Audrey Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Warwick Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I'm not saying any such thing. I have stated
> that
> > accusing a dynamiter of subtlety is a stretch.
> I
> > don't admire Vyse's methodology at all. It's
> the
> > methodology being applied to the question of
> > Vyse's veracity that I find Bankrupt
>
> Vyse's motives shouldn't be questioned? Is this
> taboo? Is he beyond reproach?
>
> > WE?? A little over the top with that 'WE'
>
> Then who were you including when you said "We"?
>
> > If you are going to defend a theory you must
> first
> > realise where that theory came from. There
> where
> > enough questions of his OCT that a situation
> was
> > created where many people thought that
> tweaking
> > the theory to deal with those questions, would
> > create a more palatable theory.
>
> Have no idea why you bring this up other than
> maybe you think all alts subscribe to the OCT. I'm
> fully aware of Scott's position on the OCT. So
> what?
>
> > But the parrots all failed to include the prime
> > denominator ....the Beliefs of the AEs and the
> > role of the King within them.
>
> Because the parrots aren't following the zombies
> who believe the assumptions Egyptologists have
> made. Sounds like you belittle anyone who does not
> conform to the establishment.
>
> > Scott came up with that theory that most
> appealed
> > to the 'anyone but the AE's' crowd. But is was
> > Robert who did the real work for him.
>
> "We" know who did what work. Scott tried to verify
> the OCT. You twist it to mean it was only self
> serving PR work.
>
> > 100's of insulting posts??? Maybe just maybe
> that
> > n umber in 15 years
>
> Over 1200 posts, how many would you estimate to be
> nothing more than insults? Lets estimate on the
> low side, say 20%. That would be a conservative
> 240 which is more than 100, making it plural at
> "hundreds".
>
> > I am however confident that I have received
> > exponentially more than I have given.
> >
> >
> > Thank you in advance for at least one more
>
> No, your perceptions are not correct.


"I don't admire Vyse's methodology at all"




do you actually read anything I post or just hit the off the deep end button automatically?


Warwick