Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And following, we have this: “Die
> Detail-Analysen stehen jedoch noch aus, . . .”
>
> And his partner-in-crime has gone noticeably quiet
> on a point clearly relevant to what he has to
> say:
>
> [url=http://info.kopp-verlag.de/neue-weltbilder/ve
> rbotene-archaeologie/stefan-erdmann/endlich-bewies
> en-cheops-war-nicht-der-bauherr-der-grossen-pyrami
> de-von-gizeh.html]http://info.kopp-verlag.de/neue-
> weltbilder/verbotene-archaeologie/stefan-erdmann/e
> ndlich-bewiesen-cheops-war-nicht-der-bauherr-der-g
> rossen-pyramide-von-gizeh.html[/url]
>
> Yes, Femano, I can quite see that you’d give
> “the benefit of the doubt” to a bumbling
> criminal liar who shares your ideology.
>
> Görlitz and Erdmann first of all claimed to have
> sampled the cartouche and then, when something hit
> the fan, furiously denied having done so. One way
> or another, they lied.
>
> Görlitz (as seen on video) failed to follow
> elementary sampling protocols.
>
> Such as these you’re prepared to trust, [i]when
> it suits you[/i].
>
> Not so strange, then, that no such “benefit of
> the doubt” is extended to Richard Howard Vyse.
> Here you align yourself with the moral
> charlatanism of Scott Creighton and condemn him
> utterly for the far less egregious and relevant
> offence of behaving very much like other
> parliamentary candidates in the early decades of
> the 19th century.
>
> M.

It's highly unlikely the paint samples stolen by Görlitz and Erdmann would be, (would've been) represented in a legitimate and respectable manner anyway. We still have only their word to back what they have/will claim.


So much for 'physical evidence'.



(And the fringe still needs the Radio-Carbon Test, as the AE's red ochre paint was still made/used in Vyse's day.)



Regards, W