Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >... SNIP
> > I treat everyone respectfully
> > who agree and who respectfully disagree with
> me.
> >
> > But start with the thuggish sarcasm, name
> calling,
> > character assassination, etc. and the gloves
> come
> > off.
>
> Now STOP, LOOK at page 12, and THINK!
>
> Page 12
>
>
Quote
Direct quote - Origyptian
> Author: Origyptian ()
>
> Date: May 11, 2016 07:58PM
>
> Thanos5150 Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------
> ------
> >
> > So the mystery is not "if" the AE made stone
> > vessels, which is incredibly stupid to say
> otherwise...
>
> YOU SAID!
>
> See, it's exactly that kind of myopic pompous
> arrogance
that makes you so difficult to
> converse with.
>
>
>
>
> You started the drama with Thanos!
>
> UNDENIABLE FACT!
>
> The original post from Thanos was to me and it
> means.... it would be incredibly stupid to suggest
> that AE did not make any stone vessels!
>
>
> THINK hard!
>
> Cheers

Let's not stop there. Jon's direct response to what I said was:
Quote

I don't think is incredibly stupid at all, There is no evidence in the archaeological record of the tools, means or methods that could have remotely, possibly produced the one piece narrow necked vessels.

He is not offended and understands I am talking about the idea and not any person or group.

Now lets look at Audrey's first response:
Thanos says:
Quote

So the mystery is not "if" the AE made stone vessels, which is incredibly stupid to say otherwise, it is why does this quality appear suddenly in Archaic Dynastic times (Dynasty 00/0), hand in hand with monumental noble tombs and boat
> burials among other curiosities, so fully developed and of a quality that is unsurpassed in later times (no, this is not an invitation to make a vapid comment about an antediluvian lost civilization). Most telling, to me anyways, is that this also all begins with the appearance of this: And it is here that Dynastic Egypt begins.

Audrey's reply:
Quote

It is "here" that the homesteaders planted their butts and began to graffiti everything in sight.

She is not offended and understands I am talking about the idea and not any person or group.

No outcry or indignation that I am supposedly calling people "stupid" that followed in nearly each of her responses only after Origyptian's post which he first says this:
Quote

See, it's exactly that kind of myopic pompous arrogance that makes you so difficult to converse with....

So what is it about these scenes are seem so "obvious" to you to the point of calling anyone disagreeing with you, "incredibly stupid"?....

It's "incredibly stupid" to deny that provenance, eh? Nothing incredibly stupid about having blind faith acceptance of such attribution without any rationale other than attempted intimidation thrown at anyone who disagrees due to the lack of any tools and methods that could accomplish such precision stonework? You truly think yours is such an extremely credible position?....

What unbelievably "obvious" tools and methods that were used to make these things, Thanos, that would justify you calling anyone who expresses skepticism so "incredibly stupid"?....

Oh, that's "interesting" to you, is it? You means you're not being "incredibly stupid" for not understanding why all the stuff that orthodoxy claims to have been made with the oldest technology happens to be the best stuff?....

It's all so obvious...except for some "interesting" stuff that you can't explain and yet feel no compulsion to consider in your paradigm since it just might stir up that neat little self-consistent house of cards.

"Incredibly stupid" indeed.

Yeesh. And that is but the parts which include the words "incredibly stupid". Which despite being corrected Origyptian repeats several more times in all of his subsequent posts to the effect: "You're the one calling people "incredibly stupid"."

Now let's look at Audrey's following responses:

Quote

BS. You called me stupid, it's insulting, pisses me off and who the hell do you think you are anyways.
Speak for yourself! You don't know what every poster is thinking. The audacity to say so do is.......

Yes you did call people stupid, in plural....

Or would that be a "stupid" "dishonest" "vapid" "lie"....

Unless you're suggesting that I believe it because Egyptology says so? That would be stupid.

I'll never learn that you know it all (like you're showing us an obvious truth and how stupid that I don't see it). I don't like your tone....

And probably nothing more than that. If that's good enough for you, fine, far be it for me to call you stupid for being so accepting of what I reject....

Vapid, stupid, dishonest, lie, were words you used for others.

