I will once I've read the book, don't worry. Rather than scraps and fragments and threads on here, he has a full book in which to make his case - and (I could be wrong) I hope he makes a *comprehensive* case - and given that it is through a proper publisher and not one of these latterday vanity, do-it-yourself, self-published efforts that seem to be flooding Amazon these days, I would hope that both the reading quality and the general historical "compliance" standards are what one would expect in a properly published book. He's set himself a task, and obviously the main way he intends to achieve this is through a full book - if he can't present and argue his case convincingly inn a full length work, then I think it will be time for him to admit defeat.
If he does fail - in my opinion at least - I'll be first to let you know. I'm pretty honest and can be quite the blunt critic. But I need to read the book first.
I need to read the book first. Unlike some of you on here, apparently.
You quoted my entire post but seemed to have *read* none of it.