Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > Origyptian Wrote:
> >
> > > I'm the one twisting things here?!
> > > Hilarious.
> >
> > Yes, Femano, you are the one twisting things
> > here—and it’s not hilarious. It’s shabby
> > and contemptible and really rather sad.
> >
> > Were you not operating under a cognitive deficit,
> > it would strike you that poor, overworked Höfer
> > getting just one thing wrong is really
> > rather odd. I quantified to cover what you seemed
> > to be saying: that poor, tired Höfer made more
> > than one mistake, as poor, tired people tend to do.
> >
> > Does it account for your posts here, by the way?
> >
> > M.
>
> So you dug up a SINGLE obscure article that
> oddly constitutes "ALL the
> misreporting"
you've been kicking and
> scratching about that's made you lunge into such
> intense character assassination against me and
> that "bungling criminal liar" Görlitz.

So I need to quote you directly?

“. . . Höfer . . . certainly may [sic] have overextended himself, feverishly writing copy for various media venues, and at least once confused the phyle [sic] glyphs [sic] at the far end of the chamber . . .”

Here:

http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1050359,1050751#msg-1050751

You’re the one saying “at least once” and you’re the one painting a scenario in which multiple errors would be the natural expectation.

All of which is a mere diversion from my key point above, that poor, overworked Höfer making just the one mistake—while being on the ball about everything else—refutes the claim implied that Höfer was in an error-prone condition due to overextending himself, “feverishly” writing copy etc.

You’d have us believe that Höfer, in presenting the crucial “fact” of the matter—the USP of the entire exercise—on a crowdsourcing site which has stated standards of accuracy, didn’t bother getting it right—and Görlitz and Erdmann didn’t bother checking. It’s a bit like a news anchor in 1963 reporting that Jackie Kennedy had been shot.

And what’s with the weasel word “obscure”? What makes the site obscure? That it’s in German? Need I remind you that Görlitz and Erdmann and Höfer are German? Why would they not use a German site? If it were obscure, what would that prove?—and as a matter of fact, it isn’t. It’s the crowdsourcing site: it’s how they solicited donations and evidently not so obscure to Germans. Höfer used the same copy on YouTube: are you going to try telling us that that’s an obscure site?

Added: Wikipedia on Indiegogo:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiegogo

The site is international—and the word I should be using is “crowdfunding”.

“Fifteen million people from all around the world visit the site on a monthly basis.” Not so obscure, then.

> And you STILL refuse to tell us whether it
> was Görlitz or Erdmann that you believe surely
> must have approved the
> figure caption that erroneously claims
> Görlitz is pointing to Khufu's cartouche in the photo.

What is this drivel? Are you in your dotage?

http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1050359,1050764#msg-1050764

Quote

Excuse me? Görlitz and Erdmann have editorial control over an Australian news site?

Is this really what you meant to suggest?

For your information, the image (without decoration) appears at [the] Abora site much as I found it in January 2014:

http://www.abora.eu/index.php?id=2371&no_cache=1

You will see that it appears with this caption:

“Die Untersuchung der widersprüchlichen Vyse Kartusche von 1837 in der obersten Entlastungskammer.”

I assume that Görlitz approved this one, it being his site.

I have no obligation to state beliefs which exist only in your fantasies.

> And yet you claim I'm the one with
> the cognitive disorder.

And you’ve just proven it.

> You're right. It's not hilarious anymore.

Seek qualified medical help. You should at the very least get a memory assessment.

