Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >... SNIP
> > I treat everyone respectfully
> > who agree and who respectfully disagree with
> me.
> >
> > But start with the thuggish sarcasm, name
> calling,
> > character assassination, etc. and the gloves
> come
> > off.
>
> Now STOP, LOOK at page 12, and THINK!
>
> Page 12
>
>
Quote
Direct quote - Origyptian
> Author: Origyptian ()
>
> Date: May 11, 2016 07:58PM
>
> Thanos5150 Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------
> ------
> >
> > So the mystery is not "if" the AE made stone
> > vessels, which is incredibly stupid to say
> otherwise...
>
> YOU SAID!
>
> See, it's exactly that kind of myopic pompous
> arrogance
that makes you so difficult to
> converse with.
>
>
>
>
> You started the drama with Thanos!
>
> UNDENIABLE FACT!
>
> The original post from Thanos was to me and it
> means.... it would be incredibly stupid to suggest
> that AE did not make any stone vessels!
>
>
> THINK hard!
>
> Cheers

Let's not stop there. Jon's direct response to what I said was:
Quote

I don't think is incredibly stupid at all, There is no evidence in the archaeological record of the tools, means or methods that could have remotely, possibly produced the one piece narrow necked vessels.

He is not offended and understands I am talking about the idea and not any person or group.

Now lets look at Audrey's first response:
Thanos says:
Quote

So the mystery is not "if" the AE made stone vessels, which is incredibly stupid to say otherwise, it is why does this quality appear suddenly in Archaic Dynastic times (Dynasty 00/0), hand in hand with monumental noble tombs and boat
> burials among other curiosities, so fully developed and of a quality that is unsurpassed in later times (no, this is not an invitation to make a vapid comment about an antediluvian lost civilization). Most telling, to me anyways, is that this also all begins with the appearance of this: And it is here that Dynastic Egypt begins.

Audrey's reply:
Quote

It is "here" that the homesteaders planted their butts and began to graffiti everything in sight.

She is not offended and understands I am talking about the idea and not any person or group.

No outcry or indignation that I am supposedly calling people "stupid" that followed in nearly each of her responses only after Origyptian's post which he first says this:
Quote

See, it's exactly that kind of myopic pompous arrogance that makes you so difficult to converse with....

So what is it about these scenes are seem so "obvious" to you to the point of calling anyone disagreeing with you, "incredibly stupid"?....

It's "incredibly stupid" to deny that provenance, eh? Nothing incredibly stupid about having blind faith acceptance of such attribution without any rationale other than attempted intimidation thrown at anyone who disagrees due to the lack of any tools and methods that could accomplish such precision stonework? You truly think yours is such an extremely credible position?....

What unbelievably "obvious" tools and methods that were used to make these things, Thanos, that would justify you calling anyone who expresses skepticism so "incredibly stupid"?....

Oh, that's "interesting" to you, is it? You means you're not being "incredibly stupid" for not understanding why all the stuff that orthodoxy claims to have been made with the oldest technology happens to be the best stuff?....

It's all so obvious...except for some "interesting" stuff that you can't explain and yet feel no compulsion to consider in your paradigm since it just might stir up that neat little self-consistent house of cards.

"Incredibly stupid" indeed.

Yeesh. And that is but the parts which include the words "incredibly stupid". Which despite being corrected Origyptian repeats several more times in all of his subsequent posts to the effect: "You're the one calling people "incredibly stupid"."

Now let's look at Audrey's following responses:

Quote

BS. You called me stupid, it's insulting, pisses me off and who the hell do you think you are anyways.
Speak for yourself! You don't know what every poster is thinking. The audacity to say so do is.......

Yes you did call people stupid, in plural....

Or would that be a "stupid" "dishonest" "vapid" "lie"....

Unless you're suggesting that I believe it because Egyptology says so? That would be stupid.

I'll never learn that you know it all (like you're showing us an obvious truth and how stupid that I don't see it). I don't like your tone....

And probably nothing more than that. If that's good enough for you, fine, far be it for me to call you stupid for being so accepting of what I reject....

Vapid, stupid, dishonest, lie, were words you used for others.

