Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I would hardly characterize my comment as "hostile"...

Not surprised. You also didn't think you were being hostile when you called me "incredibly stupid" for disagreeing with your opinion in an earlier discussion.


> ...yet can you quote anywhere where
> I have given any "opinion" on the subject?

Well, "And yet Vyse is not afforded the same 'courtesy'" sounds like an opinion. If that's not an opinion, it's certainly not an observation. It's your own personal take which is simply untrue as I made very clear in my subsequent post about me initially being a strong advocate of Vyse.

Your previous post is chock full of opinions, especially when you accused me of "inexhaustible intellectually dishonest behavior ". You continue to be oblivious to your offensive posture when someone disagrees with you.


> > All I said was I was willing to give the Germans
> > and SGS the benefit of the doubt for the time
> > being, pending additional evidence.
>
> Because they tell you want you want to hear.

Thanks for giving us yet another one of your opinions, but you really don't know what I "want to hear".

In my very first post in pt.1 of this discussion, did I not make it clear that I did not fully embrace the Germans' account but rather reserved my opinion until we got further verification from the SGS lab? Did I not question how SGS knew what the commonly known composition of ancient paint was such that they were able to compare the samples to such known composition?


> And you do know the reason these two chuckleheads did
> this was to "prove" Yahweh and the Hebrews built
> the pyramids, right?

I have no interest in the ideology that drives such an investigation. I am only interested in the data. I might strongly disagree with the religious connotations of Pyramidology, but that doesn't make me throw out all of the data reported by Smyth and the Edgar brothers. I also strongly disagree with Mark Lehner's ideological bias in Egyptology, but I still have great respect for his reporting of evidence. Why should I treat the Germans any differently?


> > All of your accusations of me being a liar are
> > empty, based on the written word in these very
> > posts.
>
> I am speaking to your history in general as to why
> you attract such consistent disdain from your
> fellow posters
which is not because you "simply
> disagree" but because of the self absorbed, single
> minded
, intellectually dishonest and incompetent...

And yet every single time I challenge you to cite a specific instance of something I've posted that support any of the allegations you've issued throughout that one paragraph, we get silence at the other end of the line.

The only people expressing their disdain to me are those securely affixed to the orthodox paradigm of trusting the obsolete standards of "authorities", and "historians", and "mainstream opinion", and not actually contemplating the physical evidence that abounds all around us. A prime example is this discussion about Scott and the two Germans. Why hammer those guys rather than focus on the real issue of the SGS analysis. Where is SGS' report? What do they have to say about the sample?

In truth, I fully expect SGS to say something like "Sure, we found this and that in the analysis of the sample, but we cannot vouch for the authenticity of the sample." I would be amazed if SGS actaully claims the paint up in those rafters is the result of a fraud.

And that is what I call objectivity. I find it curious that some of you can't agree with that simple "wait and see" approach to this.


> you...disagree with anything and everything that does not support your beliefs...

That's kind of the definition of "belief".
Are we not allowed to disagree with something if we don't believe it?

Why would you write such things in light of Stower going out of his way to aggressively throw the bomb at Scott by starting the "Creighton persists" discussion in the first place? Stower not only "disagrees" with Scott, he's obviously obsessed with character assassination. Why don't we see you lecturing Stower about any of that nonsense?

Where's the double standard police when you need them?

