Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >... SNIP
> > I treat everyone respectfully
> > who agree and who respectfully disagree with
> me.
> >
> > But start with the thuggish sarcasm, name
> calling,
> > character assassination, etc. and the gloves
> come
> > off.
>
> Now STOP, LOOK at page 12, and THINK!
>
> Page 12
>
>
Quote
Direct quote - Origyptian
> Author: Origyptian ()
>
> Date: May 11, 2016 07:58PM
>
> Thanos5150 Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------
> ------
> >
> > So the mystery is not "if" the AE made stone
> > vessels, which is incredibly stupid to say
> otherwise...
>
> YOU SAID!
>
> See, it's exactly that kind of myopic pompous
> arrogance
that makes you so difficult to
> converse with.
>
>
>
>
> You started the drama with Thanos!
>
> UNDENIABLE FACT!
>
> The original post from Thanos was to me and it
> means.... it would be incredibly stupid to suggest
> that AE did not make any stone vessels!
>
>
> THINK hard!
>
> Cheers

Let's not stop there. Jon's direct response to what I said was:
Quote

I don't think is incredibly stupid at all, There is no evidence in the archaeological record of the tools, means or methods that could have remotely, possibly produced the one piece narrow necked vessels.

He is not offended and understands I am talking about the idea and not any person or group.

Now lets look at Audrey's first response:
Thanos says:
Quote

So the mystery is not "if" the AE made stone vessels, which is incredibly stupid to say otherwise, it is why does this quality appear suddenly in Archaic Dynastic times (Dynasty 00/0), hand in hand with monumental noble tombs and boat
> burials among other curiosities, so fully developed and of a quality that is unsurpassed in later times (no, this is not an invitation to make a vapid comment about an antediluvian lost civilization). Most telling, to me anyways, is that this also all begins with the appearance of this: And it is here that Dynastic Egypt begins.

Audrey's reply:
Quote

It is "here" that the homesteaders planted their butts and began to graffiti everything in sight.

She is not offended and understands I am talking about the idea and not any person or group.

No outcry or indignation that I am supposedly calling people "stupid" that followed in nearly each of her responses only after Origyptian's post which he first says this:
Quote

See, it's exactly that kind of myopic pompous arrogance that makes you so difficult to converse with....

So what is it about these scenes are seem so "obvious" to you to the point of calling anyone disagreeing with you, "incredibly stupid"?....

It's "incredibly stupid" to deny that provenance, eh? Nothing incredibly stupid about having blind faith acceptance of such attribution without any rationale other than attempted intimidation thrown at anyone who disagrees due to the lack of any tools and methods that could accomplish such precision stonework? You truly think yours is such an extremely credible position?....

What unbelievably "obvious" tools and methods that were used to make these things, Thanos, that would justify you calling anyone who expresses skepticism so "incredibly stupid"?....

Oh, that's "interesting" to you, is it? You means you're not being "incredibly stupid" for not understanding why all the stuff that orthodoxy claims to have been made with the oldest technology happens to be the best stuff?....

It's all so obvious...except for some "interesting" stuff that you can't explain and yet feel no compulsion to consider in your paradigm since it just might stir up that neat little self-consistent house of cards.

"Incredibly stupid" indeed.

Yeesh. And that is but the parts which include the words "incredibly stupid". Which despite being corrected Origyptian repeats several more times in all of his subsequent posts to the effect: "You're the one calling people "incredibly stupid"."

Now let's look at Audrey's following responses:

Quote

BS. You called me stupid, it's insulting, pisses me off and who the hell do you think you are anyways.
Speak for yourself! You don't know what every poster is thinking. The audacity to say so do is.......

Yes you did call people stupid, in plural....

Or would that be a "stupid" "dishonest" "vapid" "lie"....

Unless you're suggesting that I believe it because Egyptology says so? That would be stupid.

I'll never learn that you know it all (like you're showing us an obvious truth and how stupid that I don't see it). I don't like your tone....

And probably nothing more than that. If that's good enough for you, fine, far be it for me to call you stupid for being so accepting of what I reject....

Vapid, stupid, dishonest, lie, were words you used for others.

