> If he can't handle criticism he shouldn't
> advertise it here. I have no intention of
> pampering every author and video maker on this
> board (and there be many). He's given no
> indication of a "deeper support base of
> knowledge". I would say he's done the opposite by
> ignoring questions.
I actually really enjoy criticism. I'll get to all of the questions, I'm simply extremely busy this week. This weekend should free up some time. I'm Vice-President of my Fire Department's Association, an active firefighter, on the Health and Safety Committee, Fire Prevention Committee, and responsible for leading upcoming medical and firefighter survival training. On top of that I'm currently doing graduate work in history at U of T in Toronto (in fact I leave in a few hours again..a 4 hour drive, done weekly on Tuesdays), and have some deadlines this week. Plus my wife is now 5 months pregnant. Add the time required for these podcasts, and I'm pretty insanely busy.
> Take for example the Princess in a box. She was
> found in the Department of Anatomy, Qasr el Aini
> Medical faculty, Cairo University, in a box
> labeled "Skull of a young woman, a princess of
> the third dynasty”. For some reason it is
> said she was found in Djosers. But I'll bet the
> ranch the box was not labeled "Djoser's pyramid".
> So Professor Strouhal scientifically tests these
> remains and finds they are of a 16 yr old dating
> to 3532bc-2878bc, 300 years before the 3rd dyn.
> Pete's video lacks detail, he speaks in
> generalities and makes no mention of scientific
I specifically made an attempt to reference only evidence for primary burials in a general study of the pyramids as a whole. This example is not included, and again to go over each find in its full scientific detail would take at least an hour per example. You're absolutely welcome to create videos of your own.
> Intrusive burials prove one thing..... others
> found a way in. It does not show original intent.
As I mentioned in the video, there is no way to PROVE anything. All you can do is collect evidence. Intrusive burials ARE EVIDENCE that the ancient Egyptians associated them with a funerary function. Otherwise they would not have intrusive burials.
> So you must have know Pete online since he was in
> diapers, he looks to be all of 30. I don't see as
> how you are involved in the same way I am. I'm an
> alt and you sound totally mainstream.
Since 1997, actually, and I'm 35. Nov 12, 1980. Avry, Don Barone, myself, and a few others still kicking around here were very active in circle of debate from around 1997 onward. TrueOrigins.net was my website. When the wayback machine is working again, give it a peak. You'll be pretty shocked by my position, which began to slowly shift around 2001 or so. There is no reason my opinion wouldn't change again if I felt the evidence warranted it.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09-Feb-16 18:25 by Pete Vanderzwet.