______________________________________________________________
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 31-May-16 18:41 by Origyptian.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Creighton Persists Part 2 4181 JonnyMcA 19-May-16 14:30
That chemical analysis . . . 719 Martin Stower 19-May-16 17:30
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 636 Origyptian 19-May-16 20:50
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 614 Jon Ellison 19-May-16 21:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 585 Martin Stower 19-May-16 22:01
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 574 Martin Stower 19-May-16 21:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 551 Origyptian 19-May-16 22:12
The unfounded accusations continue..... 670 DScribr 19-May-16 22:46
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 650 Martin Stower 20-May-16 00:14
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 573 Thanos5150 20-May-16 00:35
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 461 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 01:57
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 578 Origyptian 20-May-16 02:47
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 463 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 03:20
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 544 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:10
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 572 DScribr 20-May-16 23:23
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 560 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 23:35
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 544 DScribr 20-May-16 23:40
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 519 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:07
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 419 DScribr 20-May-16 02:58
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 568 Martin Stower 19-May-16 22:55
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 575 DScribr 19-May-16 22:43
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 557 Martin Stower 19-May-16 23:30
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 619 Origyptian 20-May-16 02:48
The lack of analysis . . . 673 DScribr 20-May-16 03:05
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 609 Audrey 20-May-16 04:13
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 532 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 06:58
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 561 DScribr 20-May-16 23:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 692 Origyptian 20-May-16 15:46
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 521 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 516 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 564 Martin Stower 21-May-16 02:07
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 547 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 06:43
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 560 Origyptian 21-May-16 14:58
So much for chemical analysis . . . 548 DScribr 21-May-16 19:54
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 548 Martin Stower 21-May-16 22:49
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 543 Martin Stower 21-May-16 23:00
Re: What's the end game with this? 644 Thunderbird 20-May-16 17:20
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 542 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 529 Audrey 20-May-16 22:43
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 484 Martin Stower 20-May-16 22:54
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 522 Audrey 20-May-16 23:12
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 462 Martin Stower 20-May-16 23:52
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 543 Audrey 21-May-16 00:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 615 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:45
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 457 DScribr 21-May-16 01:35
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 405 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:06
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 489 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 563 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:36
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 743 Martin Stower 21-May-16 02:49
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 603 Martin Stower 20-May-16 18:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 612 Origyptian 20-May-16 20:00
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 520 Thanos5150 20-May-16 20:13
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 553 Origyptian 20-May-16 21:03
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 550 Martin Stower 20-May-16 23:44
Höfer and Görlitz meet Stein 486 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:36
Re: Höfer and Görlitz meet Stein 463 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:23
Re: Höfer and Görlitz meet Stein 681 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:55
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 532 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:34
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 553 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:15
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 483 Origyptian 21-May-16 04:08