The rest of her posts are simply trollish bile directed at me personally if anyone even cares to follow along.

And now John is confused all of a sudden as well (though to his credit, however small, halfheartedly):

Quote

Is your implication of stupidity a term of endearment?...

Though he backtracks acknowledging again it was said about an idea:
Quote

Frankly I don't see anything stupid about any one of them [ideas he presents].

But unfortunately the confusion begins again:
Quote

In that case whom were you referring to as "stupid"?

And they are the ones who complain people attack them just for disagreeing with them? Pfft. Nonsense.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Creighton persists 3883 Martin Stower 30-Apr-16 23:26
Some may also be wondering . . . 701 Martin Stower 30-Apr-16 23:37
Re: Creighton persists 850 Frank D 30-Apr-16 23:41
On a natural reading . . . 859 Martin Stower 01-May-16 00:44
Re: On a natural reading . . . 623 Hanslune 01-May-16 05:25
Re: On a natural reading . . . 714 Martin Stower 01-May-16 13:53
Re: On a natural reading . . . 624 Hanslune 01-May-16 14:42
And who will guard the Guards? 632 LonelyAngel 09-May-16 09:08
Re: And who will guard the Guards? 799 Origyptian 09-May-16 12:47
Re: And who will guard the Guards? 651 DScribr 09-May-16 13:21
Re: And who will guard the Guards? 767 LonelyAngel 09-May-16 13:48
Re: And who will read his book? 581 DScribr 10-May-16 02:05
Re: And who will guard the Guards? 619 Martin Stower 16-May-16 23:01
Re: And who will guard the Guards? 662 Martin Stower 09-May-16 19:00
Re: And who will guard the Guards? 627 Corpuscles 09-May-16 20:07
Re: And who will accept the facts? 620 DScribr 10-May-16 02:21
Re: And who will accept the facts? 602 Corpuscles 10-May-16 03:01
Re: And who will accept the facts? 551 DScribr 10-May-16 03:30
Re: And who will accept the facts? 569 Corpuscles 10-May-16 03:47
Re: And who will accept the facts? 488 DScribr 10-May-16 13:32
Re: And who will accept the facts? 463 Harte 10-May-16 20:53
Re: And who will accept the facts? 579 Origyptian 10-May-16 21:14
Change Of Tune!?! 718 DScribr 11-May-16 01:54
The certainty of contamination 593 DScribr 11-May-16 01:44
Re: And who will accept the facts? 574 Frank D 11-May-16 23:40
Re: And who will accept the facts? 539 DScribr 12-May-16 02:52
Re: And who will guard the Henhouse??? 571 DScribr 10-May-16 02:11
Re: And who will guard the Henhouse??? 664 LonelyAngel 10-May-16 12:40
Re: And who will guard the Henhouse??? 563 Origyptian 10-May-16 13:16
Re: And who will guard the Henhouse??? 618 DScribr 10-May-16 13:35
Re: On reading about 'proof' 528 DScribr 07-May-16 15:56
Re: On reading about 'proof' 579 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 16:39
Re: Creighton persists 872 drrayeye 01-May-16 15:10
Re: Creighton persists 709 Martin Stower 01-May-16 16:21
Re: Attack!....Attack! 617 Thunderbird 01-May-16 22:47
Re: Attack!....Attack! 710 Martin Stower 01-May-16 23:19
Re: Attack!....Attack! 688 Hanslune 02-May-16 01:26
Re: Attack!....Attack! 679 Martin Stower 02-May-16 20:25
Re: Attack!....Attack! 704 Hanslune 02-May-16 21:12
Re: Creighton persists 728 cladking 02-May-16 00:22
Re: Creighton persists 681 Martin Stower 02-May-16 01:11
Re: Creighton persists 611 cladking 02-May-16 01:31
Re: Creighton persists 655 Martin Stower 02-May-16 20:03
Re: Creighton persists 629 cladking 03-May-16 00:50
Re: Creighton persists 600 Hanslune 03-May-16 06:00
Re: Creighton persists 574 Merrell 03-May-16 07:34
Re: Creighton persists 807 Origyptian 03-May-16 11:46
Re: Creighton persists 710 Martin Stower 03-May-16 14:01
Re: Creighton persists 773 Origyptian 03-May-16 21:55
Re: Creighton persists 683 Martin Stower 03-May-16 22:54
Re: Creighton persists 692 Origyptian 04-May-16 03:49
Re: Creighton persists 703 Thanos5150 03-May-16 18:26
