Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Freya Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Pluto however had to little mass to explain the
> anomaly so it never was resolved and the question
> about one or more heavy bodies has since
> remained.
>
Although the question does remain, the anomalies in Uranus' orbit were eventually explained:

Clyde Tombaugh's discovery of Pluto in 1930 appeared to validate Lowell's hypothesis, and Pluto was officially named the ninth planet. In 1978, Pluto was conclusively determined to be too small for its gravity to affect the giant planets, resulting in a brief search for a tenth planet. The search was largely abandoned in the early 1990s, when a study of measurements made by the Voyager 2 spacecraft found that the irregularities observed in Uranus's orbit were due to a slight overestimation of Neptune's mass.

Wiki

Harte



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 23-Jan-16 16:55 by Harte.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
SItchin was right ? - to the delight of his followers 2087 Vanya 13-Dec-15 10:59
Re: SItchin was right ? - to the delight of his followers 764 laughin 13-Dec-15 14:59
Re: SItchin was right ? - to the delight of his followers 608 Eddie Larry 13-Dec-15 15:01
Re: SItchin was right ? - to the delight of his followers 393 D-Archer 22-Jan-16 11:16
Re: SItchin was right ? - to the delight of his followers 660 michael seabrook 13-Dec-15 15:37
Re: SItchin was right ? - to the delight of his followers 486 Thanos5150 14-Dec-15 01:13
Re: SItchin was right ? - to the delight of his followers 575 carolb 14-Dec-15 19:35
Gotta come up with better name. Nine?? 458 David L 22-Jan-16 13:21
Re: SItchin was right ? - more fuel to the discussion 520 Vanya 17-Dec-15 19:13
Re: SItchin was right ? - to the delight of his followers 423 Thanos5150 21-Jan-16 22:54
Re: SItchin was right ? - to the delight of his followers 544 Freya 22-Jan-16 02:58
Re: SItchin was right ? - to the delight of his followers 439 D-Archer 22-Jan-16 11:26
Re: SItchin was right ? - to the delight of his followers 458 Harte 23-Jan-16 16:54
Re: SItchin was right ? - to the delight of his followers 406 Freya 24-Jan-16 20:30
Re: SItchin was right ? - to the delight of his followers 481 atul.seth 26-Jan-16 20:25
Re: SItchin was right ? - to the delight of his followers 482 Mdsign 04-Feb-16 10:20


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.