Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Harte Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Given that the Egyptians didn't use inches or
> feet, can you do this with the royal cubit (which,
> BTW, is 20.6102, not 20.619 inches)?
>
> Harte

Well what you should have said, there is no evidence to date to show that they had a cubit that correlates to the inch.

My hypothesis is is that an outside source could have used their cubit of the day in the designing process that when converted back into the sources standard which was equivalent to our modern day inch would reveal all the encoded information.

So to be clear, the Egyptian cubit of their day may have been used in construction , but the designer made sure it could be read and decoded back into a future unit that was the same as the designers unit, doing so would allow the designer to send his knowledge into the future, but then of course the question is, how did he know our present time period would be working with a unit of measure the same as his , my time traveling friend !!.

There are many different cubit lengths that have been discovered , mainly based on body parts, so if you believe the most complicated and precise structure to be built for thousands of years was based on someones arm length then your wellcome to that world, does every one have the exact same length of arm, was it a male, or a females arm, were they young or old when they took the measure,

Check this site out and that highlights at least 16 different cubits and rods, so your 20.6102 is correct and so is my 20.619 , but they are one of many.

[www.egyptorigins.org]

Using one of the many cubits available one could have encoded the numbers that i have found.

For example take my suggested figure for G1's perimeter at some 36278" and its mean base side of 9069.5 inches.

Ok so taking one of those 16 possible cubits that are known of, then if one could be found to be 20.6125 then that would fit very nicely and exact into that mean figure , and would go along with the accepted thinking that 440 cubits was the plan for one of the base sides.

As 440 x cubits of 20.6125" = 9069.5"

Then its also pointed out the the height was based on 280 cubits, but not by 20.6125 but by another one of 20.62" rounded.

As my 5773.6" / 280 = 20.62" exactly

Various other cubits are available at all other ancient sites.

DPP

Subject Views Written By Posted
The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 1652 DUNE 16-May-16 14:00
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 427 Harte 18-May-16 09:22
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 417 DUNE 18-May-16 10:33
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 393 Harte 19-May-16 09:33
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 545 DUNE 19-May-16 11:06
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 484 Sirfiroth 19-May-16 16:29
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 556 Harte 19-May-16 21:29
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 357 drew 24-May-16 06:09
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 384 DUNE 24-May-16 09:04
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 411 DUNE 24-May-16 14:47
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 384 DUNE 25-May-16 17:06
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 355 Harte 25-May-16 21:59
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 418 DUNE 26-May-16 12:42
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 426 drew 27-May-16 06:03
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 482 DUNE 27-May-16 09:44
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 353 drew 30-May-16 02:15
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 303 Sirfiroth 28-May-16 18:45
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 343 DUNE 29-May-16 07:42
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 401 Sirfiroth 29-May-16 17:39
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 236 drew 30-May-16 02:05
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 378 DUNE 30-May-16 07:53
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 447 drew 01-Jun-16 06:10
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 516 gjb 29-May-16 07:00
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 449 DUNE 29-May-16 11:15
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 400 Jon Ellison 29-May-16 18:42
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 371 DUNE 29-May-16 20:19
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 431 Jon Ellison 29-May-16 22:34
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 276 DUNE 30-May-16 07:40
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 348 Jon Ellison 30-May-16 08:24
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 478 gjb 29-May-16 21:43
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 371 DUNE 30-May-16 06:41
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 367 Sirfiroth 30-May-16 20:13
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 347 DUNE 31-May-16 14:33
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 339 Sirfiroth 31-May-16 15:10
Re: The Square Root of three at 1.7321 that Giza has encoded in its Plan 355 DUNE 31-May-16 17:13

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.