Re: Creighton persists 672 Origyptian 03-May-16 21:09
Re: Creighton persists 732 Martin Stower 03-May-16 22:56
Re: Creighton persists 656 Origyptian 04-May-16 03:52
Re: Creighton persists 620 Martin Stower 04-May-16 17:54
Re: Creighton persists 608 Origyptian 04-May-16 21:06
Re: Creighton persists 924 Martin Stower 04-May-16 22:28
Re: Creighton persists 630 Harte 06-May-16 10:17
Re: Creighton persists 595 Origyptian 06-May-16 13:04
Re: Creighton persists 546 Martin Stower 06-May-16 15:35
Re: Creighton persists 610 Harte 06-May-16 16:50
Re: Creighton persists 592 Jon Ellison 06-May-16 17:33
Re: Creighton persists 529 Audrey 06-May-16 20:00
Re: Creighton persists 835 Jon Ellison 06-May-16 20:25
Re: Creighton persists 610 Jon Ellison 06-May-16 20:48
Re: Creighton persists 650 Archae Solenhofen 06-May-16 22:30
Re: Creighton persists 553 Jon Ellison 06-May-16 23:37
Re: Creighton persists 586 Martin Stower 07-May-16 00:02
Re: Creighton persists 583 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 00:33
Re: Creighton persists 654 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 01:07
Re: Creighton persists 595 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 01:55
Re: Creighton persists 455 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 02:03
Re: Creighton persists 737 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 05:06
Re: Creighton persists 489 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 10:39
Re: Creighton persists 525 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 16:38
Re: Creighton persists 560 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 17:03
Some "Engineer" 937 DScribr 08-May-16 20:54
Re: Some "Engineer" 556 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 21:00
Re: Some "Engineer" 648 Audrey 08-May-16 21:15
Re: Some "Engineer" 646 DScribr 08-May-16 21:33
Re: Some "Engineer" 614 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 21:44
Re: Creighton persists 640 Audrey 07-May-16 02:09
Re: Creighton persists 569 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 02:16
Re: Creighton persists 586 Luminescence 08-May-16 01:52
Another "Impossibility" 584 DScribr 08-May-16 21:36
Re: Creighton persists 586 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 02:23
Re: Creighton persists 713 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 05:16
my mysterious balls 652 Audrey 07-May-16 06:42
Re: Creighton persists 499 Origyptian 07-May-16 15:51
Re: Creighton persists 533 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 17:12
Re: Creighton persists 470 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 17:23
Re: Creighton persists 597 Archae Solenhofen 07-May-16 17:53
Re: Creighton persists 532 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 18:40
Re: Creighton persists 563 Audrey 07-May-16 19:30
Re: Creighton persists 528 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 20:11
Re: Creighton persists 542 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 00:06
Re: Creighton persists 601 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 01:23
Re: Creighton persists 532 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 09:48
Re: Creighton persists 471 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 11:34
Re: Creighton persists 511 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 17:32
Re: Creighton persists 513 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 20:07
Re: Creighton persists 592 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 20:24
Re: Creighton persists 494 Origyptian 09-May-16 02:37
Re: Creighton persists 453 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 10:32
Re: Creighton persists 554 Origyptian 09-May-16 12:58
Re: Creighton persists 600 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 13:25
Re: Creighton persists 485 Origyptian 09-May-16 13:30
