Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> R Avry Wilson Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Philip,
> >
> > Fine then. In your own words (brevity
> requested),
> > why are bringing up this whole Reisner affair?
>
> Reisner's report of the Tomb of Heterpheres is an
> example of a low standard of proof, a point I've
> already stated in several posts to you in these
> discussions, for example
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 50359,1051714#msg-1051714]here[/url] and also in
> the
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 50359,1052375#msg-1052375]post you just replied
> to[/url]!
I see, you are using it as a prime example of the lower standards of proof that existed back then for 'Whatever' reason..
Lower standards that would not be acceptable today.
Which pretty much sums up part of what science is, always having to be re examined and re appraised therefore fueling progress.
Bigger, better, faster..
-------------------------------------------------------
> R Avry Wilson Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Philip,
> >
> > Fine then. In your own words (brevity
> requested),
> > why are bringing up this whole Reisner affair?
>
> Reisner's report of the Tomb of Heterpheres is an
> example of a low standard of proof, a point I've
> already stated in several posts to you in these
> discussions, for example
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 50359,1051714#msg-1051714]here[/url] and also in
> the
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 50359,1052375#msg-1052375]post you just replied
> to[/url]!
I see, you are using it as a prime example of the lower standards of proof that existed back then for 'Whatever' reason..
Lower standards that would not be acceptable today.
Which pretty much sums up part of what science is, always having to be re examined and re appraised therefore fueling progress.
Bigger, better, faster..