And his partner-in-crime has gone noticeably quiet on a point clearly relevant to what he has to say:
Yes, Femano, I can quite see that you’d give “the benefit of the doubt” to a bumbling criminal liar who shares your ideology.
Görlitz and Erdmann first of all claimed to have sampled the cartouche and then, when something hit the fan, furiously denied having done so. One way or another, they lied.
Görlitz (as seen on video) failed to follow elementary sampling protocols.
Such as these you’re prepared to trust, when it suits you.
Not so strange, then, that no such “benefit of the doubt” is extended to Richard Howard Vyse. Here you align yourself with the moral charlatanism of Scott Creighton and condemn him utterly for the far less egregious and relevant offence of behaving very much like other parliamentary candidates in the early decades of the 19th century.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 19-May-16 22:13 by Martin Stower.