Paranormal & Supernatural :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions of everything that might be classed as ‘paranormal‘ - i.e. not currently accepted by our modern scientific paradigm. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Go to: Forum HomeBoardNew Topic

Pages: 12345...LastNext
Current Page: 1 of 106
Results 1 - 30 of 3157
4 days ago
Spiros
Hi, I don't think it is Gemini. I think it is Sah - Orion. We see Leo the Lion, Sek the Crocodile, Horus is the bird, the woman is Selkis, the Hippopotamus with the crocodile for reasons of depiction have been brought down to the right. The bird with the disk above the bull seems to be Arcturus. What this whole thing is doing is showing us an alignment of two stars horizontally,
Forum: Mysteries
4 days ago
Spiros
It is too early, since it does not agree with the shaft alignments. On the other hand the fact that this theory uses a relatively faint star Thuban and an even fainter star 10 Draconis to align the base of the pyramids works against it. Since the architects targeted the brightest pole region star in the KC North design it seems to be more probable that they used brighter stars do plan the orienta
Forum: Mysteries
7 days ago
Spiros
QuoteOne of the most mysterious features of Khufu's Pyramid are the so-called 'air shafts'. Below we will investigate a variation of the Orion Correlation Theory for the purpose of the shafts. We use Stellarium software and station ourselves at Khufu's Pyramid at Giza. We set the Julian date to November 13, 2553, BC. We chose the time of day so that the belt star of Orion(see Egyptian S
Forum: Mysteries
7 days ago
Spiros
Hello Brendan, I think this 2638 BC date is a dead end. It does not fit the epoch of Khufu's or Khafre's life. You can see below how the air shafts were designed at a date that matches the reign of Khafre: Your constellational analysis is valid, but it simply points to a general time of the year. What is needed to pinpoint the specific year and date it observational data of the Su
Forum: Mysteries
8 days ago
Spiros
The problem with this idea is routed in the hypothesis that the internal structure of Khufu's Pyramid only reflects astronomic data that relates to a Egypt based observer. Since I have shown that geographic data of Greece is encoded in the Giza pyramids we need to investigate a different option. This option is to keep the epoch - year range within the astronomic - shaft encoded IV dynasty era
Forum: Mysteries
15 days ago
Spiros
According to Wikipedia, the decans are 36 groups of stars used in the Ancient Egyptian astronomy. If we divide the circle into 36 equal parts, then each one corresponds to an angle of 10 degrees. If we consider on the day I was born the right time so that the angle difference between the Sun's azimuth as observed at my birth place and the meridian, is equal to the angle difference between the Sun
Forum: Mysteries
17 days ago
Spiros
Given a 9:4 base ratio and the width at the Parthenon stylobate 30.88 m derived from the photon foot we have a base area of: S1 = 30.88 m x 30.88 m x 9 / 4 = 2,145.5424 m2 The area of the Khufu satellite pyramid G1a base is: S2 = 46.275 m x 46.275 m = 2,141.376 m2 The dimensions of the Athenian Temple of Hephaestus lead to an area of: S3 = 13.71 m x 31.78 m = 435.7038 m2 The a
Forum: Mysteries
22 days ago
Spiros
mountains, pyramids, cities
Forum: Mysteries
24 days ago
Spiros
I consider the circle representing the mind and the square representing the body. This way we can consider the circle masculine and the square probably neutral. Just want to note that the soul/psyche is missing(triangle = feminine?).
Forum: Mysteries
24 days ago
Spiros
Thanks for this. Taking a look at it:
Forum: Mysteries
27 days ago
Spiros
Hello Brendan, I think the mass correlation is a bit of a stretch especially due to it being an approximate value anyway. Now I think the dimensions of Alhena could be encoded in the base length of Khufu's pyramid. You can another alignment regarding Alhena here: BR Spiros
Forum: Mysteries
4 weeks ago
Spiros
I don't know. I don't know of any such ancient markers existing on these mountains. The only thing that looks like a marker is the Delphi omphalus(navel).
Forum: Mysteries
4 weeks ago
Spiros
According to OCT the three Giza pyramids represent the three belt stars of Orion. According to my theory the three Giza pyramids represent (among other thing) three mountains in Greece. But visual distances between stars convert to earth distances when projected on to the Earth. So what happens when Orion star distances when converted to earth distances start to show up in Greece but no
Forum: Mysteries
5 weeks ago
Spiros
Hello Poster Boy, In my book "The Giza Mountains of Sinai: Uniting Sinai Giza Hellas" I demonstrate how the designers of Giza intentionally arranged the massive structures to create a scaled-down version of mountain triads in Greece and Egypt. The orientation of the pyramids was also planned so as to precisely target these holy mountains. I reveal how Egyptian Old Kingdom pyramids we
Forum: Mysteries
6 weeks ago
Spiros
Hello Brendan, Thanks for the link to your article. I find the reference to the Moon and the sanctuary of Thoth very mysterious. The stations of the Moon seems to align with the astronomic data I have been looking into. I was looking into the direction of the Moon when I was born. It seems that the Moon disk projected onto the globe casts a shadow covering around half of the Egyptian pyramids.
