Gunpowder, Treason & Plot :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
This is the board for you if you wish to discuss or explore conspiracies of any kind, historical or current. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Go to: Forum HomeBoardNew Topic

Current Page: 4 of 166
Results 91 - 120 of 4951
7 months ago
D-Archer
nescience
Forum: Science & Space
7 months ago
D-Archer
Spinach was always advised not to eat too much, already because of the nitrates. Also it should be eaten with a bit bread and boiled eggs to help digestion (and the kidneys). Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
7 months ago
D-Archer
They can't ban spinach. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
The answer is one. Regards, Daniel Archer
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
Yes, you get it, gas giants are older stars. The crust we have forming during water world stage (this is after gas dwarf). Expanding earth is possible within stellar metamorphosis, because the first crust that forms is likely a complete shell, with a still very thick atmosphere and water above it, this pressure lets up over time, when the atmosphere and water layers thins the crust expand
Forum: Paranormal & Supernatural
8 months ago
D-Archer
Miles Mathis: -Mandela > -Dolly's braces> Quote: "and others claim it is a sign of parallel universes or other strange anomalies. As usual, I have a third explanation, which is the correct one: you are being fucked with by both sides. " Regards, Daniel
Forum: Paranormal & Supernatural
8 months ago
D-Archer
Many people* but it has nothing to do with EU, the originator of Stellar Metamorphosis is Jeffrey Wolynski, he has written the most papers and there is a book now (still being worked on) > , *see page 39 list of people that thought about evolving stars and/or have supported stellar metamorphosis. Papers Jeffrey > My Papers Daniel > EU does not have evolving stars, in EU s
Forum: Paranormal & Supernatural
8 months ago
D-Archer
Ok, cool. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
fueled by their assmumptions, this is not evidence, pictures are evidence. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
it is only a proto-brown dwarf in the literature, that a brown dwarf will later form is an assumption based on the matter they see in the area, ie the nebula, space dust and gas. If you watch actual images, i posted one before, you see a star is forming. Pba brown dwarfs do not shine as stars, at most they shine in the infrared. This object shines in visible light and is very bright like a sta
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
8 months ago
D-Archer
Which "observation" are you on about? The 1992 paper has no observation (ie image) in the paper. The actual real observations (ie astronomical images) show a connection. You may stick your head in the sand if that makes you feel better. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
Playing the man. You all but admitted a black hole is not actually observed, we are done here. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
We should not separate the brain and the heart and the rest of the body, we are one unit, also we have an extended biofield up to a few feet all around our body that can also sense. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
It is not mathematics it is beyond that, it is an ability to predict the future , we expect something and our minds expect the most probable future.. i can't really explain it better. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
I can predict the future, i think it is a human trait, our brains are really fast calculators and we can predict a future outcome, this ability beats the odds, but it is nothing supernatural indeed, just us calculating a future. I always wanted to improve AI but i did not like my computer science study so i quit. My idea to improve AI is to have neural network brains with future predicting alg
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
NASA has an article > Lunar Polar Craters May Be Electrified, oh my, say it ain't so Sally. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
LOl, you are inferring its existence, that is not the same as an actual observation. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
- Markarian 205, a quasar physically connected to a lower redshift galaxy. - Quote: Martin Lopez-Corredoira /"Chen et al.[69] reported the observation of line shift increase with plasma electron densities: roughly ∆λ(nm) ∼ Ne(1018cm−3 ) for the HgI line with λ = 435.83 nm. The dependence is also influenced by the temperature. ] He later comments the redshift observed is not for all
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
There was no black hole observed. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
So quasars with high redshift that have a proven physical connection to a lower redshift galaxy do not exist? I think you are ignoring actual astronomical observations and laboratory work, your arguments against the laboratory work are misguided at best, dishonest at worst. Any indication of redshift within matter is enough to cast doubt on the redshift is only distance argument, and there is
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
Everything you said is unobserved. Science needs observation first, not wishful thinking based on faulty theories. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
ianw16 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > D-Archer Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > You have still not answered my questions, you > are > > dodging the issue, typical of religous zealots. > > > > Regards, > > Daniel > > > Your questions have been answered. Get an
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
You are right, black holes and dark this and that is all very unscientific. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
You have still not answered my questions, you are dodging the issue, typical of religous zealots. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
LOL, you so religous, i pity you. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
Ianw said > "We now know that they are not quasi-stellar objects. They have a high redshift because they are a very long way away. How do you reconcile this with the fact that intrinsic redshift is observed in the laboratory? and Quasars are connected to parent galaxies by direct observation, thus can not be at those great distances, how do you wave that evidence away? That w
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
LOL, there is no such thing as neutrons stars, and merges of neutron thus also do not exist. Diddo for gravitionaal waves, they do not exist. You say it is just tired light but it is not. It is the case for physical light (ie matter), light is physical and must interact with other matter by definition. This can be proven (in my opinion has already been proven) in the laboratory. Also, int
Forum: Science & Space
8 months ago
D-Archer
You have not answered my question. I give up. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
Current Page: 4 of 166