Paranormal & Supernatural :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions of everything that might be classed as ‘paranormal‘ - i.e. not currently accepted by our modern scientific paradigm. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Go to: Forum HomeBoardNew Topic

Current Page: 2 of 104
Results 31 - 60 of 3109
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
"Many people"? Hyperbole. Last time I counted on this site, it was about 4 contributors, two of whom either wrote a book or offered their "expert" opinion on the quarry marks. Many, many more people regard the alleged Vyse 'fraud' claim as nonsense - for good reason.
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
.
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Warren, it certainly is interesting. I have a question, though: the position of the stone on the ground, which is used to suggest a subterranean level, would appear to be upside down. Are not the column's circular edges in fact the sculpted hair on a Hathor headed column, as can be seen in the hypostyle hall when one stands looking UP at a correctly positioned Hathor head? If what we see un
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Yes, it looks precisely like a navel. It is round. Like a navel. It is positioned on his belly. Like a navel. Last time I checked, a vulva is positioned between a woman's legs. Robert, why would Bes have a vulva on his belly when his penis is positioned anatomically correctly, as is his navel by the sculptor? Please just answer that question. Thank you.
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
35. Links
Malc As you wrote: "you could pm me if you like" I have sent you a PM. Matt
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Your focus? It was a discussion I was having with someone else which centres on the theory which suggests several man made structures “lock” in a time, 10450 BCE. Therefore, integral to the credibility of any attempt to debunk such a theory would be to demonstrate, as Krupp has done, the following: The position of the Sphinx is on the wrong side of the Nile At the vernal equinox in 10450 B
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
You wrote: Quote I consider it profane to engage with such people further. You are a waste of my time. For having a different opinion. folks. Yes, you read it right. God bless, Mark. Edited to add: I really would like you to elaborate on this if you're going to dismiss Krupp, though ... You did not address the other points which Krupp uses to debunk the theory, which I mentioned
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Garbage, Mark. Colavito quotes Bauval as using the word "match" and "uncanny precision". You are hand-waving. Semantics. That is not in the same book, never mind on the same page as "pseudo intellectual dishonesty." There you go again, from zero to 100 announcing that I've "shown my true colours" for proferring my opinion. I offer no apology
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
39. Indeed
Ed Krupp is one such astronomer who has falsified the OCT. With respect to your request for a citation of any "key advocate of the OCT" theory claiming a "perfect match", I knew that I had it somewhere, and here it is. It seems, according to the citation Jason Colavito credits Bauval himself as having written as early as 1994 that there is an "uncanny precision&quo
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Hello Malc Thank you for your response. You covered a range of topics and interests in your response, so I thought I'd respond generally rather than by addressing each of the points you made. I hope that this is agreeable and that you don't think I am intentionally sidestepping any particular point you might have laboured. Firstly, like you I also have an interest in the writings of Graham
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Although I watched the series of lectures delivered by David Rohl, via the trailer you sent. As interesting as they were, Rohl's revised chronology - and the case he presents for it in the lectures - is not accepted by mainstream archaeologists and carbon dating unequivocally supports the views of his critics, I'm afraid. The film is on my TBV (to be viewed) list, which seems to be getting
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Good. At least I know what page you're on.
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Evening all Are you aware that, as charming and convincing as he may appear when delivering his lectures, David Rohl's revised chronology is not supported by 2010 carbon dating results and is rejected by mainstream Egyptologists, with the somewhat notable exception of Professor Eric Hornung, Professor Emeritus at Basel university. Edited: to correct a typo.
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
The tone of YOUR discourse changed when you wrongly accused me of indirectly addressing you. Such arrogance and so presumptuous! Shake the dust from your sandals on your way out, sweet cheeks! Adios ETA: The post above was in response to one Mark has since edited the content of entirely, which originally concluded with him telling me he would no longer be reading any of my posts and it e
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Mark. I mirrored your manner, that’s all. It’s not pleasant, is it? Know thyself Mark.