The rest of her posts are simply trollish bile directed at me personally if anyone even cares to follow along.

And now John is confused all of a sudden as well (though to his credit, however small, halfheartedly):

Quote

Is your implication of stupidity a term of endearment?...

Though he backtracks acknowledging again it was said about an idea:
Quote

Frankly I don't see anything stupid about any one of them [ideas he presents].

But unfortunately the confusion begins again:
Quote

In that case whom were you referring to as "stupid"?

And they are the ones who complain people attack them just for disagreeing with them? Pfft. Nonsense.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Creighton persists 3710 Martin Stower 30-Apr-16 23:26
Some may also be wondering . . . 666 Martin Stower 30-Apr-16 23:37
Re: Creighton persists 808 Frank D 30-Apr-16 23:41
On a natural reading . . . 774 Martin Stower 01-May-16 00:44
Re: On a natural reading . . . 587 Hanslune 01-May-16 05:25
Re: On a natural reading . . . 675 Martin Stower 01-May-16 13:53
Re: On a natural reading . . . 585 Hanslune 01-May-16 14:42
And who will guard the Guards? 599 LonelyAngel 09-May-16 09:08
Re: And who will guard the Guards? 627 Origyptian 09-May-16 12:47
Re: And who will guard the Guards? 618 DScribr 09-May-16 13:21
Re: And who will guard the Guards? 733 LonelyAngel 09-May-16 13:48
Re: And who will read his book? 545 DScribr 10-May-16 02:05
Re: And who will guard the Guards? 587 Martin Stower 16-May-16 23:01
Re: And who will guard the Guards? 625 Martin Stower 09-May-16 19:00
Re: And who will guard the Guards? 518 Corpuscles 09-May-16 20:07
Re: And who will accept the facts? 584 DScribr 10-May-16 02:21
Re: And who will accept the facts? 568 Corpuscles 10-May-16 03:01
Re: And who will accept the facts? 516 DScribr 10-May-16 03:30
Re: And who will accept the facts? 521 Corpuscles 10-May-16 03:47
Re: And who will accept the facts? 452 DScribr 10-May-16 13:32
Re: And who will accept the facts? 425 Harte 10-May-16 20:53
Re: And who will accept the facts? 542 Origyptian 10-May-16 21:14
Change Of Tune!?! 584 DScribr 11-May-16 01:54
The certainty of contamination 558 DScribr 11-May-16 01:44
Re: And who will accept the facts? 533 Frank D 11-May-16 23:40
Re: And who will accept the facts? 501 DScribr 12-May-16 02:52
Re: And who will guard the Henhouse??? 536 DScribr 10-May-16 02:11
Re: And who will guard the Henhouse??? 577 LonelyAngel 10-May-16 12:40
Re: And who will guard the Henhouse??? 529 Origyptian 10-May-16 13:16
Re: And who will guard the Henhouse??? 541 DScribr 10-May-16 13:35
Re: On reading about 'proof' 492 DScribr 07-May-16 15:56
Re: On reading about 'proof' 544 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 16:39
Re: Creighton persists 652 drrayeye 01-May-16 15:10
Re: Creighton persists 670 Martin Stower 01-May-16 16:21
Re: Attack!....Attack! 582 Thunderbird 01-May-16 22:47
Re: Attack!....Attack! 655 Martin Stower 01-May-16 23:19
Re: Attack!....Attack! 652 Hanslune 02-May-16 01:26
Re: Attack!....Attack! 606 Martin Stower 02-May-16 20:25
Re: Attack!....Attack! 672 Hanslune 02-May-16 21:12
Re: Creighton persists 619 cladking 02-May-16 00:22
Re: Creighton persists 646 Martin Stower 02-May-16 01:11
Re: Creighton persists 577 cladking 02-May-16 01:31
Re: Creighton persists 619 Martin Stower 02-May-16 20:03
Re: Creighton persists 591 cladking 03-May-16 00:50
Re: Creighton persists 566 Hanslune 03-May-16 06:00
Re: Creighton persists 537 Merrell 03-May-16 07:34
Re: Creighton persists 704 Origyptian 03-May-16 11:46
Re: Creighton persists 658 Martin Stower 03-May-16 14:01
Re: Creighton persists 687 Origyptian 03-May-16 21:55
Re: Creighton persists 628 Martin Stower 03-May-16 22:54
Re: Creighton persists 657 Origyptian 04-May-16 03:49
Re: Creighton persists 670 Thanos5150 03-May-16 18:26
Re: Creighton persists 590 Origyptian 03-May-16 21:09
