Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
I understand your conclusion...just comes down to whether one comes to believe one or the other. What is your opinion on Puma Punku stones Martin? As per a different thread, I wonder if some of those blocks weren't indeed some kind of poured mold. ? Your 'side' if I can call it that, would have us believe that it was done with some kind of pounder/abrasive sort of tool to create. If I understand you anyways...
I take it you've watched Dunn's video's. Interesting how we came to such vastly different conclusions ie:
yours: Dunn is clearly wrong and completed with low tech etc.
mine: Dunn completed 3 different types of tech and viewed under high power'd magnification and conclusion was cut by a saw.
Dunn's a great thinker...hard to think out of the box and rare to find someone who does - and with logical/scientific supported reasoning.
I take it you've watched Dunn's video's. Interesting how we came to such vastly different conclusions ie:
yours: Dunn is clearly wrong and completed with low tech etc.
mine: Dunn completed 3 different types of tech and viewed under high power'd magnification and conclusion was cut by a saw.
Dunn's a great thinker...hard to think out of the box and rare to find someone who does - and with logical/scientific supported reasoning.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.