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 548 Martin Stower 21-May-16 23:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 642 Origyptian 22-May-16 00:09
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 500 Martin Stower 22-May-16 00:49
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 589 Origyptian 22-May-16 00:57
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 565 Origyptian 22-May-16 01:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 549 Jon Ellison 22-May-16 01:14
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 580 Martin Stower 22-May-16 01:51
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 534 Origyptian 22-May-16 04:21
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 581 Martin Stower 22-May-16 14:20
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 538 Origyptian 22-May-16 17:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 588 Martin Stower 22-May-16 18:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 548 Origyptian 22-May-16 20:34
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 472 Martin Stower 22-May-16 21:30
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 572 Origyptian 22-May-16 23:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 589 Martin Stower 23-May-16 00:03
Re: That chemical analysis is all but forgotten...... 536 DScribr 23-May-16 03:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 571 Richard Fusniak 21-May-16 08:47
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 541 Origyptian 21-May-16 13:26
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 503 Martin Stower 22-May-16 00:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 534 Origyptian 22-May-16 00:50
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 567 Martin Stower 22-May-16 01:39
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 461 Origyptian 22-May-16 04:45
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 478 Martin Stower 22-May-16 16:13
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 464 Martin Stower 21-May-16 22:44
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 669 Origyptian 21-May-16 23:58
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 508 Martin Stower 22-May-16 01:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 755 Martin Stower 20-May-16 22:44
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 517 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:41
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 591 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 596 Origyptian 21-May-16 04:14
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 437 Martin Stower 21-May-16 23:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 577 Thanos5150 19-May-16 22:50
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 557 Martin Stower 19-May-16 23:18
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 464 DScribr 20-May-16 03:07
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 561 Origyptian 20-May-16 02:52
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 503 DScribr 20-May-16 03:12
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 575 Thanos5150 20-May-16 05:20
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 465 Origyptian 20-May-16 13:36
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 582 Thanos5150 20-May-16 17:57
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 578 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 18:56
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 566 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:23
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 636 Thanos5150 20-May-16 19:27
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 496 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 19:29
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 529 Audrey 20-May-16 21:02
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 551 Origyptian 20-May-16 21:12
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 528 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 21:26
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 594 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:08
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 581 Audrey 20-May-16 22:34
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 481 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:36
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 567 Audrey 20-May-16 22:47
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 474 Thanos5150 20-May-16 23:00
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 495 Audrey 20-May-16 23:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 481 Thanos5150 21-May-16 00:01
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 491 Audrey 21-May-16 00:23
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 539 Thanos5150 21-May-16 03:14
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 533 Audrey 21-May-16 05:02
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 469 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 09:10
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 599 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 09:28
The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 615 DScribr 21-May-16 13:37
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 482 Origyptian 21-May-16 13:56