The rest of her posts are simply trollish bile directed at me personally if anyone even cares to follow along.

And now John is confused all of a sudden as well (though to his credit, however small, halfheartedly):

Quote

Is your implication of stupidity a term of endearment?...

Though he backtracks acknowledging again it was said about an idea:
Quote

Frankly I don't see anything stupid about any one of them [ideas he presents].

But unfortunately the confusion begins again:
Quote

In that case whom were you referring to as "stupid"?

And they are the ones who complain people attack them just for disagreeing with them? Pfft. Nonsense.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Creighton persists 3966 Martin Stower 30-Apr-16 23:26
Some may also be wondering . . . 715 Martin Stower 30-Apr-16 23:37
Re: Creighton persists 867 Frank D 30-Apr-16 23:41
On a natural reading . . . 871 Martin Stower 01-May-16 00:44
Re: On a natural reading . . . 636 Hanslune 01-May-16 05:25
Re: On a natural reading . . . 727 Martin Stower 01-May-16 13:53
Re: On a natural reading . . . 638 Hanslune 01-May-16 14:42
And who will guard the Guards? 645 LonelyAngel 09-May-16 09:08
Re: And who will guard the Guards? 865 Origyptian 09-May-16 12:47
Re: And who will guard the Guards? 665 DScribr 09-May-16 13:21
Re: And who will guard the Guards? 780 LonelyAngel 09-May-16 13:48
Re: And who will read his book? 597 DScribr 10-May-16 02:05
Re: And who will guard the Guards? 630 Martin Stower 16-May-16 23:01
Re: And who will guard the Guards? 675 Martin Stower 09-May-16 19:00
Re: And who will guard the Guards? 713 Corpuscles 09-May-16 20:07
Re: And who will accept the facts? 634 DScribr 10-May-16 02:21
Re: And who will accept the facts? 615 Corpuscles 10-May-16 03:01
Re: And who will accept the facts? 565 DScribr 10-May-16 03:30
Re: And who will accept the facts? 582 Corpuscles 10-May-16 03:47
Re: And who will accept the facts? 504 DScribr 10-May-16 13:32
Re: And who will accept the facts? 476 Harte 10-May-16 20:53
Re: And who will accept the facts? 593 Origyptian 10-May-16 21:14
Change Of Tune!?! 732 DScribr 11-May-16 01:54
The certainty of contamination 606 DScribr 11-May-16 01:44
Re: And who will accept the facts? 589 Frank D 11-May-16 23:40
Re: And who will accept the facts? 553 DScribr 12-May-16 02:52
Re: And who will guard the Henhouse??? 586 DScribr 10-May-16 02:11
Re: And who will guard the Henhouse??? 701 LonelyAngel 10-May-16 12:40
Re: And who will guard the Henhouse??? 576 Origyptian 10-May-16 13:16
Re: And who will guard the Henhouse??? 654 DScribr 10-May-16 13:35
Re: On reading about 'proof' 541 DScribr 07-May-16 15:56
Re: On reading about 'proof' 592 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 16:39
Re: Creighton persists 947 drrayeye 01-May-16 15:10
Re: Creighton persists 723 Martin Stower 01-May-16 16:21
Re: Attack!....Attack! 634 Thunderbird 01-May-16 22:47
Re: Attack!....Attack! 725 Martin Stower 01-May-16 23:19
Re: Attack!....Attack! 701 Hanslune 02-May-16 01:26
Re: Attack!....Attack! 719 Martin Stower 02-May-16 20:25
Re: Attack!....Attack! 716 Hanslune 02-May-16 21:12
Re: Creighton persists 770 cladking 02-May-16 00:22
Re: Creighton persists 695 Martin Stower 02-May-16 01:11
Re: Creighton persists 623 cladking 02-May-16 01:31
Re: Creighton persists 667 Martin Stower 02-May-16 20:03
Re: Creighton persists 641 cladking 03-May-16 00:50
Re: Creighton persists 619 Hanslune 03-May-16 06:00
Re: Creighton persists 586 Merrell 03-May-16 07:34
Re: Creighton persists 821 Origyptian 03-May-16 11:46
Re: Creighton persists 729 Martin Stower 03-May-16 14:01
Re: Creighton persists 826 Origyptian 03-May-16 21:55
Re: Creighton persists 703 Martin Stower 03-May-16 22:54
Re: Creighton persists 705 Origyptian 04-May-16 03:49
Re: Creighton persists 715 Thanos5150 03-May-16 18:26
Re: Creighton persists 702 Origyptian 03-May-16 21:09
