It's Hancock's claim that I refute, remember? Therefore, Hancock's source is the pivotal one, not your opinion of whether Hancock knows what he's talking about here (there's no way to know if he lied purposefully or just copied other fringe writer's claims, like he did in most of FOTG.)
No, I do not know what Hancock's claim is nor do I care. Whatever he claimed about the mammoths you assert are "falsehoods" & "easily refuted" but you do not say why or how.
If you choose to believe the mainstream consensus on C14 without question it is your prerogative. There are other factors involved with the mammoths besides C14, but all you mentioned was "original reports". That you do not consider the other evidence only shows me that your study is narrow and incomplete.
You know what the black mat is made from don't you?
You realize it's not made from cold, right?
If I didn't have knowledge of it, I wouldn't bring it up. The black mat is also not a closed case. It seems you prefer quick easy answers, so no wonder you have already turned a deaf ear to this subject also.
This is BS. You pounce on an alt board making declarations of frozen mammoths being refuted when no such thing has happened. The evidence is readily available, I don't need to present it. I'm not doing the work for you. Besides, the evidence is too vast and detailed to present in this thread. I cannot condense entire books into a couple of paragraphs. Catastrophic events are being studied, events that would thoroughly explain frozen mammoths. I have no need to remove you from your adherence to the status quo. My only job is to show you are a mainstream clone and there is data out there if anyone wishes to inquire. I could turn around and say it is your job to back up the claim or refutation or concede that it is wrong.Quote
Also, it was you that made the claim. It is your job to back it up, or concede that it's wrong.
Making a declaration that frozen mammoths are disproved by C14 is simplistic and will not hold water on this board. At the heart of the matter are the theories that a cosmic event caused extinctions as recently as 13,000 yrs ago. This is not acceptable to mainstream. I guarantee you will not have the last word on this board on impact events, extinctions and frozen mammoths. Do you think the alts are stupid Hancock worshippers who don't do their own research?