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 526 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 17:48
Willful ignorance continues....... 561 DScribr 21-May-16 19:49
Re: Willful ignorance continues....... 578 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 21:28
Re: Stealing IS a crime! Willful ignorance continues....... 478 DScribr 22-May-16 00:39
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 573 Richard Fusniak 21-May-16 18:17
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 455 DScribr 21-May-16 19:57
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 584 Richard Fusniak 21-May-16 20:24
Stealing IS A Crime!!! 565 DScribr 22-May-16 00:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 557 Origyptian 21-May-16 15:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 476 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 17:53
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 534 Origyptian 21-May-16 21:39
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 534 Jon Ellison 22-May-16 00:46
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 484 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:09
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 566 Audrey 21-May-16 00:26
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 567 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 525 Audrey 21-May-16 01:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 599 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:41
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 553 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 11:00
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 517 DScribr 21-May-16 01:44
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 518 Origyptian 20-May-16 19:25
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 531 Thanos5150 20-May-16 19:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 482 Origyptian 20-May-16 20:35
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 561 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:03
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 479 Origyptian 20-May-16 22:38
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 563 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:52
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 497 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 567 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:05
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 494 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:27
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 518 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 499 Audrey 21-May-16 01:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 596 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:34
Pending statement from Dr. Gorlitz 825 Richard Fusniak 20-May-16 12:04
Re: Pending statement from Dr. Gorlitz 588 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:25
Martin Persists 633 drrayeye 23-May-16 01:30
Re: Martin Persists 611 Martin Stower 23-May-16 12:01
Re: Martin Persists 472 R Avry Wilson 24-May-16 19:58
Mainstream Persists 565 DScribr 25-May-16 00:56
Re: Martin Persists 691 Merrell 28-May-16 09:00
Re: Martin Persists 524 Martin Stower 28-May-16 11:11
as long as we are counting 621 Warwick 25-May-16 16:42
Re: as long as we are counting 580 DScribr 26-May-16 01:53
Re: as long as we are counting 618 cladking 26-May-16 16:57
Re: as long as we are counting 540 Martin Stower 26-May-16 17:31
Re: as long as we are counting 546 Origyptian 26-May-16 17:40
Re: as long as we are counting 465 cladking 27-May-16 00:21
Re: as long as we are counting 554 Warwick 27-May-16 01:27
Re: as long as we are counting 369 Origyptian 27-May-16 02:53
And work hard at obfuscation. 442 DScribr 27-May-16 00:57
Re: And work hard at obfuscation. 507 cladking 27-May-16 02:55
Re: as long as we are counting 477 Warwick 27-May-16 01:29
Re: as long as we are counting 576 cladking 27-May-16 02:59
Re: as long as we are counting 557 Warwick 27-May-16 03:35
Re: as long as we are counting 535 Audrey 27-May-16 04:32
Re: as long as we are counting 490 Warwick 27-May-16 05:34
Re: as long as we are counting 590 cladking 27-May-16 13:35
Re: as long as we are counting 548 Warwick 27-May-16 14:56
The original page on Indiegogo etc. 637 Martin Stower 25-May-16 22:10
Another performance . . . 520 Martin Stower 26-May-16 13:47
Re: Another performance . . . 475 Warwick 26-May-16 13:57
Re: Another performance . . . 415 Origyptian 26-May-16 14:53
Re: Another performance . . . 516 Martin Stower 26-May-16 16:09
Re: Another performance . . . 521 cladking 26-May-16 16:18
Re: Another performance . . . 428 Martin Stower 26-May-16 16:31
Re: Another performance . . . 741 cladking 26-May-16 17:54
Re: Another performance . . . 580 Martin Stower 26-May-16 18:29
Re: Another performance . . . 406 cladking 26-May-16 23:52
Re: Another performance . . . 562 eyeofhorus33 26-May-16 19:00
Re: Another performance . . . 449 cladking 27-May-16 00:05
Re: Another performance . . . 482 Audrey 27-May-16 00:23
Re: Another performance . . . 468 Warwick 27-May-16 01:42
Re: Another performance . . . 553 cladking 27-May-16 02:07
Re: Another performance . . . 498 Warwick 27-May-16 02:15
Re: Another performance . . . 531 cladking 27-May-16 02:48
Re: Another performance . . . 507 Warwick 27-May-16 03:48
Re: Another performance . . . 567 cladking 27-May-16 03:53