Re: Creighton persists 775 Martin Stower 03-May-16 22:56
Re: Creighton persists 672 Origyptian 04-May-16 03:52
Re: Creighton persists 633 Martin Stower 04-May-16 17:54
Re: Creighton persists 621 Origyptian 04-May-16 21:06
Re: Creighton persists 979 Martin Stower 04-May-16 22:28
Re: Creighton persists 647 Harte 06-May-16 10:17
Re: Creighton persists 607 Origyptian 06-May-16 13:04
Re: Creighton persists 560 Martin Stower 06-May-16 15:35
Re: Creighton persists 622 Harte 06-May-16 16:50
Re: Creighton persists 606 Jon Ellison 06-May-16 17:33
Re: Creighton persists 542 Audrey 06-May-16 20:00
Re: Creighton persists 909 Jon Ellison 06-May-16 20:25
Re: Creighton persists 622 Jon Ellison 06-May-16 20:48
Re: Creighton persists 666 Archae Solenhofen 06-May-16 22:30
Re: Creighton persists 566 Jon Ellison 06-May-16 23:37
Re: Creighton persists 600 Martin Stower 07-May-16 00:02
Re: Creighton persists 597 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 00:33
Re: Creighton persists 726 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 01:07
Re: Creighton persists 610 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 01:55
Re: Creighton persists 468 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 02:03
Re: Creighton persists 810 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 05:06
Re: Creighton persists 501 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 10:39
Re: Creighton persists 541 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 16:38
Re: Creighton persists 575 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 17:03
Some "Engineer" 953 DScribr 08-May-16 20:54
Re: Some "Engineer" 570 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 21:00
Re: Some "Engineer" 663 Audrey 08-May-16 21:15
Re: Some "Engineer" 658 DScribr 08-May-16 21:33
Re: Some "Engineer" 627 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 21:44
Re: Creighton persists 671 Audrey 07-May-16 02:09
Re: Creighton persists 582 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 02:16
Re: Creighton persists 599 Luminescence 08-May-16 01:52
Another "Impossibility" 597 DScribr 08-May-16 21:36
Re: Creighton persists 598 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 02:23
Re: Creighton persists 728 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 05:16
my mysterious balls 667 Audrey 07-May-16 06:42
Re: Creighton persists 533 Origyptian 07-May-16 15:51
Re: Creighton persists 552 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 17:12
Re: Creighton persists 486 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 17:23
Re: Creighton persists 611 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 17:53
Re: Creighton persists 545 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 18:40
Re: Creighton persists 576 Audrey 07-May-16 19:30
Re: Creighton persists 543 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 20:11
Re: Creighton persists 563 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 00:06
Re: Creighton persists 613 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 01:23
Re: Creighton persists 545 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 09:48
Re: Creighton persists 484 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 11:34
Re: Creighton persists 524 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 17:32
Re: Creighton persists 526 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 20:07
Re: Creighton persists 625 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 20:24
Re: Creighton persists 511 Origyptian 09-May-16 02:37
Re: Creighton persists 464 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 10:32
Re: Creighton persists 565 Origyptian 09-May-16 12:58
Re: Creighton persists 613 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 13:25
Re: Creighton persists 498 Origyptian 09-May-16 13:30
