Jon Ellison Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The number one paradox, irrespective of the
> impossibility of achieving this work is WHY?
> Why would engineers and artisans who were clearly
> accomplished masters of efficient three
> dimensional design and construction deliberately
> and intentionally choose to adopt a construction
> technique that is so difficult to design, plan,
> measure, mark out, cut, place and position that it
> today confounds modern engineers and masons.
> What was their reason for adopting this method? If
> they were using anything approaching known cutting
> and construction techniques then they certainly
> weren't trying to make life easy for themselves.
> What could have been the design criteria that
> forced this approach?
> How they achieved it is academic and possibly will
> never be known.
> WHY did they do it? Why did they build a wall and
> why did they use this method?

It's been said that many of the formations we see in the Andes, like upside down stairways, faux doorways cut into a mountainside as if the igneous rock was butter, sharp inside corners, look like the work of children playing with high tech tools. It's almost what we'd expect a synthetic "Human 1.0" to do fresh off the first generation assembly line. And then "Oops, back to the drawing board" and out pops "Human 2.0" and so on until a self-sustainable model is finally achieved. Then, once the design seems relatively stable, there's only a need to stop back to the lab every few millennia to make sure the concoction of organicware continues to brew according to plan...




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06-Apr-16 00:06 by Origyptian.