Re: Another performance . . . 594 Warwick 27-May-16 05:41
Re: Another performance . . . 495 Audrey 27-May-16 04:51
Re: Another performance . . . 528 Warwick 27-May-16 05:18
NOT Primitive, Low-Tech 484 DScribr 28-May-16 14:09
Re: NOT Primitive, Low-Tech 532 cladking 28-May-16 14:31
Re: Another performance . . . 567 Thanos5150 26-May-16 16:38
Re: Another performance . . . 458 cladking 26-May-16 16:44
Re: Another performance . . . 545 Origyptian 26-May-16 17:33
Re: Another performance . . . 577 cladking 26-May-16 17:40
Re: Another performance . . . 553 Martin Stower 26-May-16 17:49
Re: Another performance . . . 576 cladking 27-May-16 00:15
Re: Another performance . . . 557 Martin Stower 27-May-16 19:17
Re: Another performance . . . 575 Warwick 27-May-16 20:00
Re: Another performance . . . 500 cladking 27-May-16 20:21
Re: Another performance . . . 609 Martin Stower 27-May-16 23:06
Re: Oops....we missed the Basalt flooring and machine disc cuts 412 Thunderbird 27-May-16 23:28
Re: Oops....we missed the Basalt flooring and machine disc cuts 544 Martin Stower 27-May-16 23:41
Re: Another performance . . . 553 cladking 28-May-16 00:33
Re: Another performance . . . 537 Martin Stower 28-May-16 00:59
Re: Another performance . . . 532 cladking 28-May-16 02:36
Re: Another performance . . . 519 Martin Stower 28-May-16 23:55
Re: Another performance . . . 441 cladking 29-May-16 01:23
Re: Another performance . . . 490 Martin Stower 29-May-16 19:35
Re: Another performance . . . 657 cladking 29-May-16 20:43
Re: Another performance . . . 546 R Avry Wilson 28-May-16 02:39
Re: Another performance . . . 573 cladking 28-May-16 03:41
Re: Another performance . . . 516 Thanos5150 28-May-16 06:20
Re: Another performance . . . 581 cladking 28-May-16 13:40
Re: Another performance . . . 555 Origyptian 28-May-16 15:04
Re: Another performance . . . 535 Jon Ellison 28-May-16 16:38
Re: Another performance . . . 407 cladking 28-May-16 17:52
Re: Another performance . . . 498 Jon Ellison 28-May-16 17:58
Re: Another performance . . . 430 Origyptian 29-May-16 02:51
Re: Another performance . . . 449 cladking 29-May-16 03:08
Re: Another performance . . . 511 Origyptian 29-May-16 04:03
Re: Another performance . . . 528 Thanos5150 29-May-16 05:03
Re: Another performance . . . 555 Origyptian 29-May-16 13:18
Re: Another performance . . . 575 Thanos5150 29-May-16 15:03
Focus on the axiom 513 Origyptian 29-May-16 15:27
Re: Focus on everything BUT the facts 596 DScribr 29-May-16 15:41
Re: Focus on everything BUT the facts 475 cladking 29-May-16 17:29
Re: Focus on the axiom 453 Thanos5150 30-May-16 01:49
Re: Focus on the axiom 524 Origyptian 30-May-16 05:32
Re: Focus on the axiom 512 Thanos5150 31-May-16 02:35
Re: Focus on the axiom 539 Origyptian 31-May-16 06:41
Re: Focus on the axiom 544 Thanos5150 01-Jun-16 00:28
Re: Focus on reality. 501 DScribr 01-Jun-16 00:51
Re: Focus on the axiom 486 Origyptian 01-Jun-16 06:20
Re: Focus on the axiom 532 Thanos5150 02-Jun-16 03:08
Re: Focus on the axiom 509 cladking 02-Jun-16 04:00
Re: Focus on the axiom 453 Origyptian 02-Jun-16 04:25
Re: Focus on the axiom 462 Thanos5150 02-Jun-16 16:34
Re: Focus on the axiom 475 cladking 02-Jun-16 18:20
Re: Focus on the axiom 528 Origyptian 03-Jun-16 18:04
Re: Focus on the axiom 524 R Avry Wilson 03-Jun-16 18:43
Re: Focus on the axiom 508 Origyptian 03-Jun-16 21:24
Re: Focus on the axiom 506 Corpuscles 03-Jun-16 23:59
Re: Focus on the axiom 354 Origyptian 04-Jun-16 06:29
Re: Focus on the axiom 432 R Avry Wilson 04-Jun-16 00:12
Re: Focus on the axiom 422 Origyptian 04-Jun-16 07:02
Re: Focus on the axiom 545 Jon Ellison 04-Jun-16 10:18
Re: Focus on the axiom 487 R Avry Wilson 05-Jun-16 04:15
Re: Focus on the axiom 494 Martin Stower 03-Jun-16 22:28
Re: Focus on the axiom 492 cladking 03-Jun-16 22:51
Re: Focus on the axiom 618 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 01:08
Re: Focus on the axiom 505 Origyptian 05-Jun-16 01:25
Re: Focus on the axiom 545 Thanos5150 05-Jun-16 04:15
Re: Focus on the axiom 507 Origyptian 05-Jun-16 17:29
Re: Focus on the axiom 539 Martin Stower 05-Jun-16 19:35
Re: Focus on the axiom 554 Origyptian 05-Jun-16 22:48
Re: Focus on the axiom 467 Martin Stower 05-Jun-16 23:47
Re: Focus on the axiom 514 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 00:54
Re: Focus on the axiom 479 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 01:01
Re: Focus on the axiom 518 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 01:05
Re: Focus on the axiom 503 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 02:40
Re: Focus on the axiom 521 R Avry Wilson 06-Jun-16 03:39
Re: Focus on the axiom 443 Audrey 06-Jun-16 04:59
Re: Focus on the axiom 431 Jon Ellison 06-Jun-16 07:59
Re: Focus on the axiom 455 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 14:00
Re: Focus on the axiom 502 cladking 06-Jun-16 16:13
Re: Focus on the axiom 461 Corpuscles 07-Jun-16 00:20
Re: Focus on the axiom 506 Origyptian 07-Jun-16 02:55
Re: Focus on the axiom 448 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 15:33
Re: Focus on the axiom 396 Warwick 06-Jun-16 16:17
Re: Focus on the axiom 528 Audrey 06-Jun-16 16:39
Re: Focus on the axiom 522 Warwick 06-Jun-16 16:58
Re: Focus on the axiom 421 Audrey 06-Jun-16 17:46
Re: Focus on the axiom 463 Warwick 06-Jun-16 18:13
Re: Focus on the axiom 400 Audrey 06-Jun-16 23:44
Read what I wrote 419 Warwick 07-Jun-16 17:15
Re: Read what I wrote 445 Audrey 08-Jun-16 00:22