Re: Creighton persists 514 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 13:33
Re: Creighton persists 510 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 20:44
Re: Creighton persists 552 Origyptian 08-May-16 15:31
Re: Creighton persists 453 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 16:17
Failure to acept the facts persists 542 DScribr 08-May-16 22:11
Re: Failure to acept the facts persists 602 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 22:26
Re: Failure to acept the facts persists 562 DScribr 09-May-16 00:29
Re: Creighton persists 521 Audrey 08-May-16 17:37
Re: Creighton persists 598 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 18:30
Re: Creighton persists 556 Audrey 08-May-16 18:52
Re: Creighton persists 627 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 20:13
Re: Creighton persists 509 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 20:20
Re: Creighton persists 555 Audrey 08-May-16 20:35
Re: Creighton persists 570 Archae Solenhofen 08-May-16 22:05
Re: Creighton persists 521 Audrey 08-May-16 23:05
Re: Creighton persists 515 Archae Solenhofen 09-May-16 00:11
Re: Creighton persists 574 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 00:35
Re: Creighton persists 474 Corpuscles 09-May-16 01:28
Re: Creighton persists 590 Origyptian 09-May-16 17:15
Re: Creighton persists 536 Corpuscles 09-May-16 19:40
Re: Creighton persists 491 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 20:02
Re: Creighton persists 544 Origyptian 09-May-16 21:25
Re: Creighton persists 638 Martin Stower 09-May-16 22:16
Re: Creighton persists 579 Origyptian 09-May-16 23:06
Re: Creighton persists 591 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 23:33
Re: Creighton persists 545 Martin Stower 09-May-16 23:41
Re: Creighton persists 581 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 23:45
Re: Creighton persists 615 Martin Stower 09-May-16 23:58
Re: Creighton persists 514 Jon Ellison 10-May-16 01:05
Re: Creighton persists 549 Martin Stower 10-May-16 19:32
Re: Creighton persists 597 Origyptian 10-May-16 20:31
Re: Creighton persists 567 Martin Stower 10-May-16 20:45
What Standards? 469 DScribr 10-May-16 02:37
Re: Creighton persists 451 Jon Ellison 10-May-16 14:45
Re: Creighton persists 503 Origyptian 10-May-16 14:53
Re: Creighton persists 571 Jon Ellison 10-May-16 15:00
Re: Creighton persists 587 Audrey 11-May-16 00:53
Re: Creighton persists 631 Martin Stower 11-May-16 01:43
Also . . . 561 Martin Stower 11-May-16 09:19
Re: Creighton persists 562 Origyptian 11-May-16 03:14
Re: Creighton persists 724 Martin Stower 11-May-16 10:17
Re: Creighton persists 641 Corpuscles 11-May-16 10:53
Re: Vessel manufacture 738 Thanos5150 11-May-16 17:24
Re: Vessel manufacture 487 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 18:11
Re: Vessel manufacture 742 Thanos5150 11-May-16 19:30
Re: Vessel manufacture 494 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:02
Re: Vessel manufacture 454 Thanos5150 11-May-16 20:26
Re: Vessel manufacture 508 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 20:36
Re: Vessel manufacture 530 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:58
Re: Vessel manufacture 486 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 21:07
Re: Vessel manufacture 487 Thanos5150 11-May-16 21:18
Re: Vessel manufacture 529 Origyptian 11-May-16 21:35
Re: Vessel manufacture 498 Thanos5150 11-May-16 21:49
Re: Vessel manufacture 428 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 21:58
Re: Vessel manufacture 486 Thanos5150 11-May-16 22:02
Re: Vessel manufacture 559 Origyptian 11-May-16 22:25
Re: Vessel manufacture 442 Origyptian 11-May-16 22:19
Re: Vessel manufacture 471 Origyptian 11-May-16 22:03
Re: Vessel manufacture 592 Thanos5150 11-May-16 22:15
Re: Vessel manufacture 508 Origyptian 11-May-16 22:26
