Inner Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions on all matters relating to personal development, religion, philosophy, psychology and so on. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Go to: Forum HomeBoardNew Topic

Pages: 12345...LastNext
Current Page: 1 of 76
Results 1 - 30 of 2251
11 years ago
Cesar
Hi lover, thanks for the reply, I was wondering if you'd be willing to offer up any sort of hint or clue; because to hone in on your question by means of a retrocognitive telepathy (of sorts) without having an iota of an idea as towards what (in an infinite range of possibilities) one is looking for may be severely daunting to anyone trying. Even something as simple as saying if the question was
Forum: Author of the Month
11 years ago
Cesar
Hi lover, I wonder what your response would be if anyone did come foward and answer your question. Would answering your question answer your question?; or answer the root of your question to your satisfaction?
Forum: Author of the Month
11 years ago
Cesar
I've already addressed your comments in these three posts: It's really as simple as this: You've got three points placed on a sphere; in this case, the google earth globe. In order to accurately measure or depict the angle that the three points make you must have the fulcrum of the angle perfectly center, move the fulcrum and you shift the angle observed because you're looking at a spherica
Forum: Author of the Month
11 years ago
Cesar
The star your trying to match to Menkaure's pyramid; Muscida, is not a part of the egyptian bull's thigh constellation nor is it one of the egyptian's "imperishable ones", it would not have been used to mark where the pharaoh wanted to go in the afterlife. QuoteSo at the present time there are two Giza stellar alignment theories postulated, Bauval's and mine, the Cygnus one is too inac
Forum: Author of the Month
11 years ago
Cesar
Your image should look like this: Your imagery; horakhty, is distorted to make your theory appear to work. I have previous explained this to you though you seem to be ignoring it. You also seem to be ignoring the fact that your 3 star asterism is so large in the sky that it's discrepancy from the actual angular offset of the Giza pyramids consititues an astronomical distance equal to this:
Forum: Author of the Month
11 years ago
Cesar
QuoteYou are incorrect, Robert. The 45* 'Giza Diagonal' DOES exist. The 12m Khafre offset is but an 'illusion'. Does'nt look like an illusion to me, Scott. It looks quite real! I've already pointed this out to you here though. If you'd like to discuss how and why you think it's an "illusion" please by all means start a thread on the mysteries board, I'll reply to it. Furthermore, i
Forum: Author of the Month
11 years ago
Cesar
An image for reference: The green circles roughly mark 4-minutes of arc (circle radius). So if we choose to disperse the total discrepancy amongst the three pyramids we can see that they hit the mark rather well. Total discrepancy as viewed on one point alone: (below)
Forum: Author of the Month
11 years ago
Cesar
uhmm, why would they've calculated the separation between the three points based not on the separation between the three points themselves? Referring to where you say "diagonal across the site and divide by two" as referring to measuring the separation as viewed from the axis of Alnitak-Alnilam. In reproducing a stellar asterism on the ground is it not likely that they would have measur
Forum: Author of the Month
11 years ago
Cesar
Hi Scott, The expansion rate of the half-diagonals of the three pyramids indicates that your lines cannot be straight. In turn "pivot points"; likely in Khafre's pyramid, would be required. If we consider these pivots, how can they have aligned (G1 for instance) "out of thin air" if they had'nt had aligned it to a necessary axis of two points? If they had measured the angles
Forum: Author of the Month
11 years ago
Cesar
Regarding: "even if we somehow accept that they misaligned the 45* method by 55 feet over the course of the G3-G1 triple axis." For your theory on how the pyramid sizes were determined to work; we would have to figure that the people laying out the site could not determine what a length of 240 feet was, that they did not measure to check their alignment. How is this likely, Scott? R
Forum: Author of the Month
11 years ago
Cesar
Hi Scott, QuoteThe red line passing through G3 is not parallel to the other lines (as agreed) Actually; more accurately, none of each of the three lines is parallel to any each of the other ones. Quotebut there is absolutely NOTHING that dictates that from this centre (i.e. the Taylor Point), a cord could not have been stretched in this manner, producing the eventual 'gap' that results in the
Forum: Author of the Month
11 years ago
Cesar
Hi Scott, QuoteMy lines are NOT parallel. Correct; Scott, but they are so close to parallel (as they would meet at a distance so far away) that your projected starting point is not a unique location. It appears that your pyramid size proposal can be demonstrated from any of these positions shown below. Any further NE and you start getting a slight gap. and an enlargement btw, the corner o
Forum: Author of the Month
11 years ago
Cesar
QuoteWhen I look at the Belt stars on a clear night, far away from light pollution, How far? ...from the nearest major city; and from the nearest smaller town/city light source.