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Mark wrote: QuoteNo, I did not reply to the video, let alone look at it. A shame, for it's the kind of thing you consider miraculous or paranormal. After all, I had the courtesy to watch the fat monk in a vat of oil tricking the public into regarding him as somehow extraordinary or blessed. Play nice, Mark :)
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Mark Susan had quoted my response to you which ended "It really is fascinating stuff!" Because of the various sub-threads and the fact our conversation had progressed since the post she linked, I responded to Susan and was not, as you wrongly and mistakenly believe, addressing you indirectly. I simply explained how you had responded to the material with which you were presented. T
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Mark Please drop the condescending, patronising tone: it really is unbecoming. The reason I did not discuss Fatima is because it is off-topic. I also think that the idea of a 'spinning sun' is not miraculous in nature. I do not have an explanation for it because I am not a scientist, I know nothing about meterology and weather phenomena - and, I suspect, nor do you. However, I think it much
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
The weakness in your own counter-argument is the phrase "some scholars". Surely, Christians themselves do not doubt the truth of the Bible - or do they, Ray? Do you yourself doubt that Moses led the Israelites out of Egypt? If so, you must doubt the revelation on Mt Sinai, the veracity of the 10 Commandments themselves. In fact, you must doubt every word of it if this is so.
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Thanks Susan. Mark said he thought that this was my reading / interpretation / conclusion of the ancient Egyptian pharaonic divine birth myth. He is mistaken: it is the conclusion of various eminent academics whose expertise is in the period immediately preceding the birth of Christianity, in a place that was a stone's throw from Jerusalem. If the Bible story of the Exodus is to be consi
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
drrayeye Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Matt, > > I've been working with my first ever doctoral > student in theology, recently, and I've seen a > paper he's written that shows how logical > consistency across passages is used as a > theological test for "correct" dogma. If an > interpretation is inconsistent,it is reg
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
I know very little about astrology - as for 'charts', are you referring to astrological birth charts - like, 'Your sun and moon are in Virgo'? If so, thankfully as little as Joe Average. Might I ask why? I have read a little about astrotheology, if that is what you're curious to know. :)
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Thanks for your response, Mark. In respect of wanting to know a little more about Queen Hatshepsut's 'divine birth' relief, depicted at Deir-el-Bahri, here: The "Nativity Scene" of Jesus' birth, as described in the Gospel according to Luke, also has its roots in much older, established Ancient Egyptian mythology. This is supported by actual temple reliefs and the scholarly opinion
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Ray You wrote: QuoteWe believe in the virgin birth for theological reasons: with any other reasons we'd need a theological rewrite--and even more controversy. As things stand, it makes theological sense. emphasis mine for discussion I'm curious about your intended meaning here, Ray. (1) Do you mean it makes "theological sense" not to have to debate an issue because it woul
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
On balance of probability, it is much, much more likely that Jesus was fathered by a biological man than by a Divine creator. Virgin birth is a feature common to a wide range of religious traditions practiced by ancient cultures which flourished for over a thousand years before this one. Can you, or would you, dispute or deny that other historical figures such as the Babylonian god Ea whose
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
56. Thanks
Thanks for taking the time and effort to produce and share so generously your knowledge. I have read each of your guides and find them accessible and engaging. Thank you. Matt
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Thanks for your response Mark. The "absolute equality of Mary to the apostles" is evident at the end of the Gospel of Mary itself. It's worth a read and one can only live in hope that a more complete copy of that text is discovered at some point in the future, as was the case when the cache of gnostic texts was unearthed at Nag Hammadi, complementing fragments of incomplete gospels.
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Mark You might begin by reading the gnostic gospel of Mary Magdalene. Most scholars have agreed a composition date of the second century AD which makes it at least contemporaneous with some of the datings of the canonical gospels. Information about the codex and the text of the gospel in English can be found here: Magdalene is also referenced in the gnostic gospel of Philip as Jesus' &q
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
Pope Gregory - 591 AD - misinterpreted the account of the Mary whom he declared a prostitute, albeit a repentant on, stating: "It is clear, brothers, that the woman previously used the unguent to perfume her flesh in forbidden acts..." Moron. Papal misreading of the highest order. Deliberately discrediting the important role and place she evidently held in Jesus' affections, b
Forum: Inner Space
1 year ago
eyeofhorus33
.
Forum: Mysteries
Current Page: 2 of 104