Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Warwick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Vyse' methodology, whether primitive sophisticated
> or just plain all over the place...has no bearing
> on the issue.
It most certainly does. It could otherwise be called 'motive'.
> The glyphs are found in a spot where they could
> not have been placed after the fact.
That is not true. If you can crouch down to touch it, to photograph it, it is most possible to paint "after the fact".
Why do you come to this conclusion?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Vyse' methodology, whether primitive sophisticated
> or just plain all over the place...has no bearing
> on the issue.
It most certainly does. It could otherwise be called 'motive'.
> The glyphs are found in a spot where they could
> not have been placed after the fact.
That is not true. If you can crouch down to touch it, to photograph it, it is most possible to paint "after the fact".
Why do you come to this conclusion?
He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius
