> Calling that magnificent ancient masonry "innate"
> or "natural" to basic human behavior totally
> contradicts the obvious fact that it is anything
> but innate, obvious, or even
> If such construction was so innate and natural to
> the genome that built it, then those genes weren't
There is absolutely nothing about that masonry that is innate, natural, logical, pragmatic or practical from any known human perspective.
Therefore it isn't human, or if it is human, we have no understanding of the purpose, science and technology that dictated and underpinned the inexplicable construction techniques we clearly see before us today.