Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > DScribr Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > It's highly unlikely the paint samples stolen
> > by
> > > Görlitz and Erdmann would be, (would've
> been)
> > > represented in a legitimate and respectable
> > manner
> > > anyway. We still have only their word to back
> > what
> > > they have/will claim.
> > >
> > > So much for 'physical evidence'.
> > >
> > > (And the fringe still needs the Radio-Carbon
> > Test,
> > > as the AE's red ochre paint was still
> made/used
> > in
> > > Vyse's day.)
> >
> > Femano has failed all along to understand just
> how
> > far “physical evidence” (so-called) depends
> on
> > testimony. It needs chain of custody and
> Görlitz
> > and Erdmann have no credibility on that.
> Taking
> > the sample in the first place was a criminal
> act,
> > Görlitz did not follow the correct sampling
> > protocols and their statements about what they
> did
> > are wildly contradictory: they sampled the
> > cartouche/they did not sample the cartouche; it
> > was not iron oxide (red ochre)/it was red ochre
> > (iron oxide). Credibility zero.
>
> Witness orthodoxy in its final throes.
>
> When did Görlitz say he sampled the Khufu
> cartouche? How could he have sampled the Khufu
> cartouche when those same scratches have been
> there for years before he was ever up there?
>
> It's hilarious that you focus on everything but
> the simple issue of whether SGS has any official
> statement to make on the matter. Until they do,
> the rest of your argument is irrelevant. As I
> said, I withhold judgement against Görlitz for
> the time being.



And its pathetic how you fail to focus on the existence of the known facts, (I suggest you reread MS' post).

Gorlitz and accomplice = Credibility zero....their test results worth nil.




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 20-May-16 03:06 by DScribr.