Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Corpuscles Wrote:
> > Davison's Chamber (there is no 'd' in the name)
> > was discovered in 1765, what do you mean by
> 1000
> > yrs of visits?
> Isn't there a "d" well there you go. Two bravos!
It's not a big deal, I don't rub people's noses into minor spelling errors.
> It was not (unless I am mistaken) made in 1765 and
> the thinkin is that al Mamoun breached G1 in circa
> 800CE
I hadn't heard that Mamoun found the first chamber. Interesting, where did you hear this?
> To be fake!!!! Is that your currently held
> postion? then the "fakers" would have had to
> do what I describe in the first part.
Are you asking me if I think they're fake?
They wouldn't have to learn anything. All they had to do was talk to Wilkinson, he had already announced which cartouche belonged to Suphis/Cheops. In fact, he also announced which cartouche belonged to Suphis' brother, or successor, which is the other cartouche found in the chambers. A perfect discovery, cartouches of builders of G1 AND G2 were found! I hear Champollion also had speculated on the same cartouche being that of Suphis, but I've been unable to verify.
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Corpuscles Wrote:
> > Davison's Chamber (there is no 'd' in the name)
> > was discovered in 1765, what do you mean by
> 1000
> > yrs of visits?
> Isn't there a "d" well there you go. Two bravos!
It's not a big deal, I don't rub people's noses into minor spelling errors.
> It was not (unless I am mistaken) made in 1765 and
> the thinkin is that al Mamoun breached G1 in circa
> 800CE
I hadn't heard that Mamoun found the first chamber. Interesting, where did you hear this?
> To be fake!!!! Is that your currently held
> postion? then the "fakers" would have had to
> do what I describe in the first part.
Are you asking me if I think they're fake?
They wouldn't have to learn anything. All they had to do was talk to Wilkinson, he had already announced which cartouche belonged to Suphis/Cheops. In fact, he also announced which cartouche belonged to Suphis' brother, or successor, which is the other cartouche found in the chambers. A perfect discovery, cartouches of builders of G1 AND G2 were found! I hear Champollion also had speculated on the same cartouche being that of Suphis, but I've been unable to verify.
He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius