Audrey Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Warwick Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > I don't admire Vyse's methodology at all. It's the
> > > > methodology being applied to the question
> > > > Vyse's veracity that I find Bankrupt
> >
> > do you actually read anything I post or just hit
> > the off the deep end button automatically?
>
> Then by all means, demonstrate your methodology
> for verifying Vyse's veracity. Show us how it's
> properly done. I'm all ears.

Just so’s we’re on the same page, perhaps you could demonstrate your methodology for verifying the veracity of anything? You’ll need it to verify the veracity of whatever is used to verify Vyse’s veracity.

Heard of a justificatory regress?

You’ll need it also to verify the veracity of any source you rely on in questioning Vyse’s veracity. I’ve not noticed you approaching this methodically and it seems to me that you simply accept whatever you like the sound of.

Verification that this is not so might help us to take your request more seriously.

M.