Re: Creighton persists 527 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 13:33
Re: Creighton persists 523 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 20:44
Re: Creighton persists 586 Origyptian 08-May-16 15:31
Re: Creighton persists 468 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 16:17
Failure to acept the facts persists 558 DScribr 08-May-16 22:11
Re: Failure to acept the facts persists 637 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 22:26
Re: Failure to acept the facts persists 575 DScribr 09-May-16 00:29
Re: Creighton persists 537 Audrey 08-May-16 17:37
Re: Creighton persists 613 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 18:30
Re: Creighton persists 570 Audrey 08-May-16 18:52
Re: Creighton persists 641 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 20:13
Re: Creighton persists 558 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 20:20
Re: Creighton persists 569 Audrey 08-May-16 20:35
Re: Creighton persists 592 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 22:05
Re: Creighton persists 534 Audrey 08-May-16 23:05
Re: Creighton persists 533 Archae Solenhofen 09-May-16 00:11
Re: Creighton persists 613 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 00:35
Re: Creighton persists 499 Corpuscles 09-May-16 01:28
Re: Creighton persists 603 Origyptian 09-May-16 17:15
Re: Creighton persists 549 Corpuscles 09-May-16 19:40
Re: Creighton persists 504 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 20:02
Re: Creighton persists 562 Origyptian 09-May-16 21:25
Re: Creighton persists 650 Martin Stower 09-May-16 22:16
Re: Creighton persists 591 Origyptian 09-May-16 23:06
Re: Creighton persists 605 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 23:33
Re: Creighton persists 557 Martin Stower 09-May-16 23:41
Re: Creighton persists 602 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 23:45
Re: Creighton persists 626 Martin Stower 09-May-16 23:58
Re: Creighton persists 527 Jon Ellison 10-May-16 01:05
Re: Creighton persists 561 Martin Stower 10-May-16 19:32
Re: Creighton persists 614 Origyptian 10-May-16 20:31
Re: Creighton persists 580 Martin Stower 10-May-16 20:45
What Standards? 482 DScribr 10-May-16 02:37
Re: Creighton persists 491 Jon Ellison 10-May-16 14:45
Re: Creighton persists 514 Origyptian 10-May-16 14:53
Re: Creighton persists 585 Jon Ellison 10-May-16 15:00
Re: Creighton persists 601 Audrey 11-May-16 00:53
Re: Creighton persists 643 Martin Stower 11-May-16 01:43
Also . . . 572 Martin Stower 11-May-16 09:19
Re: Creighton persists 624 Origyptian 11-May-16 03:14
Re: Creighton persists 793 Martin Stower 11-May-16 10:17
Re: Creighton persists 675 Corpuscles 11-May-16 10:53
Re: Vessel manufacture 756 Thanos5150 11-May-16 17:24
Re: Vessel manufacture 498 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 18:11
Re: Vessel manufacture 753 Thanos5150 11-May-16 19:30
Re: Vessel manufacture 506 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:02
Re: Vessel manufacture 465 Thanos5150 11-May-16 20:26
Re: Vessel manufacture 519 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 20:36
Re: Vessel manufacture 566 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:58
Re: Vessel manufacture 501 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 21:07
Re: Vessel manufacture 498 Thanos5150 11-May-16 21:18
Re: Vessel manufacture 540 Origyptian 11-May-16 21:35
Re: Vessel manufacture 510 Thanos5150 11-May-16 21:49
Re: Vessel manufacture 439 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 21:58
Re: Vessel manufacture 497 Thanos5150 11-May-16 22:02
Re: Vessel manufacture 571 Origyptian 11-May-16 22:25
Re: Vessel manufacture 456 Origyptian 11-May-16 22:19
Re: Vessel manufacture 484 Origyptian 11-May-16 22:03
Re: Vessel manufacture 603 Thanos5150 11-May-16 22:15
Re: Vessel manufacture 520 Origyptian 11-May-16 22:26
Re: Vessel manufacture 507 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 21:41
