Gunpowder, Treason & Plot :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
This is the board for you if you wish to discuss or explore conspiracies of any kind, historical or current. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Go to: Forum HomeBoardNew Topic

Pages: 12345...LastNext
Current Page: 1 of 165
Results 1 - 30 of 4939
Yesterday
D-Archer
All hope is lost on this forum, the best can do is have some fun. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
Yesterday
D-Archer
thermodynamics is photons. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
Yesterday
D-Archer
heat is photons. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
Yesterday
D-Archer
Your understandings and assumptions are wrong. electricity does not move through a motor, electricity is not a thing, just a word. To understand you need to understand the charge field (ie a sea of real physical photons) and how it underlies all E/M interaction (E/M is ions and electrons). If you are not wiling to see beyond common misconceptions about electicity you will never get the a
Forum: Science & Space
4 days ago
D-Archer
An electric field is nothing more than charge (ie real physical photons) moving (in unison) in one certain direction. Anything larger than photons (ie ions/electrons) caught up in that field will be pushed in the direction the photons travel. A demonstration would be a candle flame exposed to an electric field > Light my fire (YT): Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
4 days ago
D-Archer
There are charge effects. And gravity can be explained by charge. Charge is physical photons recycled, ie taken in and emitted by all matter. But no, if this body is there (and stil that far away) it would not yet have any significant effect on our system. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
5 days ago
D-Archer
Electrons do not flow in a wire, that is a misconception. Actually electrons do not do much of anything when it comes to electricity. The actual charge (or energy or sea of physical photos) is outside the wire! The wire is only used as a primer to set up the "field"or "potential" both non physical descriptions of a physical thing. Charge flow is actually physical
Forum: Science & Space
9 days ago
D-Archer
You could be onto something... But this requires more work, i guess if you mail Pierre Marie Robitaille he would have something to say about this. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
9 days ago
D-Archer
Review this nescience > I don't image it in the forum, picture is too big. In mainstream stars are born, get red and die... no natural evolution of a hot object that shines to a colder object that no longer shines... The chart is upside down, contrived and wrong (and weird) in every direction you look, basically chaos. The strangeness comes because mainstream astronomy has stars a
Forum: Science & Space
11 days ago
D-Archer
Mainstream has no stellar evolution. But by all natural logic and Stellar Metamorphosis, stars should evolve, they are born hot and bright, and then cool and shrink over time and when they stop shining, become the planets... so the OP article/finding is not a surprise for Stellar Metamorphosis. To see the evolution of the magnetic field in video form , check out > Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
13 days ago
D-Archer
I meant stable in solar output. Our sun is also a variable star, based on the charge it receives from the galactic core and the return charge it receives from all its orbiting planets (the solar cycles are caused by planet alignments). And all stars are evolving structures, cooling and shrinking over time. The flare star stage is between red star and brown dwarf, these flare stars do not
Forum: Science & Space
17 days ago
D-Archer
My guess is the obervation is not correct, yes superflares are possible, but i think they deduce too much from too little data. Our star is very stable, this goes for yellow stars in general, when the sun cools more and becomes a red dwarf and then a flare star it could flare more and more violently, like a flickering candle before stopping to shine completely (in visible light). Regards,
Forum: Science & Space
20 days ago
D-Archer
"magnetic reconnection" is fake science, magnetic field lines do not exist in reality, thus they by definition they can not "reconnect" Regards, Daniel
Forum: Paranormal & Supernatural
24 days ago
D-Archer
too long
Forum: Science & Space
24 days ago
D-Archer
nonsense speak, nothing scientific about that statement. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
28 days ago
D-Archer
Hi Susan, ESA uses ariane and vega rockets, they range from smaller rockets to larger (like the Ariane 6), depending on how big or heavy the sattellite is. And yes, that is a lot of rockets used and most are not reusable, but reusable system are being worked on by ESA. Some countries have their own sattellites and own rocket system to get sattellites into space , but only the bigger countri
Forum: Science & Space
4 weeks ago
D-Archer
Ellyll Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > In some cases what you say may be correct, but not > always or even often, as far as I can tell. > > For instance, in our solar system the major > planets are far too aligned on the ecliptic, and > have for too low eccentricity in their orbits to > be random aquisitions. Capture mechanics incl
Forum: Science & Space
5 weeks ago
D-Archer
Yup, those to, leaf bugs, stick bugs... as obvious examples.. but humans are no exception, we too changed based on the environments we lived in through the eons. Things gets really complicated when life influences other life... Regards, Daniel
Forum: Inner Space
6 weeks ago
D-Archer
fish without eyes in underground caves is 1 example, there are an immeasurable amount of more examples. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Inner Space
6 weeks ago
D-Archer
Greenland rocks suggest Earth’s magnetic field is older than we thought: Analysis finds that the planet’s protective shield was in place by at least 3.7 billion years ago. --- My 2 cents, the Earth is older that 4.5 billions years and it has had a magnetic field for much much longer than this. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
6 weeks ago
D-Archer
They are charge structures, their very shape and construction material, creates a charge channel straight up at the apex. Explained by Miles Mathis in > Charge is physical photons, the shape causes a charge low (less photons, less charge density) out from the apex, this cause large electrons to fill in the gap (or hang around more), eventually this energy has to go somewhere, if it bu
Forum: Paranormal & Supernatural
6 weeks ago
D-Archer
First: nothing is missing. Second: Modern "physicists" are lost in their math models, they are divorced from reality. Third: The answer is light. --- Light is charge is physical photons that permeate the cosmos and connects everything. All is light, all is one. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Inner Space
6 weeks ago
D-Archer
There is no real evolution of species, only emergence and adaptation. Life response to changing environments. In stellar metamorphosis, stars evolve to become the planets. Life emerges at ocean world stages, ( between uranus/neptune size and Earth), the evolution of the star/planet is what drives life to adapt to these changing conditions. Daniel Archer, Life Paradigm > Regards
Forum: Inner Space
6 weeks ago
D-Archer
Can you show the map? Regards, Daniel
Forum: Mysteries
6 weeks ago
D-Archer
Hi Dr Trollodyte, maybe you want to give a short explanation why this was moved? The poster asks for evidence of an actual pyramid..nothing strange here metthinks. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Paranormal & Supernatural
6 weeks ago
D-Archer
"the computer’s results will be worthless.” Indeed. The basic impossibility of the superstate, ie it is theoretical only and has nothing to do with reality, will mean that "quantum computers" (whatever they are) will remain a pipe dream forever. Regards, Daniel Archer Thank me later investors, stopping investments in "quantum computers" now will save you a lot
Forum: Science & Space
6 weeks ago
D-Archer
Forbidden planets: Understanding alien worlds once thought impossible: Quote Laughlin: “Right now, everyone’s probably wrong.” --- All the confusion is only because of one thing, they assume the nebular theory is correct. It is not correct and it fails every time and fails worse with every new discovery. In this article they try to prop it up... all they do is look like a bunch of am
Forum: Science & Space
2 months ago
D-Archer
this is too long. Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
2 months ago
D-Archer
What models? Mathis has nuclear structure models that are perfectly understandable and they actually add to our knowledge of nuclear structure and how elements really combine/behave. A lot of that work was verified by independent researchers actually working with atoms in MRI systems. Further, the basis of QM is nonsencical, i guess you read what Miles wrote on that? Regards, Daniel
Forum: Science & Space
Pages: 12345...LastNext
Current Page: 1 of 165