M.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 22-May-16 16:38 by Martin Stower.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Creighton Persists Part 2 4227 JonnyMcA 19-May-16 14:30
That chemical analysis . . . 739 Martin Stower 19-May-16 17:30
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 660 Origyptian 19-May-16 20:50
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 638 Jon Ellison 19-May-16 21:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 610 Martin Stower 19-May-16 22:01
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 599 Martin Stower 19-May-16 21:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 574 Origyptian 19-May-16 22:12
The unfounded accusations continue..... 694 DScribr 19-May-16 22:46
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 678 Martin Stower 20-May-16 00:14
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 596 Thanos5150 20-May-16 00:35
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 498 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 01:57
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 602 Origyptian 20-May-16 02:47
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 487 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 03:20
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 570 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:10
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 602 DScribr 20-May-16 23:23
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 586 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 23:35
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 568 DScribr 20-May-16 23:40
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 540 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:07
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 446 DScribr 20-May-16 02:58
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 593 Martin Stower 19-May-16 22:55
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 597 DScribr 19-May-16 22:43
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 597 Martin Stower 19-May-16 23:30
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 638 Origyptian 20-May-16 02:48
The lack of analysis . . . 699 DScribr 20-May-16 03:05
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 632 Audrey 20-May-16 04:13
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 562 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 06:58
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 590 DScribr 20-May-16 23:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 719 Origyptian 20-May-16 15:46
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 544 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 547 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 586 Martin Stower 21-May-16 02:07
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 570 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 06:43
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 586 Origyptian 21-May-16 14:58
So much for chemical analysis . . . 572 DScribr 21-May-16 19:54
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 573 Martin Stower 21-May-16 22:49
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 564 Martin Stower 21-May-16 23:00
Re: What's the end game with this? 670 Thunderbird 20-May-16 17:20
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 566 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 553 Audrey 20-May-16 22:43
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 507 Martin Stower 20-May-16 22:54
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 547 Audrey 20-May-16 23:12
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 488 Martin Stower 20-May-16 23:52
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 567 Audrey 21-May-16 00:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 638 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:45
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 484 DScribr 21-May-16 01:35
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 429 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:06
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 514 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 585 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:36
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 779 Martin Stower 21-May-16 02:49
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 630 Martin Stower 20-May-16 18:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 635 Origyptian 20-May-16 20:00
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 545 Thanos5150 20-May-16 20:13
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 577 Origyptian 20-May-16 21:03
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 572 Martin Stower 20-May-16 23:44
Höfer and Görlitz meet Stein 514 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:36
Re: Höfer and Görlitz meet Stein 488 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:23
Re: Höfer and Görlitz meet Stein 703 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:55
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 558 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:34
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 578 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:15
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 502 Origyptian 21-May-16 04:08
