Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Thanos5150 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > Did you ever say at any time before that you
> > believed the
> > > AE did not make any stoneware?
> >
> > See, this is where you seem to be making the
> > logical flaw. Saying "If they
> made
> > the vessels" is not the same as saying "they
> did
> > not make the vessels". The former
> is
> > an objective uncertainty based on lack of
> evidence
> > while leaving open the possibility. The latter
> is
> > a definitive statement of absolute denial.
> >
> > VERY big difference.
>
> Can't you just quote someone without
> misrepresenting them just one time? I did not say
> "So the mystery is not "if" the AE made
> the stone vessels" I said "So the
> mystery is not "if" the AE made stone vessels...".
> This is your comprehension flaw in that you have
> inserted a word to create a meaning it does not
> have. I am not reffering to specific vessels as I
> do not say "the" stone vessels, but rather left it
> at "stone vessels" which even Jon understood to
> mean "stone vessels at all". A further giveway,
> and the context of the statement, is the rest of
> the sentence which says:
>
> So to make it as simple as possible:the question
> is not "if" the AE made stone vessels it is why
> are the most awesome ones found at the earliest
> time. I have clearly made an attempt to separate
> the two. Got in now Lloyd?
Regardless of "the" or "any" stone vessels, how did they make them? With what tools? Where are they? It doesn't matter how you want to phrase it, if you are talking about this, or that, or ANY stone vessel. I say "if" because there is zero evidence.
If you are so sure you didn't offend anyone, then please clarify what you were referring to as being "incredibly stupid".
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 31-May-16 18:45 by Origyptian.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Thanos5150 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > Did you ever say at any time before that you
> > believed the
> > > AE did not make any stoneware?
> >
> > See, this is where you seem to be making the
> > logical flaw. Saying "If they
> made
> > the vessels" is not the same as saying "they
> did
> > not make the vessels". The former
> is
> > an objective uncertainty based on lack of
> evidence
> > while leaving open the possibility. The latter
> is
> > a definitive statement of absolute denial.
> >
> > VERY big difference.
>
> Can't you just quote someone without
> misrepresenting them just one time? I did not say
> "So the mystery is not "if" the AE made
> the stone vessels" I said "So the
> mystery is not "if" the AE made stone vessels...".
> This is your comprehension flaw in that you have
> inserted a word to create a meaning it does not
> have. I am not reffering to specific vessels as I
> do not say "the" stone vessels, but rather left it
> at "stone vessels" which even Jon understood to
> mean "stone vessels at all". A further giveway,
> and the context of the statement, is the rest of
> the sentence which says:
>
>Quote
...it is why does this quality appear
> suddenly in Archaic Dynastic times (Dynasty 00/0),
> hand in hand with monumental noble tombs and boat
> burials among other curiosities, so fully
> developed and of a quality that is unsurpassed
> in later times...
> So to make it as simple as possible:the question
> is not "if" the AE made stone vessels it is why
> are the most awesome ones found at the earliest
> time. I have clearly made an attempt to separate
> the two. Got in now Lloyd?
Regardless of "the" or "any" stone vessels, how did they make them? With what tools? Where are they? It doesn't matter how you want to phrase it, if you are talking about this, or that, or ANY stone vessel. I say "if" because there is zero evidence.
If you are so sure you didn't offend anyone, then please clarify what you were referring to as being "incredibly stupid".
______________________________________________________________
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 31-May-16 18:45 by Origyptian.
