Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > DScribr Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > It's highly unlikely the paint samples stolen
> > by
> > > Görlitz and Erdmann would be, (would've
> been)
> > > represented in a legitimate and respectable
> > manner
> > > anyway. We still have only their word to back
> > what
> > > they have/will claim.
> > >
> > > So much for 'physical evidence'.
> > >
> > > (And the fringe still needs the Radio-Carbon
> > Test,
> > > as the AE's red ochre paint was still
> made/used
> > in
> > > Vyse's day.)
> >
> > Femano has failed all along to understand just
> how
> > far “physical evidence” (so-called) depends
> on
> > testimony. It needs chain of custody and
> Görlitz
> > and Erdmann have no credibility on that.
> Taking
> > the sample in the first place was a criminal
> act,
> > Görlitz did not follow the correct sampling
> > protocols and their statements about what they
> did
> > are wildly contradictory: they sampled the
> > cartouche/they did not sample the cartouche; it
> > was not iron oxide (red ochre)/it was red ochre
> > (iron oxide). Credibility zero.
>
> Witness orthodoxy in its final throes.
>
> When did Görlitz say he sampled the Khufu
> cartouche? How could he have sampled the Khufu
> cartouche when those same scratches have been
> there for years before he was ever up there?
>
> It's hilarious that you focus on everything but
> the simple issue of whether SGS has any official
> statement to make on the matter. Until they do,
> the rest of your argument is irrelevant. As I
> said, I withhold judgement against Görlitz for
> the time being.
And its pathetic how you fail to focus on the existence of the known facts, (I suggest you reread MS' post).
Gorlitz and accomplice = Credibility zero....their test results worth nil.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 20-May-16 03:06 by DScribr.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > DScribr Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > It's highly unlikely the paint samples stolen
> > by
> > > Görlitz and Erdmann would be, (would've
> been)
> > > represented in a legitimate and respectable
> > manner
> > > anyway. We still have only their word to back
> > what
> > > they have/will claim.
> > >
> > > So much for 'physical evidence'.
> > >
> > > (And the fringe still needs the Radio-Carbon
> > Test,
> > > as the AE's red ochre paint was still
> made/used
> > in
> > > Vyse's day.)
> >
> > Femano has failed all along to understand just
> how
> > far “physical evidence” (so-called) depends
> on
> > testimony. It needs chain of custody and
> Görlitz
> > and Erdmann have no credibility on that.
> Taking
> > the sample in the first place was a criminal
> act,
> > Görlitz did not follow the correct sampling
> > protocols and their statements about what they
> did
> > are wildly contradictory: they sampled the
> > cartouche/they did not sample the cartouche; it
> > was not iron oxide (red ochre)/it was red ochre
> > (iron oxide). Credibility zero.
>
> Witness orthodoxy in its final throes.
>
> When did Görlitz say he sampled the Khufu
> cartouche? How could he have sampled the Khufu
> cartouche when those same scratches have been
> there for years before he was ever up there?
>
> It's hilarious that you focus on everything but
> the simple issue of whether SGS has any official
> statement to make on the matter. Until they do,
> the rest of your argument is irrelevant. As I
> said, I withhold judgement against Görlitz for
> the time being.
And its pathetic how you fail to focus on the existence of the known facts, (I suggest you reread MS' post).
Gorlitz and accomplice = Credibility zero....their test results worth nil.
Currently accepted Pyramide dates stand until proven otherwise.
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.
"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.
"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 20-May-16 03:06 by DScribr.