Re: Creighton persists 663 Martin Stower 03-May-16 22:56
Re: Creighton persists 624 Origyptian 04-May-16 03:52
Re: Creighton persists 580 Martin Stower 04-May-16 17:54
Re: Creighton persists 566 Origyptian 04-May-16 21:06
Re: Creighton persists 788 Martin Stower 04-May-16 22:28
Re: Creighton persists 592 Harte 06-May-16 10:17
Re: Creighton persists 562 Origyptian 06-May-16 13:04
Re: Creighton persists 504 Martin Stower 06-May-16 15:35
Re: Creighton persists 574 Harte 06-May-16 16:50
Re: Creighton persists 524 Jon Ellison 06-May-16 17:33
Re: Creighton persists 498 Audrey 06-May-16 20:00
Re: Creighton persists 663 Jon Ellison 06-May-16 20:25
Re: Creighton persists 573 Jon Ellison 06-May-16 20:48
Re: Creighton persists 612 Archae Solenhofen 06-May-16 22:30
Re: Creighton persists 517 Jon Ellison 06-May-16 23:37
Re: Creighton persists 541 Martin Stower 07-May-16 00:02
Re: Creighton persists 545 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 00:33
Re: Creighton persists 557 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 01:07
Re: Creighton persists 561 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 01:55
Re: Creighton persists 417 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 02:03
Re: Creighton persists 583 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 05:06
Re: Creighton persists 448 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 10:39
Re: Creighton persists 490 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 16:38
Re: Creighton persists 523 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 17:03
Some "Engineer" 771 DScribr 08-May-16 20:54
Re: Some "Engineer" 514 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 21:00
Re: Some "Engineer" 611 Audrey 08-May-16 21:15
Re: Some "Engineer" 612 DScribr 08-May-16 21:33
Re: Some "Engineer" 574 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 21:44
Re: Creighton persists 554 Audrey 07-May-16 02:09
Re: Creighton persists 534 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 02:16
Re: Creighton persists 549 Luminescence 08-May-16 01:52
Another "Impossibility" 550 DScribr 08-May-16 21:36
Re: Creighton persists 551 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 02:23
Re: Creighton persists 612 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 05:16
my mysterious balls 615 Audrey 07-May-16 06:42
Re: Creighton persists 426 Origyptian 07-May-16 15:51
Re: Creighton persists 488 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 17:12
Re: Creighton persists 439 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 17:23
Re: Creighton persists 558 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 17:53
Re: Creighton persists 498 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 18:40
Re: Creighton persists 525 Audrey 07-May-16 19:30
Re: Creighton persists 494 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 20:11
Re: Creighton persists 503 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 00:06
Re: Creighton persists 562 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 01:23
Re: Creighton persists 498 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 09:48
Re: Creighton persists 439 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 11:34
Re: Creighton persists 471 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 17:32
Re: Creighton persists 472 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 20:07
Re: Creighton persists 482 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 20:24
Re: Creighton persists 455 Origyptian 09-May-16 02:37
Re: Creighton persists 422 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 10:32
Re: Creighton persists 516 Origyptian 09-May-16 12:58
Re: Creighton persists 566 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 13:25
Re: Creighton persists 457 Origyptian 09-May-16 13:30
Re: Creighton persists 484 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 13:33
