Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ...
> Whereas what you’re engaged in is an exercise in
> evasion and blaming the messenger: exculpating the
> crooks for whom you’ve appointed yourself
> apologist-in-chief by making Höfer the
> scapegoat.
I believe the record shows that it is you who are using Höfer as the scapegoat. And that's because you were unable to find anything by Görlitz or Erdmann stating that they sampled Khufu's cartouche after you said they contradicted themselves regarding where they took samples, so you had to bring Höfer into the fold and cite a solitary obscure web article. That's not my opinion; that's very clear in the progression of your posts in this discussion. For example:
> Have I mentioned that I find you morally disgusting?
How ironic.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 22-May-16 00:29 by Origyptian.
-------------------------------------------------------
> ...
> Whereas what you’re engaged in is an exercise in
> evasion and blaming the messenger: exculpating the
> crooks for whom you’ve appointed yourself
> apologist-in-chief by making Höfer the
> scapegoat.
I believe the record shows that it is you who are using Höfer as the scapegoat. And that's because you were unable to find anything by Görlitz or Erdmann stating that they sampled Khufu's cartouche after you said they contradicted themselves regarding where they took samples, so you had to bring Höfer into the fold and cite a solitary obscure web article. That's not my opinion; that's very clear in the progression of your posts in this discussion. For example:
- "Femano has failed all along to understand just how far “physical evidence” (so-called) depends on testimony. It needs chain of custody and Görlitz and Erdmann have no credibility on that. Taking the sample in the first place was a criminal act, Görlitz did not follow the correct sampling protocols and their statements about what they did are wildly contradictory: they sampled the cartouche/they did not sample the cartouche; it was not iron oxide (red ochre)/it was red ochre (iron oxide). Credibility zero."
> Have I mentioned that I find you morally disgusting?
How ironic.
______________________________________________________________
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 22-May-16 00:29 by Origyptian.
