Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Jon Ellison Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Audrey Wrote:
>
> > If Egyptology would do what needs to be done
> > people wouldn't be sneaking under the fence to
> get
> > the job done. As far as I'm concerned, they
> asked
> > for it. They hung a neon sign on G1 that said -
> > dare to find the truth.
>
> Any moral, legal or political implications are
> irrelevant.
> A sample was taken and a sample was analysed by a
> renowned lab.
> Results were obtained from that analyses.
> Even if those who took the sample are demonised
> and criminalised, it has no bearing whatsoever on
> the lab test results.
>
> It's pitiful that the SCA had not already carried
> out its own analyses, and if it already has, it's
> even more pitiful that those results have not yet
> been published.
>
> Is it a question of "two wrongs do not make a
> right" or "two wrongs make a right"?
> In this case knowledge was being denied, those who
> felt they were being denied that knowledge took
> action in order to gain that knowledge.
> It is legally and morally acceptable to repossess
> that which is yours and is being withheld from
> you.
> The physical samples have been returned.
> It's a question of ownership of, access to, and
> denial of knowledge.
> "Entrapment" varies by jurisdiction.
It's a question of how (un)reliable the test results and the source is.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Audrey Wrote:
>
> > If Egyptology would do what needs to be done
> > people wouldn't be sneaking under the fence to
> get
> > the job done. As far as I'm concerned, they
> asked
> > for it. They hung a neon sign on G1 that said -
> > dare to find the truth.
>
> Any moral, legal or political implications are
> irrelevant.
> A sample was taken and a sample was analysed by a
> renowned lab.
> Results were obtained from that analyses.
> Even if those who took the sample are demonised
> and criminalised, it has no bearing whatsoever on
> the lab test results.
>
> It's pitiful that the SCA had not already carried
> out its own analyses, and if it already has, it's
> even more pitiful that those results have not yet
> been published.
>
> Is it a question of "two wrongs do not make a
> right" or "two wrongs make a right"?
> In this case knowledge was being denied, those who
> felt they were being denied that knowledge took
> action in order to gain that knowledge.
> It is legally and morally acceptable to repossess
> that which is yours and is being withheld from
> you.
> The physical samples have been returned.
> It's a question of ownership of, access to, and
> denial of knowledge.
> "Entrapment" varies by jurisdiction.
It's a question of how (un)reliable the test results and the source is.
Currently accepted Pyramide dates stand until proven otherwise.
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.
"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.
"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."