Forum: Author of the Month
11 years ago
Cesar
Hi John, any changes to the earth would not effect the movement of the stars themselves. Please see my post in this thread dated: 08-Feb-08 17:18 Regards,
Forum: Author of the Month
11 years ago
Cesar
Hi John, to elaborate; skyglobe is a basic precession simulator rather than a modeling software which accounts for proper motion. It is fine for learning how precession works; as well as finding out what your looking at when you look at the sky at night, but for archeo-astronomical site alignments it is not. I do hope that you intend to find this out for yourself rather than "leaving it up t
Forum: Author of the Month
11 years ago
Cesar
> I strongly beleive that the star shafts within the Queens chamber > were blocked because they are marking the same two stars > referenced in the Kings chamber but as they were seen in > 10500 BC and no longer visible as such. If what you propose were to be the case; why would'nt the difference in the angles of the two kings shafts be similar to the difference in the two queens sha
Forum: Author of the Month
11 years ago
Cesar
Their was an excavation done in the eighteenth century where upon finding nothing substantial; blasting and digging was carried out in an attempt to find something more. Here's an image which outlines some of these attempts. From Mark Lehner's book The Complete Pyramids... Regards,
Forum: Author of the Month
11 years ago
Cesar
Hi John; I've used the skyglobe software before, it is'nt a reliable source when it comes to the proper motion of stars (the amount they move in relation to space over distances of time). The proper motion of Sirius is much greater than that of Alpha Draconis and Zeta Orionis, this would account for your observed discrepancy. Rich
Forum: Author of the Month
14 years ago
Cesar
Hi Ernest, Your link did'nt work for me. Have the Kabalion in book form though.. The founding fathers mentioned what they were referring to by saying "We hold these truths to be self-evident". Here's the whole line. QuoteWe hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these ar
Forum: Author of the Month
14 years ago
Cesar
The writers and signers of such documents as the declaration of independance and the constitution (in the very existance and signing of the documents) advocated an anti stance towards tyrannical hierarchy; and while some eras of the church can also fall into the catagory of what they were against it does'nt make them unchristian. Christian philosophy (outside of what has been acted upon through t
Forum: Author of the Month
14 years ago
Cesar
Quote...I would have to conclude that god is not in the constitution for a reason.... Perhaps they had the belief that they were not god and could not speak for him; thus they did'nt dictate as if they had divine authorization to do that,.. use god as an enforcer. Perhaps they felt the body of their work would speak for what it was by what it was. Quoteit seems so simple: put it in the Constitu
Forum: Author of the Month
14 years ago
Cesar
Hi Claude, This may be helpful to you; or for your notes or whatever. I see what Gert is saying when he says heylel as morning star but what he is saying is'nt reason to say that heylel correctly translated is morning star. If the correct translation in this instance were to merely be morning star (boqer kokab) would have been used. Further; some of my research seems to indicate (despite what
Forum: Author of the Month
14 years ago
Cesar
> he chopped out and pasted into a blank volume only > the "sayings" of Jesus. QuoteI would then guess that Jefferson did this because he thought little of Jesus' divinity but rather focused on the "man" than the "god" and what the man said. Based on Jeffersons's action alone; your comment is quite like to saying that because one compiles all the writings of
Forum: Author of the Month
14 years ago
Cesar
QuoteWhile there are historical reports of a "red" Sirius, those come almost exclusively from the Mediterranean. Neither Chinese nor American (in both Americas) astronomers reported it to be red. Do you know of any documented astronomical reports from the time between Babylonian times and the first century A.D. or so which contradict these red accounts? If so (as the way your writting
Forum: Author of the Month
14 years ago
Cesar
Thanks for stopping by Pat
Forum: Author of the Month
14 years ago
Cesar
Quote Interestingly, in Witness of the Stars, we are told that Apollo means "ruler" or "judge." And in Revelation chapter 9, speaking of the imprisoned spirits, it says they have a "king" over them. And it gives his name as Apollyon. A king is a ruler, no? A king could be said to be a ruler but what about the the other stars which comprise the Castor side of Gemini?
Forum: Author of the Month
14 years ago
Cesar
Hi Patrick, I'm pretty familiar with all your saying here, I was moreso wondering if you could elaborate on some kind of "mythological evil" within the whole context of the regional mythology and star lore connected with Gemini and it's surroundings or; further, if you know of anywhere this has been demostrated. ...As as you know the picture painted by Bullinger is rather good (as opos
Forum: Author of the Month
14 years ago
Cesar
The word translated in the KJV as 'Lucifer' and in the NIV as 'morning star' from Isaiah 14:12 is heylel; which is a word meaning Lucifer the morning star. In Revelation 22:16 the translation of morning star comes from the words orthrinos aster which basically means 'morning' star'. They're meant to denote two opposing ideas while keeping the denotion of the comon meaning of "the brightest i
Forum: Author of the Month
14 years ago
Cesar
In The Nephilim.. the heavenly city to come whose height and width are equal is equated to the pyramid shape... The measure of a person typically has it that their height is the approximation of the span of the outstretched arms, interesting in of itself as this would match the height-width aspect; but what I find more interesting (when relating it to the information that's been coming up in rel
Forum: Author of the Month
14 years ago
Cesar
For those interested;.. for reference which may be useful for the current AOM discussions. Here are three texts in their entirety which can be accessed online for free which are highly relevent to Patrich Heron's book The Nephilim,.. and the Pyramid of the Apocalypse. Referenced heavily and drawn upon they are below as Bible online online book (choose format) Book of Enoch online book Witness
Forum: Author of the Month
Pages: 12345...LastNext
Current Page: 1 of 76