Re: Vessel manufacture 472 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:41
Re: Vessel manufacture 475 Thanos5150 11-May-16 20:55
Re: Vessel manufacture 489 Origyptian 11-May-16 21:07
Re: Vessel manufacture 433 Audrey 11-May-16 21:12
Re: Vessel manufacture 483 Thanos5150 11-May-16 21:20
Re: Vessel manufacture 530 Origyptian 11-May-16 21:44
Re: Vessel manufacture 501 Thanos5150 11-May-16 21:58
Re: Vessel manufacture 530 Origyptian 11-May-16 22:23
Re: Vessel manufacture 515 Thanos5150 11-May-16 22:41
Re: Vessel manufacture 606 Audrey 11-May-16 21:56
Re: Vessel manufacture 465 Thanos5150 11-May-16 22:08
Re: Vessel manufacture 452 Thanos5150 11-May-16 21:35
Re: Vessel manufacture 468 Audrey 11-May-16 22:40
Re: Vessel manufacture 459 Thanos5150 11-May-16 22:44
Re: Vessel manufacture 491 Audrey 11-May-16 23:13
Re: Vessel manufacture 488 Thanos5150 12-May-16 00:26
Re: Vessel manufacture 446 Corpuscles 12-May-16 00:41
Re: Vessel manufacture 523 Thanos5150 12-May-16 01:13
Re: Vessel manufacture 532 Corpuscles 12-May-16 02:32
Re: Vessel manufacture 747 Thanos5150 12-May-16 06:10
Re: Vessel manufacture 570 Audrey 12-May-16 01:22
Re: Vessel manufacture 511 Thanos5150 12-May-16 01:52
Re: Vessel manufacture 481 Origyptian 12-May-16 02:26
Re: Vessel manufacture 409 Thanos5150 12-May-16 02:52
Re: Vessel manufacture 490 Martin Stower 12-May-16 21:22
Re: Vessel manufacture 495 Jon Ellison 12-May-16 02:01
Re: Vessel manufacture 439 Origyptian 12-May-16 02:20
Re: Vessel manufacture 481 Martin Stower 13-May-16 00:25
Re: Vessel manufacture 626 Martin Stower 12-May-16 13:23
Re: Vessel manufacture 532 Harte 12-May-16 22:15
Re: Vessel manufacture 472 Martin Stower 12-May-16 23:38
Re: Vessel manufacture 469 Thanos5150 13-May-16 00:28
Re: Vessel manufacture 470 Audrey 11-May-16 20:07
Re: Vessel manufacture 749 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:35
Re: Vessel manufacture 411 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:19
Re: Vessel manufacture 476 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 20:26
Re: Vessel manufacture 502 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:39
Re: Vessel manufacture 504 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 20:42
Re: Vessel manufacture 448 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:48
Re: Vessel manufacture 620 Corpuscles 11-May-16 23:52
Re: Vessel manufacture 608 Thanos5150 12-May-16 05:39
Re: Vessel manufacture 458 Corpuscles 12-May-16 08:12
Re: Vessel manufacture 463 DScribr 12-May-16 03:08
Re: Vessel manufacture 714 Audrey 11-May-16 19:55
Re: Vessel manufacture 529 Thanos5150 11-May-16 20:07
Re: Vessel manufacture 627 Origyptian 11-May-16 19:58
Re: Vessel manufacture 426 Corpuscles 11-May-16 23:25
Re: Vessel manufacture 481 Thanos5150 12-May-16 01:06
Re: Vessel manufacture 547 Audrey 12-May-16 01:47
Re: Vessel manufacture 454 Thanos5150 12-May-16 02:18
Re: Vessel manufacture 475 Martin Stower 13-May-16 00:03
Re: Vessel manufacture 549 Origyptian 12-May-16 02:34
Re: Vessel manufacture 491 Corpuscles 12-May-16 03:12
Re: Vessel manufacture 494 Thanos5150 12-May-16 04:05
Re: Vessel manufacture 474 Origyptian 12-May-16 04:23
Re: Vessel manufacture 534 Corpuscles 12-May-16 04:31
Re: Vessel manufacture 479 Audrey 12-May-16 06:44
Re: Vessel manufacture 443 Origyptian 12-May-16 04:16
Re: Vessel manufacture 566 Corpuscles 12-May-16 04:52
Re: Vessel manufacture 500 Origyptian 12-May-16 13:35
Re: Vessel manufacture 488 Martin Stower 12-May-16 21:49
Re: Vessel manufacture 489 Origyptian 12-May-16 22:07
Re: Vessel manufacture 488 Martin Stower 12-May-16 23:15
Re: Vessel manufacture 594 Origyptian 13-May-16 03:46
Re: Vessel manufacture 479 Martin Stower 13-May-16 18:31
Re: Vessel manufacture 406 DScribr 12-May-16 02:58
Re: Creighton persists 483 Martin Stower 12-May-16 11:42