Re: Creighton persists 475 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 20:44
Re: Creighton persists 451 Origyptian 08-May-16 15:31
Re: Creighton persists 418 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 16:17
Failure to acept the facts persists 502 DScribr 08-May-16 22:11
Re: Failure to acept the facts persists 535 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 22:26
Re: Failure to acept the facts persists 530 DScribr 09-May-16 00:29
Re: Creighton persists 489 Audrey 08-May-16 17:37
Re: Creighton persists 526 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 18:30
Re: Creighton persists 524 Audrey 08-May-16 18:52
Re: Creighton persists 559 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 20:13
Re: Creighton persists 431 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 20:20
Re: Creighton persists 523 Audrey 08-May-16 20:35
Re: Creighton persists 529 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 22:05
Re: Creighton persists 490 Audrey 08-May-16 23:05
Re: Creighton persists 475 Archae Solenhofen 09-May-16 00:11
Re: Creighton persists 515 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 00:35
Re: Creighton persists 440 Corpuscles 09-May-16 01:28
Re: Creighton persists 551 Origyptian 09-May-16 17:15
Re: Creighton persists 504 Corpuscles 09-May-16 19:40
Re: Creighton persists 459 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 20:02
Re: Creighton persists 508 Origyptian 09-May-16 21:25
Re: Creighton persists 609 Martin Stower 09-May-16 22:16
Re: Creighton persists 545 Origyptian 09-May-16 23:06
Re: Creighton persists 558 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 23:33
Re: Creighton persists 509 Martin Stower 09-May-16 23:41
Re: Creighton persists 543 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 23:45
Re: Creighton persists 585 Martin Stower 09-May-16 23:58
Re: Creighton persists 483 Jon Ellison 10-May-16 01:05
Re: Creighton persists 474 Martin Stower 10-May-16 19:32
Re: Creighton persists 500 Origyptian 10-May-16 20:31
Re: Creighton persists 534 Martin Stower 10-May-16 20:45
What Standards? 437 DScribr 10-May-16 02:37
Re: Creighton persists 363 Jon Ellison 10-May-16 14:45
Re: Creighton persists 474 Origyptian 10-May-16 14:53
Re: Creighton persists 542 Jon Ellison 10-May-16 15:00
Re: Creighton persists 554 Audrey 11-May-16 00:53
Re: Creighton persists 557 Martin Stower 11-May-16 01:43
Also . . . 528 Martin Stower 11-May-16 09:19
Re: Creighton persists 441 Origyptian 11-May-16 03:14
Re: Creighton persists 592 Martin Stower 11-May-16 10:17
Re: Creighton persists 556 Corpuscles 11-May-16 10:53
Re: Vessel manufacture 701 Thanos5150 11-May-16 17:24
Re: Vessel manufacture 456 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 18:11
Re: Vessel manufacture 707 Thanos5150 11-May-16 19:30
Re: Vessel manufacture 462 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:02
Re: Vessel manufacture 415 Thanos5150 11-May-16 20:26
Re: Vessel manufacture 479 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 20:36
Re: Vessel manufacture 431 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:58
Re: Vessel manufacture 454 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 21:07
Re: Vessel manufacture 458 Thanos5150 11-May-16 21:18
Re: Vessel manufacture 497 Origyptian 11-May-16 21:35
Re: Vessel manufacture 466 Thanos5150 11-May-16 21:49
Re: Vessel manufacture 396 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 21:58
Re: Vessel manufacture 448 Thanos5150 11-May-16 22:02
Re: Vessel manufacture 490 Origyptian 11-May-16 22:25
Re: Vessel manufacture 413 Origyptian 11-May-16 22:19
Re: Vessel manufacture 444 Origyptian 11-May-16 22:03
Re: Vessel manufacture 563 Thanos5150 11-May-16 22:15
Re: Vessel manufacture 477 Origyptian 11-May-16 22:26
Re: Vessel manufacture 469 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 21:41
