Paranormal & Supernatural :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions of everything that might be classed as ‘paranormal‘ - i.e. not currently accepted by our modern scientific paradigm. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Go to: Forum HomeBoardNew Topic

Current Page: 5 of 104
Results 121 - 150 of 3098
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Fancy that! Creighton cropped the Khufu cartouche which Vyse drew in his journal, when presenting an excerpt from Vyse's private journal to claim that it's "odd" Vyse makes no mention of hieroglyphic inscriptions he encountered in the chambers of G1? I mean ... seriously? The lengths a person will go to in order to promote their unique and flawed BS. Who on earth buys it? In
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
LOL
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
No, no. You made the mistake - own it. What you ought to have written was: "Okay - via Herodotus we know that Cheops (brother of Chephren ) ... If you cannot cite correctly, demonstrating your understanding of the original error, in a conversation about a hieroglyphic inscription hinging on the phrase: sn-suphis', little wonder your readers struggle to understand what you are saying.
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Here: <; At the end of your opening sentence where you refer to Herodotus, you conclude by saying - "I think we agree about that." I replied, beginning by saying that I didn't agree and then pointed out to you that Rosellini ascribed the Khnum Khufu inscription to Chephren, assuming that the ram and jug glyphs must have been a hitherto undiscovered way of writing 'sn' or '
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Of course the 'king is the pyramid'. No-one disputes that the PT says this: Use this link. Click 'Look inside the book' and then, type the words king is the pyramid into the search bar on the left hand side of the webpage and you will see that there are over 20 instances where Allen translates this phrase. Stop pretending you're the person who has discovered something profound here.
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Thank you. I was initially confused by the 'mistakes' that SC repeats, like calling Khafre and Khufu brothers, and choosing to ignore the authors cited on which his own ideas are founded. Martin's application of logic helped to clarify things for me. Thank you to you both for your ongoing, valuable contributions. There are many folk like me, I'm sure, who enjoy reading your posts.
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Rosellini in English: QuoteIt is the Suphis II of Manetone, brother and successor of the previous one, which more exactly is called in the latercule of Eratosthenes Sensuphis, and Sensaophis. And this is the Chephren of Greek historians, author of the second pyramid. So, he did refer to Herodotus - the "Greek historian" and proceeded to make the same mistake, not knowing that Khnum
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
QuoteThis Cheops, the Egyptians said, reigned fifty years; and after he was dead his brother Chephren succeeded to the kingdom. This king followed the same manner of dealing as the other, both in all the rest and also in that he made a pyramid, not indeed attaining to the measurements of that which was built by the former ... and this pyramid he made forty feet lower than the other as regards siz
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Is it not just an erroneous deduction on Rosellini's part? Let me explain. Hwfw cartouche = Suphis, as Rosellini follows Manetho Khnm Kwfw cartouche = erroneous ascription of 'brother of Suphis', again Rosellini following Manetho's choice of name here. If you are not mistaken and Herodotus erroneously described Khufu and Khafre as 'brothers', Rosellini just made the same mistake. He
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Scott wrote: QuoteOkay - via Herodotus we are told that Chephren (the brother of Cheops) constructed the Great Pyramid. (I think we agree that). No, I don't agree for a couple of reasons ... Herodotus tells us that Cheops built G1 and that his 'brother' Chephren, built G2. (I use 'brother' as I've yet to verify for myself that this was how Herodotus defined their relationship. I thought h
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
I can't follow your logic.
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Scott I'm not your teacher and you should do your homework. You're the one making the claims here.
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Herodotus = Koine Greek = Χνοῦβις There you go.
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
I know. Chephren is Khafre. Herodotus knew that, too.
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
So if Rosellini recognises that Khnum Khuf was the "author" of the "second pyramid", linking this to Chephren (Khnum Khufu) and attributing it to Herodotus, why on Earth would Vyse be allegedly daubing the name of the "wrong king" in G1? Herodotus stated that G1 was built by Cheops/Khufu. He acknowledges that Khufu's brother, Chephren, ruled after him and built
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Sam Perhaps you should (re)acquaint yourself with the writings of Moustafa Gadalla, who has already published on the notion of hieroglyphs as a metaphysical language.
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Drew Clinging desperately to an idea simply because you have invested so much time and effort in it does not make it true. Your theory is predicated on a flaw. Your diagram is testament to said flaw. Sam knows nothing about hieroglyphs, either, by the way. :)
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33

Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Since you're here ... Your bizarre overlay of a cross-section of G1 over a map of the world is fundamentally FLAWED. The foundation of your entire hypothesis rests upon a diagram which has the entrance to G1 positioned on the WEST face. It is on the NORTH face. If you re-orient the cross-section to its TRUE position, absolutely NONE of what you have claimed makes ANY sense at all.
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
140. Erratum
Oh dear, oh dear ... It's like the blind leading the blind. Is Drew aware that you don't read and cannot understand the glyphs themselves but form your gobbletygook based on an English translation of a German translation of the glyphs?
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
I can imagine.
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Scott I'm referring to the 'Egyptologists' whom you claimed in your previous post are convinced by the ideas presented in your last book but whom, for reasons you have yet to make clear, you have not named. This kind of fallacy is called 'an appeal to authority'. Come on, you're better than this!
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
If this secret cache of Egyptologists who - having read your book are convinced by your ideas - convince the SCA to undertake analysis of the paint and it is tied to a date of circa 2500 BCE, will your next book be about how Vyse perpetrated the great paint hoax?
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Ah, the imaginary "secret cache". Imaginary. Secret. Handy, that.
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Hi Lee I issued 'Takedown Notices' via email to the provider, who always act promptly by investigating the claim and, when an uploader is found to be in breach of the terms of the license, the plagiarized work is then removed and the uploader contacted, I guess to remind them of the terms. However, they do not actively monitor the site themselves; I am told it is my responsibility to notify th
Forum: Misc.
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Sam You wrote: QuoteDespite the fact I predicted this anomaly and fought for years to get Egyptology to look for it ... Do you honestly believe - and worse still, expect others to believe - that thermography was undertaken on G1 as a consequence of: (1) your "prediction" (link for purpose of verification required please. Just one which predates public release of the intenti
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Hi Lee I can understand your frustration. I produce and share educational resources free of charge on a platform with global markets and all my resources are uploaded with a 'Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike' copyright license (which gives a third party permission to adapt or use my resources, with two provisos: firstly, that any such resource is subsequently not offered for sale and s
Forum: Misc.
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
'Twas referred to as a "Super blood wolf moon' by the media here in the UK, and it was indeed very red judging by the photos which amateurs took and which were broadcast on breakfast TV shows here the next morning. 'Super blood wolf moon' ... sounds a bit more sexy than a lunar eclipse and the next one won't be until 2029, apparently. :)
Forum: Misc.
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Your 'interpretation' is nonsensical. There is nothing more to say.
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
"Ten degrees hotter". It gets worse. You were claiming in this thread it was six degrees the other day. The difference between the 'anomaly' and the stones which surround it on all sides is 1 to 1.5 degrees.
Forum: Mysteries
Current Page: 5 of 104