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 570 Martin Stower 21-May-16 23:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 670 Origyptian 22-May-16 00:09
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 523 Martin Stower 22-May-16 00:49
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 615 Origyptian 22-May-16 00:57
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 588 Origyptian 22-May-16 01:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 573 Jon Ellison 22-May-16 01:14
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 604 Martin Stower 22-May-16 01:51
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 556 Origyptian 22-May-16 04:21
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 605 Martin Stower 22-May-16 14:20
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 561 Origyptian 22-May-16 17:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 616 Martin Stower 22-May-16 18:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 571 Origyptian 22-May-16 20:34
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 497 Martin Stower 22-May-16 21:30
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 596 Origyptian 22-May-16 23:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 616 Martin Stower 23-May-16 00:03
Re: That chemical analysis is all but forgotten...... 553 DScribr 23-May-16 03:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 593 Richard Fusniak 21-May-16 08:47
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 566 Origyptian 21-May-16 13:26
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 534 Martin Stower 22-May-16 00:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 560 Origyptian 22-May-16 00:50
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 589 Martin Stower 22-May-16 01:39
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 486 Origyptian 22-May-16 04:45
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 498 Martin Stower 22-May-16 16:13
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 493 Martin Stower 21-May-16 22:44
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 699 Origyptian 21-May-16 23:58
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 545 Martin Stower 22-May-16 01:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 781 Martin Stower 20-May-16 22:44
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 543 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:41
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 616 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 616 Origyptian 21-May-16 04:14
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 458 Martin Stower 21-May-16 23:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 605 Thanos5150 19-May-16 22:50
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 582 Martin Stower 19-May-16 23:18
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 488 DScribr 20-May-16 03:07
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 585 Origyptian 20-May-16 02:52
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 527 DScribr 20-May-16 03:12
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 597 Thanos5150 20-May-16 05:20
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 494 Origyptian 20-May-16 13:36
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 610 Thanos5150 20-May-16 17:57
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 601 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 18:56
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 587 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:23
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 658 Thanos5150 20-May-16 19:27
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 522 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 19:29
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 555 Audrey 20-May-16 21:02
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 573 Origyptian 20-May-16 21:12
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 549 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 21:26
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 619 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:08
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 620 Audrey 20-May-16 22:34
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 506 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:36
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 607 Audrey 20-May-16 22:47
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 499 Thanos5150 20-May-16 23:00
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 518 Audrey 20-May-16 23:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 497 Thanos5150 21-May-16 00:01
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 514 Audrey 21-May-16 00:23
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 564 Thanos5150 21-May-16 03:14
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 554 Audrey 21-May-16 05:02
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 498 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 09:10
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 622 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 09:28
The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 682 DScribr 21-May-16 13:37
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 504 Origyptian 21-May-16 13:56
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 548 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 17:48
