Paranormal & Supernatural :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions of everything that might be classed as ‘paranormal‘ - i.e. not currently accepted by our modern scientific paradigm. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Go to: Forum HomeBoardNew Topic

Pages: 12345...LastNext
Current Page: 1 of 14
Results 1 - 30 of 412
Today
cloister
So a scientific certainty (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4sP1E1Jd_Y&list=WL&index=133&t=0s) becomes an "unknown" when it doesn't fit but an unknown(I shall not, of course, know anything after I die) becomes a certainty when it does fit. How convenient. cloister
Forum: Inner Space
Today
cloister
Susan, you keep bringing out this "objective evidence" saying as some sort of stick to beat people with, yet when you were shown the scientific impossibility of "life" accidentally showing up, leaving only one other alternative, you just ignore it. You are either unable to learn anything new or unwilling to confront the real truth that "life" and the illusion of d
Forum: Inner Space
11 days ago
cloister
In Martin Isler's book "Sticks, Stones, and Shadows" he discusses stepped cores for the Giza pyramids with several examples including Chefren's, but I haven't come across anything in there for G11-a.
Forum: Mysteries
20 days ago
cloister
On the contrary Susan, I'm quite happy with your answer, it speaks volumes. I think I will admit a grudging respect for your tactical nous and leave it at that. Take care cloister
Forum: Inner Space
20 days ago
cloister
There are only two options Susan, and it seems you are choosing the one that is scientifically impossible, unless you know of another way? Naturally doesn't really do it for me Eddy. It's a fair compromise but I don't think that's how it could have been. Either it was one impossible accident or it was deliberate. cloister
Forum: Inner Space
20 days ago
cloister
So you concede that life may have been started deliberately then? cloister
Forum: Inner Space
20 days ago
cloister
Okay then Susan, let's try this then. Are you saying that life started accidentally? cloister
Forum: Inner Space
21 days ago
cloister
This is why I didn't tell Susan who he is, because when the science is irrefutable she will find something else to use as a get out. It shouldn't matter who the messenger is, it's the message that matters, and the science against accidental life is quite insurmountable. Susan, you criticise others for having blind faith and then your fall back on this that science will one day find the answer
Forum: Inner Space
21 days ago
cloister
Susan, The logic from the video is that to get to biology you have to have the right chemistry. It's impossible to get that in the laboratory let alone the "primordial soup". The complexity is too much for chance to have played any part, impossibly so. Basically, this is the scientific evidence you continually ask for. If chance played no part it must have been deliberate, there is
Forum: Inner Space
21 days ago
cloister
I have now read your other posts Susan, and you still don't seem to have grasped what's in the video. Just what do you disagree with? cloister
Forum: Inner Space
21 days ago
cloister
Just listen to the video Susan. It explains it very well. cloister
Forum: Inner Space
21 days ago
cloister
You seem to be having some trouble grasping the idea of "accidentally impossible" Susan. cloister
Forum: Inner Space
22 days ago
cloister
Its 22 minutes long. Basically, before you get to biology the chemistry has to be in place, and accidental chemistry of the order needed is an impossibility. The scientist in the video explains it much better than I could. There are some pauses of a few seconds where textual headings are displayed between sections of his talk, but otherwise, its all talking. cloister
Forum: Inner Space
22 days ago
cloister
Susan, listen to the whole video and then tell me how you get past the problems. I would really like to hear your considered response. cloister
Forum: Inner Space
22 days ago
cloister
The implications of the video are clear Susan, there is no possible way to get from chemicals to life by accident. It could never have happened that way. There is only one other possibility. cloister
Forum: Inner Space
22 days ago
cloister
You are quite wrong about evolution Susan, and here are those scientific facts you keep asking for to prove it. This is a link to a video of an eminent scientist explaining the impossibility of the origin of life by chance. His explanation is purely oral so you can listen to get the whole picture. The thing about this is, if not by chance then how? cloister
Forum: Inner Space
4 weeks ago
cloister
It is clearly a fox. Pretending otherwise won't change that.
Forum: Author of the Month
5 weeks ago
cloister
Martin, I have some sympathy with your position here. I also believe that the accepted view of history has some holes in it that will probably never be filled by academia. It will take outsiders to look at things with fresh eyes in order to see the truth, sometimes. But academia does some great work too, it's mostly in interpretation where things go wrong in my opinion, and you seem to be going d
Forum: Author of the Month
5 weeks ago
cloister
Thanks for that Martin. To be honest I'm not too convinced by your answers there. It's difficult to see how you can make much of a claim for statistics from such a small sample size. Calling alternative opinions "irrational" is a bit of a stretch too, and swapping the symbol/constellation arrangements while calling attention to the similarities of a 7000 year difference between the ca
Forum: Author of the Month
5 weeks ago
cloister
Hello Martin I have some opening questions for you from the article posted by Graham ( ) There are many carved pillars at Gobleki Tepi, why have you concentrated on 43 and what do the others represent? Given that representations of animals could have other meanings or simply be artistic, why do you believe your interpretation is the correct one. Couldn't you be imposing an interpretation w
Forum: Author of the Month
2 months ago
cloister
I think that sometimes it's easy to get the motive behind a post all wrong and to take it a bit too seriously. I seem to have done just that. Again, apologies. cloister
Forum: Mysteries
2 months ago
cloister
After reading this thread I believe I may have misjudged you in the past Thanos, if so I apologise. cloister
Forum: Mysteries
2 months ago
cloister
We both know you study these videos Ian, so summarise them yourself. This is the very latest one so be careful, it's still wet.
Forum: Science & Space
2 months ago
cloister
I've given you plenty of science to look at Ian, but all you want to do is throw stones and act superior. Is that why you come on here?
Forum: Science & Space
2 months ago
cloister
Here you are Ian, your next lesson from the EU. Try to keep up now.
Forum: Science & Space
2 months ago
cloister
Eddie Larry Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > “So, ignore the science and post meaningless > drivel! It's not like you've got any science to > offer, is it (rhetorical)? Same old EU crankery - > no science, so just try to poke holes in real > science, despite not having the foggiest clue > about any of it, due to it being far too difficult
Forum: Science & Space
2 months ago
cloister
ianw16 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > cloister Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > What is most certainly expanding is the amount > of > > guff posing as the interpretation of actual > > observations. > > > > Just how and why does an entire Universe appear > > out of
Forum: Science & Space
2 months ago
cloister
What is most certainly expanding is the amount of guff posing as the interpretation of actual observations. Just how and why does an entire Universe appear out of nothing at all for no reason whatsoever?
Forum: Science & Space
2 months ago
cloister
ianw16 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > cloister Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > You've built your model on sand Ian, try this > > > > > > > > > I've built nothing on sand. Scientists have built > theories and models based on observation and known > science. &
Forum: Science & Space
2 months ago
cloister
You've built your model on sand Ian, try this
Forum: Science & Space
Pages: 12345...LastNext
Current Page: 1 of 14