance . . . 576 Martin Stower 26-May-16 17:49
Re: Another performance . . . 599 cladking 27-May-16 00:15
Re: Another performance . . . 582 Martin Stower 27-May-16 19:17
Re: Another performance . . . 600 Warwick 27-May-16 20:00
Re: Another performance . . . 521 cladking 27-May-16 20:21
Re: Another performance . . . 634 Martin Stower 27-May-16 23:06
Re: Oops....we missed the Basalt flooring and machine disc cuts 438 Thunderbird 27-May-16 23:28
Re: Oops....we missed the Basalt flooring and machine disc cuts 627 Martin Stower 27-May-16 23:41
Re: Another performance . . . 579 cladking 28-May-16 00:33
Re: Another performance . . . 588 Martin Stower 28-May-16 00:59
Re: Another performance . . . 558 cladking 28-May-16 02:36
Re: Another performance . . . 547 Martin Stower 28-May-16 23:55
Re: Another performance . . . 466 cladking 29-May-16 01:23
Re: Another performance . . . 514 Martin Stower 29-May-16 19:35
Re: Another performance . . . 681 cladking 29-May-16 20:43
Re: Another performance . . . 573 R Avry Wilson 28-May-16 02:39
Re: Another performance . . . 597 cladking 28-May-16 03:41
Re: Another performance . . . 540 Thanos5150 28-May-16 06:20
Re: Another performance . . . 604 cladking 28-May-16 13:40
Re: Another performance . . . 577 Origyptian 28-May-16 15:04
Re: Another performance . . . 559 Jon Ellison 28-May-16 16:38
Re: Another performance . . . 427 cladking 28-May-16 17:52
Re: Another performance . . . 528 Jon Ellison 28-May-16 17:58
Re: Another performance . . . 455 Origyptian 29-May-16 02:51
Re: Another performance . . . 473 cladking 29-May-16 03:08
Re: Another performance . . . 539 Origyptian 29-May-16 04:03
Re: Another performance . . . 551 Thanos5150 29-May-16 05:03
Re: Another performance . . . 577 Origyptian 29-May-16 13:18
Re: Another performance . . . 598 Thanos5150 29-May-16 15:03
Focus on the axiom 534 Origyptian 29-May-16 15:27
Re: Focus on everything BUT the facts 620 DScribr 29-May-16 15:41
Re: Focus on everything BUT the facts 497 cladking 29-May-16 17:29
Re: Focus on the axiom 479 Thanos5150 30-May-16 01:49
Re: Focus on the axiom 549 Origyptian 30-May-16 05:32
Re: Focus on the axiom 537 Thanos5150 31-May-16 02:35
Re: Focus on the axiom 564 Origyptian 31-May-16 06:41
Re: Focus on the axiom 574 Thanos5150 01-Jun-16 00:28
Re: Focus on reality. 528 DScribr 01-Jun-16 00:51
Re: Focus on the axiom 520 Origyptian 01-Jun-16 06:20
Re: Focus on the axiom 566 Thanos5150 02-Jun-16 03:08
Re: Focus on the axiom 535 cladking 02-Jun-16 04:00
Re: Focus on the axiom 477 Origyptian 02-Jun-16 04:25
Re: Focus on the axiom 485 Thanos5150 02-Jun-16 16:34
Re: Focus on the axiom 500 cladking 02-Jun-16 18:20
Re: Focus on the axiom 554 Origyptian 03-Jun-16 18:04
Re: Focus on the axiom 549 R Avry Wilson 03-Jun-16 18:43
Re: Focus on the axiom 537 Origyptian 03-Jun-16 21:24
Re: Focus on the axiom 529 Corpuscles 03-Jun-16 23:59
Re: Focus on the axiom 392 Origyptian 04-Jun-16 06:29
Re: Focus on the axiom 456 R Avry Wilson 04-Jun-16 00:12
Re: Focus on the axiom 449 Origyptian 04-Jun-16 07:02
Re: Focus on the axiom 566 Jon Ellison 04-Jun-16 10:18
Re: Focus on the axiom 509 R Avry Wilson 05-Jun-16 04:15
Re: Focus on the axiom 528 Martin Stower 03-Jun-16 22:28
Re: Focus on the axiom 519 cladking 03-Jun-16 22:51
Re: Focus on the axiom 647 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 01:08
Re: Focus on the axiom 532 Origyptian 05-Jun-16 01:25
Re: Focus on the axiom 569 Thanos5150 05-Jun-16 04:15
Re: Focus on the axiom 530 Origyptian 05-Jun-16 17:29
Re: Focus on the axiom 565 Martin Stower 05-Jun-16 19:35
Re: Focus on the axiom 576 Origyptian 05-Jun-16 22:48
Re: Focus on the axiom 495 Martin Stower 05-Jun-16 23:47
Re: Focus on the axiom 540 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 00:54
Re: Focus on the axiom 500 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 01:01
Re: Focus on the axiom 541 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 01:05
Re: Focus on the axiom 537 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 02:40
Re: Focus on the axiom 555 R Avry Wilson 06-Jun-16 03:39
Re: Focus on the axiom 464 Audrey 06-Jun-16 04:59
Re: Focus on the axiom 451 Jon Ellison 06-Jun-16 07:59
Re: Focus on the axiom 478 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 14:00
Re: Focus on the axiom 525 cladking 06-Jun-16 16:13
Re: Focus on the axiom 486 Corpuscles 07-Jun-16 00:20
Re: Focus on the axiom 532 Origyptian 07-Jun-16 02:55
Re: Focus on the axiom 473 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 15:33
Re: Focus on the axiom 436 Warwick 06-Jun-16 16:17
Re: Focus on the axiom 549 Audrey 06-Jun-16 16:39
Re: Focus on the axiom 544 Warwick 06-Jun-16 16:58
Re: Focus on the axiom 451 Audrey 06-Jun-16 17:46
Re: Focus on the axiom 485 Warwick 06-Jun-16 18:13
Re: Focus on the axiom 422 Audrey 06-Jun-16 23:44
Read what I wrote 438 Warwick 07-Jun-16 17:15
Re: Read what I wrote 468 Audrey 08-Jun-16 00:22
Re: Read what I wrote 461 Martin Stower 08-Jun-16 01:40
Re: Read what I wrote 622 Audrey 08-Jun-16 01:52
Re: Read what I wrote 493 Martin Stower 08-Jun-16 13:47
Vyse's veracity.... 477 Warwick 09-Jun-16 16:29
Re: Vyse's veracity.... 403 Audrey 09-Jun-16 16:51