Re: Vessel manufacture 494 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 21:41
Re: Vessel manufacture 461 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:41
Re: Vessel manufacture 458 Thanos5150 11-May-16 20:55
Re: Vessel manufacture 477 Origyptian 11-May-16 21:07
Re: Vessel manufacture 421 Audrey 11-May-16 21:12
Re: Vessel manufacture 468 Thanos5150 11-May-16 21:20
Re: Vessel manufacture 518 Origyptian 11-May-16 21:44
Re: Vessel manufacture 489 Thanos5150 11-May-16 21:58
Re: Vessel manufacture 518 Origyptian 11-May-16 22:23
Re: Vessel manufacture 504 Thanos5150 11-May-16 22:41
Re: Vessel manufacture 572 Audrey 11-May-16 21:56
Re: Vessel manufacture 454 Thanos5150 11-May-16 22:08
Re: Vessel manufacture 441 Thanos5150 11-May-16 21:35
Re: Vessel manufacture 456 Audrey 11-May-16 22:40
Re: Vessel manufacture 447 Thanos5150 11-May-16 22:44
Re: Vessel manufacture 479 Audrey 11-May-16 23:13
Re: Vessel manufacture 475 Thanos5150 12-May-16 00:26
Re: Vessel manufacture 434 Corpuscles 12-May-16 00:41
Re: Vessel manufacture 512 Thanos5150 12-May-16 01:13
Re: Vessel manufacture 520 Corpuscles 12-May-16 02:32
Re: Vessel manufacture 703 Thanos5150 12-May-16 06:10
Re: Vessel manufacture 557 Audrey 12-May-16 01:22
Re: Vessel manufacture 500 Thanos5150 12-May-16 01:52
Re: Vessel manufacture 470 Origyptian 12-May-16 02:26
Re: Vessel manufacture 397 Thanos5150 12-May-16 02:52
Re: Vessel manufacture 474 Martin Stower 12-May-16 21:22
Re: Vessel manufacture 482 Jon Ellison 12-May-16 02:01
Re: Vessel manufacture 423 Origyptian 12-May-16 02:20
Re: Vessel manufacture 468 Martin Stower 13-May-16 00:25
Re: Vessel manufacture 615 Martin Stower 12-May-16 13:23
Re: Vessel manufacture 520 Harte 12-May-16 22:15
Re: Vessel manufacture 460 Martin Stower 12-May-16 23:38
Re: Vessel manufacture 457 Thanos5150 13-May-16 00:28
Re: Vessel manufacture 458 Audrey 11-May-16 20:07
Re: Vessel manufacture 713 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:35
Re: Vessel manufacture 400 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:19
Re: Vessel manufacture 464 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 20:26
Re: Vessel manufacture 491 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:39
Re: Vessel manufacture 492 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 20:42
Re: Vessel manufacture 437 Origyptian 11-May-16 20:48
Re: Vessel manufacture 608 Corpuscles 11-May-16 23:52
Re: Vessel manufacture 595 Thanos5150 12-May-16 05:39
Re: Vessel manufacture 443 Corpuscles 12-May-16 08:12
Re: Vessel manufacture 452 DScribr 12-May-16 03:08
Re: Vessel manufacture 694 Audrey 11-May-16 19:55
Re: Vessel manufacture 517 Thanos5150 11-May-16 20:07
Re: Vessel manufacture 614 Origyptian 11-May-16 19:58
Re: Vessel manufacture 414 Corpuscles 11-May-16 23:25
Re: Vessel manufacture 467 Thanos5150 12-May-16 01:06
Re: Vessel manufacture 534 Audrey 12-May-16 01:47
Re: Vessel manufacture 438 Thanos5150 12-May-16 02:18
Re: Vessel manufacture 463 Martin Stower 13-May-16 00:03
Re: Vessel manufacture 536 Origyptian 12-May-16 02:34
Re: Vessel manufacture 479 Corpuscles 12-May-16 03:12
Re: Vessel manufacture 483 Thanos5150 12-May-16 04:05
Re: Vessel manufacture 463 Origyptian 12-May-16 04:23
Re: Vessel manufacture 522 Corpuscles 12-May-16 04:31
Re: Vessel manufacture 467 Audrey 12-May-16 06:44
Re: Vessel manufacture 428 Origyptian 12-May-16 04:16
Re: Vessel manufacture 554 Corpuscles 12-May-16 04:52
Re: Vessel manufacture 489 Origyptian 12-May-16 13:35
Re: Vessel manufacture 475 Martin Stower 12-May-16 21:49
Re: Vessel manufacture 475 Origyptian 12-May-16 22:07
Re: Vessel manufacture 474 Martin Stower 12-May-16 23:15
Re: Vessel manufacture 582 Origyptian 13-May-16 03:46
Re: Vessel manufacture 466 Martin Stower 13-May-16 18:31
Re: Vessel manufacture 394 DScribr 12-May-16 02:58
