Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> R Avry Wilson Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Philip,
> >
> > Fine then. In your own words (brevity
> requested),
> > why are bringing up this whole Reisner affair?
>
> Reisner's report of the Tomb of Heterpheres is an
> example of a low standard of proof, a point I've
> already stated in several posts to you in these
> discussions, for example
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 50359,1051714#msg-1051714]here[/url] and also in
> the
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 50359,1052375#msg-1052375]post you just replied
> to[/url]!
Excellent. Thanks. This whole Reisner affair is presented as 'an example of a low standard of proof'.
As we all know, examples are provided in an effort to further explain a statement. So I ask you, what related statement are you giving us the Reisner example for? What specific act of 'low standard of proof' are you therefore supporting with this example?
-------------------------------------------------------
> R Avry Wilson Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Philip,
> >
> > Fine then. In your own words (brevity
> requested),
> > why are bringing up this whole Reisner affair?
>
> Reisner's report of the Tomb of Heterpheres is an
> example of a low standard of proof, a point I've
> already stated in several posts to you in these
> discussions, for example
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 50359,1051714#msg-1051714]here[/url] and also in
> the
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 50359,1052375#msg-1052375]post you just replied
> to[/url]!
Excellent. Thanks. This whole Reisner affair is presented as 'an example of a low standard of proof'.
As we all know, examples are provided in an effort to further explain a statement. So I ask you, what related statement are you giving us the Reisner example for? What specific act of 'low standard of proof' are you therefore supporting with this example?