Re: Read what I wrote 436 Martin Stower 08-Jun-16 01:40
Re: Read what I wrote 602 Audrey 08-Jun-16 01:52
Re: Read what I wrote 466 Martin Stower 08-Jun-16 13:47
Vyse's veracity.... 458 Warwick 09-Jun-16 16:29
Re: Vyse's veracity.... 380 Audrey 09-Jun-16 16:51
Re: Vyse's veracity.... 489 Warwick 09-Jun-16 17:19
Re: Vyse's veracity.... 518 Audrey 09-Jun-16 17:45
Wilkinson's opinions 444 Warwick 09-Jun-16 18:47
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 460 Origyptian 09-Jun-16 20:57
Ori's opinions 607 DScribr 10-Jun-16 01:45
Re: The incredible Teflon Red Ochre 433 Thunderbird 10-Jun-16 04:07
Re: The incredible Teflon Red Ochre 558 Martin Stower 10-Jun-16 14:49
Re: The incredible Red Ochre lasted 4500 yrs. 478 DScribr 11-Jun-16 00:40
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 405 Martin Stower 10-Jun-16 02:28
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 396 Audrey 10-Jun-16 03:05
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 532 Martin Stower 10-Jun-16 14:09
Bibliography 471 Warwick 10-Jun-16 18:07
Re: Bibliography 485 Origyptian 10-Jun-16 18:35
Re: Bibliography 462 Warwick 10-Jun-16 20:01
Re: Bibliography 514 Origyptian 10-Jun-16 21:54
Re: Bibliography 535 Corpuscles 10-Jun-16 23:45
Re: Bibliography 349 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 17:01
Re: Bibliography 484 Corpuscles 11-Jun-16 22:36
Re: Bibliography 440 Audrey 11-Jun-16 23:08
Re: Bibliography 467 Corpuscles 11-Jun-16 23:26
Re: Bibliography 376 Audrey 12-Jun-16 02:30
Re: Bibliography 420 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 03:19
Re: Bibliography 368 Audrey 12-Jun-16 03:32
Re: Bibliography 407 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 03:40
Re: Bibliography 418 Audrey 12-Jun-16 03:50
Re: Bibliography 373 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 04:30
Re: Bibliography 369 Audrey 12-Jun-16 04:47
Re: Bibliography 349 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 05:02
Re: Bibliography 490 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 10:49
Re: Bibliography 446 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 15:56
Re: Bibliography 371 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 17:41
But Avry.. 420 Warwick 12-Jun-16 17:58
Re: But Avry.. 499 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 18:14
Re: But Avry.. 483 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:37
Re: But Avry.. 464 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 20:15
Re: But Avry.. 469 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:44
Re: But Avry.. 439 Warwick 12-Jun-16 18:59
Re: But Avry.. 418 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 20:11
This whole discussion is a boondoggle 496 DScribr 13-Jun-16 01:04
Re: This whole discussion is a boondoggle 478 Warwick 13-Jun-16 16:24
Re: Bibliography 345 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 10:28
Re: Bibliography 440 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 23:35
Re: Bibliography 466 Corpuscles 11-Jun-16 23:58
Re: Bibliography 439 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 00:48
Re: Bibliography 477 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 01:13
Re: Bibliography 507 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 01:33
Re: Bibliography 526 Martin Stower 11-Jun-16 02:05
Re: Bibliography 496 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 18:09
Re: Bibliography 485 Martin Stower 11-Jun-16 19:22
Re: Bibliography 423 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 19:56
Re: Bibliography 351 Martin Stower 11-Jun-16 20:47
Re: Bibliography 477 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:03
Re: Bibliography 463 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 00:22
Re: Bibliography 357 Audrey 12-Jun-16 01:58
Re: Bibliography 496 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 02:24
Re: Bibliography 411 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 12:23
Re: Bibliography 437 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 14:50
Re: Bibliography 450 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 16:46
Re: Bibliography 368 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:10
Re: Bibliography 464 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:18
Re: Bibliography 455 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 00:35
Re: Bibliography 516 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:39
Re: Bibliography 413 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 01:23
Re: Bibliography 412 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 02:18
Re: Bibliography 360 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 13:55
Re: Bibliography 433 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 15:45
Re: Bibliography 463 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 17:32
Re: Bibliography 411 Warwick 12-Jun-16 17:41
Re: Bibliography 457 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 18:08
Re: Bibliography 450 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:48
Re: Bibliography 450 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:35
Re: Bibliography 398 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 19:09
Gonna ignore the noise and try again 446 Warwick 12-Jun-16 19:53
Re: Gonna ignore the noise and try again 459 Thunderbird 12-Jun-16 20:18
Re: Gonna ignore the noise and try again 420 Audrey 12-Jun-16 21:04