Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Current Page: 1 of 1
Results 1 - 6 of 6
3 years ago
Martin Stower
Scott Creighton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> “We know Creighton is lying: his fingers are touching
> the keys. - Martin Stower”
A suitable heading and summary.
You just couldn’t keep it up, could you, Scott? You just couldn’t resist reposting your favourite tired old lie. You have, after all, established yourself as a career liar and defame
Forum: Mysteries
Forum: Mysteries
4 years ago
Martin Stower
Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > Some will be asking the first cogent question
> > suggested: “If he had ‘handwriting experts’
> > on board, why did he need the other people?”
>
> Why would anyone ask this? it's very simple for
>
Forum: Mysteries
Forum: Mysteries
6 years ago
Martin Stower
Scott Creighton wrote:
> MS: Brewer’s name should be in the journal, more than
> once, in the entries covering the appropriate period — if the
> story is true.
>
> SC: Agreed. Stay tuned.
Yet another of your promissory declarations. We see the sorry reality behind one you made earlier in your book — but we need constants and this is one of them: you never learn.
>
Forum: Mysteries
Forum: Mysteries
6 years ago
Martin Stower
Scott Creighton wrote:
> SC: Where do I claim this word from Vyse's private
> journal is used by me to conclude Vyse was a fraudster?
>
> MS: Now you’re conveniently forgetting your entire history.
> Don’t expect us to.
>
> Humphries Brewer: eyewitness to forgery, remember?
>
> Don’t go swimming in denial, you’ll catch something.
>
> SC: Do show &
Forum: Mysteries
Forum: Mysteries
6 years ago
Martin Stower
Scott Creighton wrote:
> MS: Why the change? I think we should be told.
>
> SC: All in good time. And certainly not 16+ years. And most
> certainly not at your insistence. Who do you think you are?
>
> When I find something that I believe to be important, I have it
> published, Stower. I don't hold onto it for 16+ years as you
> had. The only time you presented materia
Forum: Mysteries
Forum: Mysteries
6 years ago
Martin Stower
Scott Creighton wrote:
> MS: Go on, Creighton, prove me wrong.
>
> SC: I do not need to quote any Egyptologist to prove you wrong,
> Stower--how could they? The EVIDENCE proves you wrong. You
> know--all that material you suppressed for 16 years. Prove you
> wrong? You are, far and away, the very least of my concerns.
Which you prove by answering so promptly — and so, so pre
Forum: Mysteries
Forum: Mysteries
Current Page: 1 of 1