Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > YOU were the one that brought Höfer
> > into this discussion. You needed him as your scapegoat . . .
>
> You have some objection to my bringing relevant
> facts into the discussion?
>
> As for the rest, it’s merely your usual BS.
> You’ve presented a purely speculative argument
> (what no “physical evidence”?)
> which puts all the blame on Höfer for what was
> said in the early publicity material, exculpating
> Görlitz and Erdmann arbitrarily and dogmatically
> and making Höfer the scapegoat in the
> case.
>
> Learn what words mean before you use them.

Well, here's an instant replay of your own hypothesis...

"In letting Höfer run the crowdsourcing campaign (from which they stood to profit), did Görlitz and Erdmann have no duty of care to make sure that the copy was sound?"
[grahamhancock.com]

"I mean, come on: how difficult is it in this day and ago for someone in one country to run copy past someone in another? The first preview of Das Cheops Projekt (on YouTube) and the original crowdsourcing campaign (on Indiegogo) both had text (identically worded) stating that the cartouche had been sampled. Are we really to believe that Görlitz and Erdmann looked at neither of them? Höfer remains a close associate of Görlitz at least. As Femano keeps telling us (in the hope that this red herring will lead us astray), he is not a topic expert. All the more reason to consult Görlitz and Erdmann and not just make things up off the top of his head."
[grahamhancock.com]
[www.indiegogo.com]

Sounds like a "purely speculative argument".

Meanwhile, [grahamhancock.com]

I think it's time to give this a rest.




Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 31-May-16 18:27 by Origyptian.