Audrey Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Warwick Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > At the end of the day, all Martin, Avry,
> yourself,
> > a number of others, even I, can hope to do Via
> > posting here, is defend proper methodology.
> >
> > It's not YOUR fault that , in this instance,
> your
> > dealing with the intellectually bankrupt.
>
> Are you saying Reisner used proper methodology?
> And that proper methodology has always been used
> from the Christians to today?
>
> The fact remains Reisner made up a story, one of
> many made up stories in Egyptology. It would seem
> it is he who was intellectually bankrupt if not
> also emotionally bankrupt and possibly even
> physically and financially bankrupt. Reisner was
> incompetent, he should be held accountable. His
> fabrication used, as you and your crew have
> admitted, a typical methodology that was/is
> flawed.
>
> It's not our fault Egyptologists have a need to
> fabricate history. You cannot correct Reisner's
> screw up by firing at the alts. You will most
> certainly fail with this 'methodology' of shooting
> the messenger.


What a number of us are trying to point out is that Reisner's methodology has no bearing on Vyse's. Other than the subject matter they were investigating they had very little in common other than English as their Mother tongue.

The only way Scott can deal with the facts is to change them. he couldn't find his Podex, so he has to undiscover all those indices that he wrong.

Vyse
the little statue
totally ignores the volumes of commentary from history regarding the causeway and it's reliefs
buys into theSphinx debate merely to hint at the possibility that the authors of his Podex existed at sometime.
etc etc ad nauseum
WE won't get inot the number of times RB has objected to his hijacking of his theories

Never wanted to shoot the messenger. Just the message


Warwick