Re: Vessel manufacture 431 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:41
Re: Vessel manufacture 429 Thanos5150 11-May-16 20:55
Re: Vessel manufacture 445 Origyptian 11-May-16 21:07
Re: Vessel manufacture 387 Audrey 11-May-16 21:12
Re: Vessel manufacture 439 Thanos5150 11-May-16 21:20
Re: Vessel manufacture 488 Origyptian 11-May-16 21:44
Re: Vessel manufacture 460 Thanos5150 11-May-16 21:58
Re: Vessel manufacture 493 Origyptian 11-May-16 22:23
Re: Vessel manufacture 475 Thanos5150 11-May-16 22:41
Re: Vessel manufacture 467 Audrey 11-May-16 21:56
Re: Vessel manufacture 426 Thanos5150 11-May-16 22:08
Re: Vessel manufacture 414 Thanos5150 11-May-16 21:35
Re: Vessel manufacture 428 Audrey 11-May-16 22:40
Re: Vessel manufacture 419 Thanos5150 11-May-16 22:44
Re: Vessel manufacture 448 Audrey 11-May-16 23:13
Re: Vessel manufacture 444 Thanos5150 12-May-16 00:26
Re: Vessel manufacture 407 Corpuscles 12-May-16 00:41
Re: Vessel manufacture 478 Thanos5150 12-May-16 01:13
Re: Vessel manufacture 490 Corpuscles 12-May-16 02:32
Re: Vessel manufacture 639 Thanos5150 12-May-16 06:10
Re: Vessel manufacture 530 Audrey 12-May-16 01:22
Re: Vessel manufacture 473 Thanos5150 12-May-16 01:52
Re: Vessel manufacture 440 Origyptian 12-May-16 02:26
Re: Vessel manufacture 367 Thanos5150 12-May-16 02:52
Re: Vessel manufacture 446 Martin Stower 12-May-16 21:22
Re: Vessel manufacture 454 Jon Ellison 12-May-16 02:01
Re: Vessel manufacture 392 Origyptian 12-May-16 02:20
Re: Vessel manufacture 442 Martin Stower 13-May-16 00:25
Re: Vessel manufacture 586 Martin Stower 12-May-16 13:23
Re: Vessel manufacture 482 Harte 12-May-16 22:15
Re: Vessel manufacture 429 Martin Stower 12-May-16 23:38
Re: Vessel manufacture 428 Thanos5150 13-May-16 00:28
Re: Vessel manufacture 423 Audrey 11-May-16 20:07
Re: Vessel manufacture 601 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:35
Re: Vessel manufacture 369 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:19
Re: Vessel manufacture 435 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 20:26
Re: Vessel manufacture 461 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:39
Re: Vessel manufacture 466 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 20:42
Re: Vessel manufacture 404 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:48
Re: Vessel manufacture 581 Corpuscles 11-May-16 23:52
Re: Vessel manufacture 564 Thanos5150 12-May-16 05:39
Re: Vessel manufacture 414 Corpuscles 12-May-16 08:12
Re: Vessel manufacture 426 DScribr 12-May-16 03:08
Re: Vessel manufacture 615 Audrey 11-May-16 19:55
Re: Vessel manufacture 483 Thanos5150 11-May-16 20:07
Re: Vessel manufacture 583 Origyptian 11-May-16 19:58
Re: Vessel manufacture 388 Corpuscles 11-May-16 23:25
Re: Vessel manufacture 436 Thanos5150 12-May-16 01:06
Re: Vessel manufacture 502 Audrey 12-May-16 01:47
Re: Vessel manufacture 410 Thanos5150 12-May-16 02:18
Re: Vessel manufacture 433 Martin Stower 13-May-16 00:03
Re: Vessel manufacture 508 Origyptian 12-May-16 02:34
Re: Vessel manufacture 451 Corpuscles 12-May-16 03:12
Re: Vessel manufacture 454 Thanos5150 12-May-16 04:05
Re: Vessel manufacture 431 Origyptian 12-May-16 04:23
Re: Vessel manufacture 491 Corpuscles 12-May-16 04:31
Re: Vessel manufacture 440 Audrey 12-May-16 06:44
Re: Vessel manufacture 396 Origyptian 12-May-16 04:16
Re: Vessel manufacture 525 Corpuscles 12-May-16 04:52
Re: Vessel manufacture 459 Origyptian 12-May-16 13:35
Re: Vessel manufacture 446 Martin Stower 12-May-16 21:49
Re: Vessel manufacture 449 Origyptian 12-May-16 22:07
Re: Vessel manufacture 447 Martin Stower 12-May-16 23:15
Re: Vessel manufacture 551 Origyptian 13-May-16 03:46
Re: Vessel manufacture 437 Martin Stower 13-May-16 18:31
Re: Vessel manufacture 367 DScribr 12-May-16 02:58
Re: Creighton persists 440 Martin Stower 12-May-16 11:42
Re: Creighton persists 421 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 11:00