Re: Creighton persists 467 Martin Stower 12-May-16 11:42
Re: Creighton persists 449 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 11:00
Re: Creighton persists 480 Audrey 11-May-16 15:55
Re: Creighton persists 507 Jon Ellison 11-May-16 16:39
Re: Creighton persists 519 Audrey 09-May-16 01:44
Re: Creighton persists 568 Merrell 08-May-16 20:16
Re: Creighton persists 547 Audrey 08-May-16 20:36
Re: Creighton persists 573 Merrell 08-May-16 21:07
Re: Creighton persists 452 Audrey 08-May-16 21:10
Re: Creighton persists 555 Merrell 08-May-16 21:38
Re: Creighton persists 514 Audrey 08-May-16 21:59
Re: Creighton persists 505 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 21:27
Re: Creighton persists 517 Audrey 08-May-16 21:34
Re: Creighton persists 408 Origyptian 09-May-16 03:07
Re: Creighton persists 544 Audrey 09-May-16 03:18
Re: Creighton persists 476 Origyptian 09-May-16 04:06
Re: Creighton persists 527 Audrey 09-May-16 05:07
Re: Creighton persists 539 Origyptian 09-May-16 13:06
Re: Creighton persists 537 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 12:00
Re: Creighton persists 423 Origyptian 09-May-16 13:17
Re: Creighton persists 500 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 13:29
Re: Creighton persists 476 DScribr 09-May-16 13:30
Re: Creighton persists 502 Origyptian 09-May-16 02:09
Re: Creighton persists 501 Origyptian 09-May-16 01:49
Re: Creighton persists 571 Origyptian 08-May-16 02:13
Re: Creighton persists 320 Origyptian 08-May-16 02:07
Re: Drill baby drill.... 591 Thunderbird 08-May-16 02:41
Re: Drill baby drill.... 749 Origyptian 08-May-16 03:23
Re: Drill baby drill.... 615 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 11:38
We've been thru this 100 times. 471 DScribr 09-May-16 00:41
Re: We've been thru this 100 times. 620 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 01:00
Re: Drill baby drill.... 761 Harte 08-May-16 19:35
Re: Drill baby drill.... 538 DScribr 09-May-16 00:45
Re: Drill baby drill.... 551 Origyptian 09-May-16 02:14
Re: OK. ..let's do some flooring now 602 Thunderbird 08-May-16 19:41
Re: OK. ..let's do some flooring now 571 Audrey 08-May-16 20:49
Re: OK. ..let's do some flooring now 556 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 20:55
Re: OK. ..let's do some flooring now 447 Audrey 08-May-16 21:09
Re: OK. ..let's do some flooring now 441 Jon Ellison 08-May-16 21:14
Re: OK. ..let's do some flooring now 535 Audrey 08-May-16 21:22
Too much interpretation 483 DScribr 09-May-16 00:36
Re: Too much interpretation 448 Jon Ellison 09-May-16 00:41
Refusal Persists 462 DScribr 09-May-16 00:21
Re: Creighton persists 450 Audrey 07-May-16 02:02
Re: Creighton persists 549 Jon Ellison 07-May-16 02:55
Re: Creighton persists 560 Audrey 07-May-16 04:14
Re: Creighton persists 521 Origyptian 06-May-16 18:21
Re: Creighton persists 451 Audrey 06-May-16 19:03
Re: Creighton persists 608 Martin Stower 07-May-16 01:00
Re: Creighton persists 506 Origyptian 06-May-16 20:12
Logic rarely persists here. 580 DScribr 08-May-16 20:40
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 527 Corpuscles 08-May-16 21:51
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 548 Origyptian 09-May-16 03:20
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 508 Harte 09-May-16 21:18
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 526 DScribr 10-May-16 02:23
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 671 Corpuscles 10-May-16 03:11
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 548 DScribr 10-May-16 03:38
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 575 Corpuscles 10-May-16 03:54
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 502 DScribr 10-May-16 13:42
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 581 Harte 10-May-16 10:03
Re: Logic rarely persists here. 504 Jon Ellison 10-May-16 10:06