Forum: Mysteries
6 weeks ago
Spiros
None that I know of.
Forum: Mysteries
6 weeks ago
Spiros
17. visualy

Forum: Mysteries
6 weeks ago
Spiros
No. The Khufu Pyramid South King's Shaft slope (45 deg.) aligned with Alnilam at about 2550 BC, the time in other words that the Khafre pyramid was erected. It is this pyramid that according to OCT relates to Alnilam.
Forum: Mysteries
6 weeks ago
Spiros
The Khufu pyramid shafts have nothing to do with Zep Tepi what Bauval dates to 10,500 BC(and Bauval never claimed this). The approximate 10,500 BC epoch refers to the lowest altitude of the Belt stars due to precession and the supposed ground - horizontal orientation of the three pyramids. The 45 degree shafts angle point to IV Egyptian dynasty(Alnilam altitude).
Forum: Mysteries
6 weeks ago
Spiros
What reversal? The shape of the Giza pyramids as seen from above looking South is that of the Orion belt stars which are also South. No reversal needed. All that is needed is orientation at the epoch as seen from an observation point to align.
Forum: Mysteries
6 weeks ago
Spiros
Another idea regarding the orientation alignment of the Gizaminds and Orion is this: If we set the date to somewhere close to 10,500 BC, then if we chose the time of day so that Regulus that Bauval proposed corresponds to the sphinx is on the horizon, then the orientation of the Orion belt stars agree with that of the pyramids. The year would have to be fine tuned though. But there is a pr
Forum: Mysteries
6 weeks ago
Spiros
I agree here, the only shaft that works out it the KC South shaft and it makes sense for this to target the central star which is also the brightest of the three. Bauval resorted to the pyramid apex altitude above sea level to match the star magnitude. This does work out but the size of G3 is a problem. As I have pointed out the altitude of the Greek mountain that correlates to G3 in my theory ex
Forum: Mysteries
6 weeks ago
Spiros
I have pointed out to Bauval in this mb if I am not mistaken, that the height ratio of the two largest pyramids of Giza match the apparent distance ratio of the outer Orion Belt stars in regards to the central one. Is this a coincidence? If not then how is it that the architects of the Giza pyramids did not know the actual star positions(data)? As I have said the central pyramid angle error of
Forum: Mysteries
6 weeks ago
Spiros
The apparent azimuth between Alnitak and Mintaka at 10500 BC at Alnilam transit(upper culmination) was 50.45 degrees(Stellarium). The azimuth between Menkaure's pyramid and Khufu's pyramid is 37.77 degrees(Dash). The geometric azimuth between Alnitak and Mintaka at 10500 BC at Alnilam rise(on the horizon) was 11.52 degrees(Stellarium). The geometric azimuth between Alnitak and Mintaka a
Forum: Mysteries
6 weeks ago
Spiros
Hello Hanslune, I do present a geographic solution to the Giza center base pyramid triangle orientation in my books 'Amphion's Secret' and 'The Giza Mountains of Sinai' which are available at Amazon, but the question still stands regarding Orion. Are the pyramids designed based on Orion, orientation wise. Even though I present an accurate alternative, a star solution does exist and I will be l
Forum: Mysteries
6 weeks ago
Spiros
Merrell Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Spiros Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > > It did not align at 10500 BC in the first > place. > > Robert Bauval might want you to think that but > it > > is wrong. It has been debunked. > > As, for instance, > here and > her
Forum: Mysteries
6 weeks ago
Spiros
It did not align at 10500 BC in the first place. Robert Bauval might want you to think that but it is wrong. It has been debunked.
Forum: Mysteries
7 weeks ago
Spiros
Planck's length relates the royal cubit with the geographic Meridian foot. lp = 1.616255(18) × 10−35 m The royal cubit: 1 rc = 0.523555 m lp = 1.616255(18) × 10−35 m = 0.3087078 × 10−34 royal cubits The geographic Meridian foot: 40,007,860 meters / 360 / 60 / 60 / 100 = 0.3087026 meters
Forum: Gunpowder, Treason & Plot
8 weeks ago
Spiros
This means that we have the approximate relation: 439 equatorial square root remen derived royal cubits = 745 equatorial geographic feet
Forum: Mysteries
8 weeks ago
Spiros
Accuracy comparison of measures based on the base of Khufu's pyramid: Earth remen(square root){polar, meridian, volumetric, equatorial} 0.5230056 m 440.46 0.5238857 m 439.72 0.5241780 m 439.48 0.5247651 m 438.985 geographic foot{polar, meridian, volumetric, equatorial} 0.308184 m 747.49 0.308703 m 746.23 0.308875 m 745.82 0.309221 m 744.982 parsec foot 0.30857m 746.5
Forum: Mysteries
Pages: 12345...LastNext
Current Page: 1 of 106