Willful ignorance continues....... 587 DScribr 21-May-16 19:49
Re: Willful ignorance continues....... 608 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 21:28
Re: Stealing IS a crime! Willful ignorance continues....... 502 DScribr 22-May-16 00:39
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 601 Richard Fusniak 21-May-16 18:17
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 477 DScribr 21-May-16 19:57
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 605 Richard Fusniak 21-May-16 20:24
Stealing IS A Crime!!! 586 DScribr 22-May-16 00:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 580 Origyptian 21-May-16 15:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 498 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 17:53
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 557 Origyptian 21-May-16 21:39
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 559 Jon Ellison 22-May-16 00:46
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 509 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:09
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 593 Audrey 21-May-16 00:26
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 589 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 556 Audrey 21-May-16 01:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 629 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:41
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 576 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 11:00
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 545 DScribr 21-May-16 01:44
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 542 Origyptian 20-May-16 19:25
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 556 Thanos5150 20-May-16 19:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 506 Origyptian 20-May-16 20:35
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 584 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:03
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 506 Origyptian 20-May-16 22:38
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 584 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:52
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 522 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 594 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:05
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 519 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:27
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 539 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 525 Audrey 21-May-16 01:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 645 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:34
Pending statement from Dr. Gorlitz 871 Richard Fusniak 20-May-16 12:04
Re: Pending statement from Dr. Gorlitz 616 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:25
Martin Persists 656 drrayeye 23-May-16 01:30
Re: Martin Persists 634 Martin Stower 23-May-16 12:01
Re: Martin Persists 494 R Avry Wilson 24-May-16 19:58
Mainstream Persists 646 DScribr 25-May-16 00:56
Re: Martin Persists 714 Merrell 28-May-16 09:00
Re: Martin Persists 546 Martin Stower 28-May-16 11:11
as long as we are counting 645 Warwick 25-May-16 16:42
Re: as long as we are counting 605 DScribr 26-May-16 01:53
Re: as long as we are counting 643 cladking 26-May-16 16:57
Re: as long as we are counting 567 Martin Stower 26-May-16 17:31
Re: as long as we are counting 572 Origyptian 26-May-16 17:40
Re: as long as we are counting 510 cladking 27-May-16 00:21
Re: as long as we are counting 582 Warwick 27-May-16 01:27
Re: as long as we are counting 395 Origyptian 27-May-16 02:53
And work hard at obfuscation. 466 DScribr 27-May-16 00:57
Re: And work hard at obfuscation. 528 cladking 27-May-16 02:55
Re: as long as we are counting 506 Warwick 27-May-16 01:29
Re: as long as we are counting 600 cladking 27-May-16 02:59
Re: as long as we are counting 580 Warwick 27-May-16 03:35
Re: as long as we are counting 557 Audrey 27-May-16 04:32
Re: as long as we are counting 545 Warwick 27-May-16 05:34
Re: as long as we are counting 613 cladking 27-May-16 13:35
Re: as long as we are counting 569 Warwick 27-May-16 14:56
The original page on Indiegogo etc. 655 Martin Stower 25-May-16 22:10
Another performance . . . 553 Martin Stower 26-May-16 13:47
Re: Another performance . . . 497 Warwick 26-May-16 13:57
Re: Another performance . . . 440 Origyptian 26-May-16 14:53
Re: Another performance . . . 540 Martin Stower 26-May-16 16:09
Re: Another performance . . . 543 cladking 26-May-16 16:18
Re: Another performance . . . 454 Martin Stower 26-May-16 16:31
Re: Another performance . . . 813 cladking 26-May-16 17:54
Re: Another performance . . . 609 Martin Stower 26-May-16 18:29
Re: Another performance . . . 431 cladking 26-May-16 23:52
Re: Another performance . . . 618 eyeofhorus33 26-May-16 19:00
Re: Another performance . . . 468 cladking 27-May-16 00:05
Re: Another performance . . . 510 Audrey 27-May-16 00:23
Re: Another performance . . . 493 Warwick 27-May-16 01:42
Re: Another performance . . . 579 cladking 27-May-16 02:07
Re: Another performance . . . 520 Warwick 27-May-16 02:15
Re: Another performance . . . 555 cladking 27-May-16 02:48
Re: Another performance . . . 530 Warwick 27-May-16 03:48
Re: Another performance . . . 591 cladking 27-May-16 03:53
Re: Another performance . . . 615 Warwick 27-May-16 05:41
