Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Go to: Forum HomeBoardNew Topic

Current Page: 1 of 1
Results 1 - 9 of 9
30 days ago
Scott Creighton
Quote SC: To Rosellini & Wilkinson in 1832 I'm pretty certain that 1837-1840 was still pretty much in the future. So let us deal with the state of knowledge as it was in their time, in 1832. MS: Yeah, let’s do that—so stop referencing knowledge which is post-1832, such as the jug-and-ram cartouche name not being a name of the Χεφρήν of Herodotus. What are you trying to do, Creighton? C
Forum: Mysteries
4 weeks ago
Scott Creighton
QuoteEoH: I'm not your teacher and you should do your homework. You're the one making the claims here. SC: I am actually asking questions of the orthodox position here which is completely contradictory - that is what I am trying to point out to you here. The answer to my question, EoH, is that you simply can't translate '(Sen)-Suphis' into both 'Cheops' and 'Chephren'. So, follow the lo
Forum: Mysteries
4 weeks ago
Scott Creighton
QuoteMS: Are you serious? SC: Yes. QuoteMS: Brother of Suphis (Manetho) = brother of Saophis (Eratosthenes) = Chephren (Herodotus) makes it not Suphis, not Cheops, whereas Manetho attributed the Great Pyramid to Suphis, and Herodotus, to Cheops. I’m guessing you never got round to that logic course. SC: Okay - so "Sen" = "Brother". "Suphis" = "C
Forum: Mysteries
6 weeks ago
Scott Creighton
Hans, QuoteHans: How was Goyon and Ginsells builders mark explained away? SC: Why would they have to be "explained away" by me or by anyone? Unless you know differently, these painted marks observed by G&G have no material bearing on the authenticity of the marks allegedly discovered in the 'Vyse Chambers'. Just because something is "comparable with" something doesn'
Forum: Mysteries
9 months ago
Scott Creighton
Morten Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I established that the AE recognized sideways > written numbers even when no solar disc sign was > present, and Martin found examples where the > numbers are read left-to-right. > You "established" no such thing. You made an unsubstantiated claim - no evidence to back up what you claim whatso
Forum: Mysteries
9 months ago
Scott Creighton
QuoteSC: Do you know something they didn't? Morten: Logic is King. First of all, please do clarify exactly what you believe these number signs to be? Cardinal numbers (i.e. non dates) written sideways? Dates? Something else? Secondly, you are effectively saying Gardiner et al had a logic failure. Do explain exactly how? Finally, what evidence can you present that states that the numb
Forum: Mysteries
9 months ago
Scott Creighton
Morten Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > Projecting your 21st century AD mindeset onto > the > > pyramid builders is probably not the best > approach > > here. > > To credit the AE with the ability to recognize > numbers regardless if the solar disc sign is > present is hardly a 21st century mindset. Its > logic.
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
Scott Creighton
charly Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Scott Creighton Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > charly Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Scott Creighton Wrote: > > > > > > -----------------------------------------
Forum: Mysteries
1 year ago
Scott Creighton
charly Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Scott Creighton Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > charly Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Scott Creighton Wrote: > > > > > > -----------------------------------------
Forum: Mysteries
Current Page: 1 of 1