Re: Creighton persists 462 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 11:00
Re: Creighton persists 492 Audrey 11-May-16 15:55
Re: Creighton persists 523 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 16:39
Re: Creighton persists 537 Audrey 09-May-16 01:44
Re: Creighton persists 579 Merrell 08-May-16 20:16
Re: Creighton persists 558 Audrey 08-May-16 20:36
Re: Creighton persists 586 Merrell 08-May-16 21:07
Re: Creighton persists 463 Audrey 08-May-16 21:10
Re: Creighton persists 568 Merrell 08-May-16 21:38
Re: Creighton persists 526 Audrey 08-May-16 21:59
Re: Creighton persists 519 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 21:27
Re: Creighton persists 529 Audrey 08-May-16 21:34
Re: Creighton persists 419 Origyptian 09-May-16 03:07
Re: Creighton persists 556 Audrey 09-May-16 03:18
Re: Creighton persists 493 Origyptian 09-May-16 04:06
Re: Creighton persists 538 Audrey 09-May-16 05:07
Re: Creighton persists 551 Origyptian 09-May-16 13:06
Re: Creighton persists 551 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 12:00
Re: Creighton persists 436 Origyptian 09-May-16 13:17
Re: Creighton persists 511 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 13:29
Re: Creighton persists 487 DScribr 09-May-16 13:30
Re: Creighton persists 512 Origyptian 09-May-16 02:09
Re: Creighton persists 513 Origyptian 09-May-16 01:49
Re: Creighton persists 585 Origyptian 08-May-16 02:13
Re: Creighton persists 332 Origyptian 08-May-16 02:07
Re: Drill baby drill.... 603 Thunderbird 08-May-16 02:41
Re: Drill baby drill.... 764 Origyptian 08-May-16 03:23
Re: Drill baby drill.... 626 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 11:38
We've been thru this 100 times. 482 DScribr 09-May-16 00:41
Re: We've been thru this 100 times. 655 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 01:00
Re: Drill baby drill.... 779 Harte 08-May-16 19:35
Re: Drill baby drill.... 552 DScribr 09-May-16 00:45
Re: Drill baby drill.... 567 Origyptian 09-May-16 02:14
Re: OK. ..let's do some flooring now 614 Thunderbird 08-May-16 19:41
Re: OK. ..let's do some flooring now 590 Audrey 08-May-16 20:49
Re: OK. ..let's do some flooring now 569 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 20:55
Re: OK. ..let's do some flooring now 459 Audrey 08-May-16 21:09
Re: OK. ..let's do some flooring now 453 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 21:14
Re: OK. ..let's do some flooring now 549 Audrey 08-May-16 21:22
Too much interpretation 495 DScribr 09-May-16 00:36
Re: Too much interpretation 462 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 00:41
Refusal Persists 478 DScribr 09-May-16 00:21
Re: Creighton persists 462 Audrey 07-May-16 02:02
Re: Creighton persists 562 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 02:55
Re: Creighton persists 604 Audrey 07-May-16 04:14
Re: Creighton persists 534 Origyptian 06-May-16 18:21
Re: Creighton persists 469 Audrey 06-May-16 19:03
Re: Creighton persists 619 Martin Stower 07-May-16 01:00
Re: Creighton persists 517 Origyptian 06-May-16 20:12
Logic rarely persists here. 598 DScribr 08-May-16 20:40
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 540 Corpuscles 08-May-16 21:51
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 560 Origyptian 09-May-16 03:20
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 545 Harte 09-May-16 21:18
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 540 DScribr 10-May-16 02:23
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 682 Corpuscles 10-May-16 03:11
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 560 DScribr 10-May-16 03:38
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 586 Corpuscles 10-May-16 03:54
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 515 DScribr 10-May-16 13:42
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 594 Harte 10-May-16 10:03
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 515