Re: Another performance . . . 520 Audrey 27-May-16 04:51
Re: Another performance . . . 571 Warwick 27-May-16 05:18
NOT Primitive, Low-Tech 508 DScribr 28-May-16 14:09
Re: NOT Primitive, Low-Tech 558 cladking 28-May-16 14:31
Re: Another performance . . . 591 Thanos5150 26-May-16 16:38
Re: Another performance . . . 484 cladking 26-May-16 16:44
Re: Another performance . . . 571 Origyptian 26-May-16 17:33
Re: Another performance . . . 600 cladking 26-May-16 17:40
Re: Another performance . . . 576 Martin Stower 26-May-16 17:49
Re: Another performance . . . 599 cladking 27-May-16 00:15
Re: Another performance . . . 582 Martin Stower 27-May-16 19:17
Re: Another performance . . . 600 Warwick 27-May-16 20:00
Re: Another performance . . . 521 cladking 27-May-16 20:21
Re: Another performance . . . 634 Martin Stower 27-May-16 23:06
Re: Oops....we missed the Basalt flooring and machine disc cuts 438 Thunderbird 27-May-16 23:28
Re: Oops....we missed the Basalt flooring and machine disc cuts 627 Martin Stower 27-May-16 23:41
Re: Another performance . . . 579 cladking 28-May-16 00:33
Re: Another performance . . . 588 Martin Stower 28-May-16 00:59
Re: Another performance . . . 557 cladking 28-May-16 02:36
Re: Another performance . . . 547 Martin Stower 28-May-16 23:55
Re: Another performance . . . 466 cladking 29-May-16 01:23
Re: Another performance . . . 514 Martin Stower 29-May-16 19:35
Re: Another performance . . . 681 cladking 29-May-16 20:43
Re: Another performance . . . 573 R Avry Wilson 28-May-16 02:39
Re: Another performance . . . 597 cladking 28-May-16 03:41
Re: Another performance . . . 540 Thanos5150 28-May-16 06:20
Re: Another performance . . . 604 cladking 28-May-16 13:40
Re: Another performance . . . 577 Origyptian 28-May-16 15:04
Re: Another performance . . . 559 Jon Ellison 28-May-16 16:38
Re: Another performance . . . 427 cladking 28-May-16 17:52
Re: Another performance . . . 528 Jon Ellison 28-May-16 17:58
Re: Another performance . . . 455 Origyptian 29-May-16 02:51
Re: Another performance . . . 473 cladking 29-May-16 03:08
Re: Another performance . . . 539 Origyptian 29-May-16 04:03
Re: Another performance . . . 551 Thanos5150 29-May-16 05:03
Re: Another performance . . . 577 Origyptian 29-May-16 13:18
Re: Another performance . . . 598 Thanos5150 29-May-16 15:03
Focus on the axiom 534 Origyptian 29-May-16 15:27
Re: Focus on everything BUT the facts 620 DScribr 29-May-16 15:41
Re: Focus on everything BUT the facts 497 cladking 29-May-16 17:29
Re: Focus on the axiom 479 Thanos5150 30-May-16 01:49
Re: Focus on the axiom 549 Origyptian 30-May-16 05:32
Re: Focus on the axiom 537 Thanos5150 31-May-16 02:35
Re: Focus on the axiom 564 Origyptian 31-May-16 06:41
Re: Focus on the axiom 574 Thanos5150 01-Jun-16 00:28
Re: Focus on reality. 528 DScribr 01-Jun-16 00:51
Re: Focus on the axiom 520 Origyptian 01-Jun-16 06:20
Re: Focus on the axiom 566 Thanos5150 02-Jun-16 03:08
Re: Focus on the axiom 535 cladking 02-Jun-16 04:00
Re: Focus on the axiom 477 Origyptian 02-Jun-16 04:25
Re: Focus on the axiom 485 Thanos5150 02-Jun-16 16:34
Re: Focus on the axiom 500 cladking 02-Jun-16 18:20
Re: Focus on the axiom 554 Origyptian 03-Jun-16 18:04
Re: Focus on the axiom 549 R Avry Wilson 03-Jun-16 18:43
Re: Focus on the axiom 537 Origyptian 03-Jun-16 21:24
Re: Focus on the axiom 529 Corpuscles 03-Jun-16 23:59
Re: Focus on the axiom 392 Origyptian 04-Jun-16 06:29
Re: Focus on the axiom 456 R Avry Wilson 04-Jun-16 00:12
Re: Focus on the axiom 449 Origyptian 04-Jun-16 07:02
Re: Focus on the axiom 566 Jon Ellison 04-Jun-16 10:18
Re: Focus on the axiom 509 R Avry Wilson 05-Jun-16 04:15
Re: Focus on the axiom 528 Martin Stower 03-Jun-16 22:28
Re: Focus on the axiom 519 cladking 03-Jun-16 22:51
Re: Focus on the axiom 647 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 01:08
Re: Focus on the axiom 532 Origyptian 05-Jun-16 01:25
Re: Focus on the axiom 569 Thanos5150 05-Jun-16 04:15
Re: Focus on the axiom 530 Origyptian 05-Jun-16 17:29
Re: Focus on the axiom 565 Martin Stower 05-Jun-16 19:35
Re: Focus on the axiom 576 Origyptian 05-Jun-16 22:48
Re: Focus on the axiom 495 Martin Stower 05-Jun-16 23:47
Re: Focus on the axiom 540 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 00:54
Re: Focus on the axiom 500 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 01:01
Re: Focus on the axiom 541 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 01:05
Re: Focus on the axiom 537 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 02:40
Re: Focus on the axiom 555 R Avry Wilson 06-Jun-16 03:39
Re: Focus on the axiom 464 Audrey 06-Jun-16 04:59
Re: Focus on the axiom 451 Jon Ellison 06-Jun-16 07:59
Re: Focus on the axiom 478 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 14:00
Re: Focus on the axiom 525 cladking 06-Jun-16 16:13
Re: Focus on the axiom 486 Corpuscles 07-Jun-16 00:20
Re: Focus on the axiom 532 Origyptian 07-Jun-16 02:55
Re: Focus on the axiom 473 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 15:33
Re: Focus on the axiom 436 Warwick 06-Jun-16 16:17
Re: Focus on the axiom 549 Audrey 06-Jun-16 16:39
Re: Focus on the axiom 544 Warwick 06-Jun-16 16:58
Re: Focus on the axiom 451 Audrey 06-Jun-16 17:46
Re: Focus on the axiom 485 Warwick 06-Jun-16 18:13
Re: Focus on the axiom 422 Audrey 06-Jun-16 23:44
Read what I wrote 438 Warwick 07-Jun-16 17:15
Re: Read what I wrote 468 Audrey 08-Jun-16 00:22