Re: Vyse's veracity.... 511 Warwick 09-Jun-16 17:19
Re: Vyse's veracity.... 546 Audrey 09-Jun-16 17:45
Wilkinson's opinions 468 Warwick 09-Jun-16 18:47
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 482 Origyptian 09-Jun-16 20:57
Ori's opinions 634 DScribr 10-Jun-16 01:45
Re: The incredible Teflon Red Ochre 458 Thunderbird 10-Jun-16 04:07
Re: The incredible Teflon Red Ochre 581 Martin Stower 10-Jun-16 14:49
Re: The incredible Red Ochre lasted 4500 yrs. 498 DScribr 11-Jun-16 00:40
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 431 Martin Stower 10-Jun-16 02:28
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 418 Audrey 10-Jun-16 03:05
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 555 Martin Stower 10-Jun-16 14:09
Bibliography 491 Warwick 10-Jun-16 18:07
Re: Bibliography 506 Origyptian 10-Jun-16 18:35
Re: Bibliography 483 Warwick 10-Jun-16 20:01
Re: Bibliography 539 Origyptian 10-Jun-16 21:54
Re: Bibliography 557 Corpuscles 10-Jun-16 23:45
Re: Bibliography 368 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 17:01
Re: Bibliography 508 Corpuscles 11-Jun-16 22:36
Re: Bibliography 462 Audrey 11-Jun-16 23:08
Re: Bibliography 492 Corpuscles 11-Jun-16 23:26
Re: Bibliography 397 Audrey 12-Jun-16 02:30
Re: Bibliography 445 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 03:19
Re: Bibliography 391 Audrey 12-Jun-16 03:32
Re: Bibliography 433 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 03:40
Re: Bibliography 441 Audrey 12-Jun-16 03:50
Re: Bibliography 398 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 04:30
Re: Bibliography 392 Audrey 12-Jun-16 04:47
Re: Bibliography 369 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 05:02
Re: Bibliography 515 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 10:49
Re: Bibliography 467 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 15:56
Re: Bibliography 392 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 17:41
But Avry.. 441 Warwick 12-Jun-16 17:58
Re: But Avry.. 554 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 18:14
Re: But Avry.. 510 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:37
Re: But Avry.. 489 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 20:15
Re: But Avry.. 492 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:44
Re: But Avry.. 460 Warwick 12-Jun-16 18:59
Re: But Avry.. 452 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 20:11
This whole discussion is a boondoggle 520 DScribr 13-Jun-16 01:04
Re: This whole discussion is a boondoggle 499 Warwick 13-Jun-16 16:24
Re: Bibliography 373 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 10:28
Re: Bibliography 462 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 23:35
Re: Bibliography 487 Corpuscles 11-Jun-16 23:58
Re: Bibliography 465 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 00:48
Re: Bibliography 502 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 01:13
Re: Bibliography 541 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 01:33
Re: Bibliography 555 Martin Stower 11-Jun-16 02:05
Re: Bibliography 519 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 18:09
Re: Bibliography 509 Martin Stower 11-Jun-16 19:22
Re: Bibliography 456 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 19:56
Re: Bibliography 376 Martin Stower 11-Jun-16 20:47
Re: Bibliography 502 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:03
Re: Bibliography 483 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 00:22
Re: Bibliography 384 Audrey 12-Jun-16 01:58
Re: Bibliography 520 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 02:24
Re: Bibliography 434 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 12:23
Re: Bibliography 466 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 14:50
Re: Bibliography 479 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 16:46
Re: Bibliography 391 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:10
Re: Bibliography 484 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:18
Re: Bibliography 476 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 00:35
Re: Bibliography 540 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:39
Re: Bibliography 433 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 01:23
Re: Bibliography 438 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 02:18
Re: Bibliography 388 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 13:55
Re: Bibliography 455 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 15:45
Re: Bibliography 482 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 17:32
Re: Bibliography 430 Warwick 12-Jun-16 17:41
Re: Bibliography 484 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 18:08
Re: Bibliography 473 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:48
Re: Bibliography 470 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:35
Re: Bibliography 424 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 19:09
Gonna ignore the noise and try again 470 Warwick 12-Jun-16 19:53
Re: Gonna ignore the noise and try again 478 Thunderbird 12-Jun-16 20:18
Re: Gonna ignore the noise and try again 436 Audrey 12-Jun-16 21:04