> You can't even see that you are arguing against
> aliens because you know there isn't enough
> evidence to support their existence in the past,
> present, or future (there are no time traveling
> aliens either).
You are so sure of what I can or cannot see yet you are oblivious to what has actually been said and why. To put it simply, you have no idea what you are talking about yet you still feel qualified to offer an opinion anyways. The bane of our species in general. Can you quote me anywhere ever in any thread, most importantly this one, where I have "argued against aliens" if only the opposite? In this thread I have not said a word about the subject and have only focused on taking Laird to task for his self-serving misrepresentation of the facts. Nothing more, nothing less. And yet despite your ignorance of the conversation, it is the simple fact I am contradicting Laird at all this somehow means to you: "You can't even see that you are arguing against aliens because you know there isn't enough evidence to support their existence in the past, present, or future (there are no time traveling aliens either).. No to mention all the rest of your accompanying drivel.
Willful. Ignorance. You see nothing but what you want to see and have no interest in making the effort to actually know what the facts are particularly when they contradict your beliefs. You make the nonsensical claim it is I somehow who "already knows the correct interpretation of the evidence" yet in the same breath you do so yourself despite the fact you do not even know what the evidence is. And this is ok with you?
> Just denying other peoples' points will lead
And where does pathologically talking out one's ass take us?
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 04-Apr-16 22:40 by Thanos5150.