Re: Read what I wrote 461 Martin Stower 08-Jun-16 01:40
Re: Read what I wrote 622 Audrey 08-Jun-16 01:52
Re: Read what I wrote 492 Martin Stower 08-Jun-16 13:47
Vyse's veracity.... 477 Warwick 09-Jun-16 16:29
Re: Vyse's veracity.... 403 Audrey 09-Jun-16 16:51
Re: Vyse's veracity.... 511 Warwick 09-Jun-16 17:19
Re: Vyse's veracity.... 546 Audrey 09-Jun-16 17:45
Wilkinson's opinions 468 Warwick 09-Jun-16 18:47
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 482 Origyptian 09-Jun-16 20:57
Ori's opinions 634 DScribr 10-Jun-16 01:45
Re: The incredible Teflon Red Ochre 458 Thunderbird 10-Jun-16 04:07
Re: The incredible Teflon Red Ochre 581 Martin Stower 10-Jun-16 14:49
Re: The incredible Red Ochre lasted 4500 yrs. 498 DScribr 11-Jun-16 00:40
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 431 Martin Stower 10-Jun-16 02:28
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 418 Audrey 10-Jun-16 03:05
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 555 Martin Stower 10-Jun-16 14:09
Bibliography 491 Warwick 10-Jun-16 18:07
Re: Bibliography 506 Origyptian 10-Jun-16 18:35
Re: Bibliography 483 Warwick 10-Jun-16 20:01
Re: Bibliography 539 Origyptian 10-Jun-16 21:54
Re: Bibliography 557 Corpuscles 10-Jun-16 23:45
Re: Bibliography 368 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 17:01
Re: Bibliography 508 Corpuscles 11-Jun-16 22:36
Re: Bibliography 462 Audrey 11-Jun-16 23:08
Re: Bibliography 492 Corpuscles 11-Jun-16 23:26
Re: Bibliography 397 Audrey 12-Jun-16 02:30
Re: Bibliography 445 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 03:19
Re: Bibliography 391 Audrey 12-Jun-16 03:32
Re: Bibliography 433 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 03:40
Re: Bibliography 441 Audrey 12-Jun-16 03:50
Re: Bibliography 398 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 04:30
Re: Bibliography 392 Audrey 12-Jun-16 04:47
Re: Bibliography 369 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 05:02
Re: Bibliography 515 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 10:49
Re: Bibliography 467 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 15:56
Re: Bibliography 392 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 17:41
But Avry.. 441 Warwick 12-Jun-16 17:58
Re: But Avry.. 554 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 18:14
Re: But Avry.. 510 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:37
Re: But Avry.. 489 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 20:15
Re: But Avry.. 492 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:44
Re: But Avry.. 460 Warwick 12-Jun-16 18:59
Re: But Avry.. 452 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 20:11
This whole discussion is a boondoggle 520 DScribr 13-Jun-16 01:04
Re: This whole discussion is a boondoggle 499 Warwick 13-Jun-16 16:24
Re: Bibliography 373 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 10:28
Re: Bibliography 462 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 23:35
Re: Bibliography 487 Corpuscles 11-Jun-16 23:58
Re: Bibliography 465 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 00:48
Re: Bibliography 502 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 01:13
Re: Bibliography 541 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 01:33
Re: Bibliography 555 Martin Stower 11-Jun-16 02:05
Re: Bibliography 519 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 18:09
Re: Bibliography 509 Martin Stower 11-Jun-16 19:22
Re: Bibliography 456 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 19:56
Re: Bibliography 376 Martin Stower 11-Jun-16 20:47
Re: Bibliography 502 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:03
Re: Bibliography 483 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 00:22
Re: Bibliography 384 Audrey 12-Jun-16 01:58
Re: Bibliography 520 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 02:24
Re: Bibliography 434 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 12:23
Re: Bibliography 466 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 14:50
Re: Bibliography 479 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 16:46
Re: Bibliography 391 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:10
Re: Bibliography 484 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:18
Re: Bibliography 476 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 00:35
Re: Bibliography 540 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:39
Re: Bibliography 433 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 01:23
Re: Bibliography 437 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 02:18
Re: Bibliography 388 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 13:55
Re: Bibliography 455 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 15:45
Re: Bibliography 482 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 17:32
Re: Bibliography 430 Warwick 12-Jun-16 17:41
Re: Bibliography 484 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 18:08
Re: Bibliography 473 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:48
Re: Bibliography 470 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:35
Re: Bibliography 424 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 19:09
Gonna ignore the noise and try again 470 Warwick 12-Jun-16 19:53
Re: Gonna ignore the noise and try again 478 Thunderbird 12-Jun-16 20:18
Re: Gonna ignore the noise and try again 436 Audrey 12-Jun-16 21:04