Scott Creighton Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > “We know Creighton is lying: his fingers are touching > the keys. - Martin Stower” A suitable heading and summary. You just couldn’t keep it up, could you, Scott? You just couldn’t resist reposting your favourite tired old lie. You have, after all, established yourself as a career liar and defame
Forum: Mysteries

Origyptian Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Martin Stower Wrote: > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Some will be asking the first cogent question > > suggested: “If he had ‘handwriting experts’ > > on board, why did he need the other people?” > > Why would anyone ask this? it's very simple for >
Forum: Mysteries

Scott Creighton wrote: > MS: Brewer’s name should be in the journal, more than > once, in the entries covering the appropriate period — if the > story is true. > > SC: Agreed. Stay tuned. Yet another of your promissory declarations. We see the sorry reality behind one you made earlier in your book — but we need constants and this is one of them: you never learn. >
Forum: Mysteries

Scott Creighton wrote: > SC: Where do I claim this word from Vyse's private > journal is used by me to conclude Vyse was a fraudster? > > MS: Now you’re conveniently forgetting your entire history. > Don’t expect us to. > > Humphries Brewer: eyewitness to forgery, remember? > > Don’t go swimming in denial, you’ll catch something. > > SC: Do show &
Forum: Mysteries

Scott Creighton wrote: > MS: Why the change? I think we should be told. > > SC: All in good time. And certainly not 16+ years. And most > certainly not at your insistence. Who do you think you are? > > When I find something that I believe to be important, I have it > published, Stower. I don't hold onto it for 16+ years as you > had. The only time you presented materia
Forum: Mysteries

Scott Creighton wrote: > MS: Go on, Creighton, prove me wrong. > > SC: I do not need to quote any Egyptologist to prove you wrong, > Stower--how could they? The EVIDENCE proves you wrong. You > know--all that material you suppressed for 16 years. Prove you > wrong? You are, far and away, the very least of my concerns. Which you prove by answering so promptly — and so, so pre
Forum: Mysteries