Re: Creighton persists 445 Audrey 11-May-16 15:55
Re: Creighton persists 481 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 16:39
Re: Creighton persists 489 Audrey 09-May-16 01:44
Re: Creighton persists 540 Merrell 08-May-16 20:16
Re: Creighton persists 518 Audrey 08-May-16 20:36
Re: Creighton persists 544 Merrell 08-May-16 21:07
Re: Creighton persists 424 Audrey 08-May-16 21:10
Re: Creighton persists 523 Merrell 08-May-16 21:38
Re: Creighton persists 484 Audrey 08-May-16 21:59
Re: Creighton persists 455 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 21:27
Re: Creighton persists 488 Audrey 08-May-16 21:34
Re: Creighton persists 377 Origyptian 09-May-16 03:07
Re: Creighton persists 512 Audrey 09-May-16 03:18
Re: Creighton persists 448 Origyptian 09-May-16 04:06
Re: Creighton persists 497 Audrey 09-May-16 05:07
Re: Creighton persists 509 Origyptian 09-May-16 13:06
Re: Creighton persists 503 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 12:00
Re: Creighton persists 391 Origyptian 09-May-16 13:17
Re: Creighton persists 473 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 13:29
Re: Creighton persists 446 DScribr 09-May-16 13:30
Re: Creighton persists 470 Origyptian 09-May-16 02:09
Re: Creighton persists 470 Origyptian 09-May-16 01:49
Re: Creighton persists 541 Origyptian 08-May-16 02:13
Re: Creighton persists 292 Origyptian 08-May-16 02:07
Re: Drill baby drill.... 559 Thunderbird 08-May-16 02:41
Re: Drill baby drill.... 719 Origyptian 08-May-16 03:23
Re: Drill baby drill.... 585 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 11:38
We've been thru this 100 times. 438 DScribr 09-May-16 00:41
Re: We've been thru this 100 times. 496 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 01:00
Re: Drill baby drill.... 727 Harte 08-May-16 19:35
Re: Drill baby drill.... 507 DScribr 09-May-16 00:45
Re: Drill baby drill.... 523 Origyptian 09-May-16 02:14
Re: OK. ..let's do some flooring now 569 Thunderbird 08-May-16 19:41
Re: OK. ..let's do some flooring now 536 Audrey 08-May-16 20:49
Re: OK. ..let's do some flooring now 457 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 20:55
Re: OK. ..let's do some flooring now 396 Audrey 08-May-16 21:09
Re: OK. ..let's do some flooring now 411 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 21:14
Re: OK. ..let's do some flooring now 494 Audrey 08-May-16 21:22
Too much interpretation 451 DScribr 09-May-16 00:36
Re: Too much interpretation 419 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 00:41
Refusal Persists 435 DScribr 09-May-16 00:21
Re: Creighton persists 421 Audrey 07-May-16 02:02
Re: Creighton persists 520 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 02:55
Re: Creighton persists 431 Audrey 07-May-16 04:14
Re: Creighton persists 492 Origyptian 06-May-16 18:21
Re: Creighton persists 422 Audrey 06-May-16 19:03
Re: Creighton persists 577 Martin Stower 07-May-16 01:00
Re: Creighton persists 478 Origyptian 06-May-16 20:12
Logic rarely persists here. 550 DScribr 08-May-16 20:40
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 499 Corpuscles 08-May-16 21:51
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 512 Origyptian 09-May-16 03:20
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 427 Harte 09-May-16 21:18
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 497 DScribr 10-May-16 02:23
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 641 Corpuscles 10-May-16 03:11
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 521 DScribr 10-May-16 03:38
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 539 Corpuscles 10-May-16 03:54
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 474 DScribr 10-May-16 13:42
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 509 Harte 10-May-16 10:03
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 475 Jon Ellison 10-May-16 10:06