Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world.
From Earth, enveloped by stars in all directions, the sky looks the way it does and by day the Sun appears as if in orbit of Earth. It is said to be a stationary body however and indeed, the Sun is suspended on the cross... located on an outer spur, from where the spokes that divide the Galaxy radiate outward. The Galactic disc swirls around its nucleus but proper motion is irrelevant here. More rapid, observable and of relevance is the Sun in apparent transit of the Zodiac at a rate of some 50"p/y.

If Earth, together with our Sun, were in orbit of another star, there will be a hub and 90* perpendicular to the plane of its orbit, in the star studded canopy overhead, a pole -the still point around which, indirect motion of those stars MUST ensue.

an exercise: suspend our Sun from that spot on a tether, swing it (with velocity in compliance of the precession rate :o) suffice to say greater radius, would require greater orbital velocity. Its circuit is surrounded by the 12 constellations of the Zodiac, in turn within the greater Galaxy. That movement of the Sun induces perception of motion in the actually fixed stars, creating a pattern, discernable over long periods by tracking their shifting co-ordinates.

This is the missing reference frame and it is lacking in your binary considerations.

'The math', essentially communicating relationships, may work to all intensive purposes but relating what? a motion that does not take place -the perceived projected onto a motionless celestial body resulting in misinterpretation and the outlandish claim that our Sun orbits another star, of undisclosed location and consequently, absence of orbital and parameter data.

Ok let’s continue, changing star coordinates should attest the motion of our Sun & Earth around the (fictitious) solar mass... the Sun's current location, you'd agree, has to be part of a point in progress along the bogus orbit -already in swing, on the tether. For the surrounding Zodiac to proceed by, the way it does, the plane of orbit would have to correspond with the actual occurrence. Earth's orbit of the Sun is slightly inclined by comparison but an irrelevant detail.

The Sun, in orbit of the other star, will have to be in tandem with established star motion -discernible around the acknowledged EP, which correlates with the centre of Earth’s ecliptic orbit of the Sun. So, let’s attempt to apply this motion data to justify a binary... in order for the supposed orbital motion of our Sun to comply with the pattern of changing star co-ordinates, the location of the object in question has to be aligned on the plane of the Zodiac, between the North and South poles of the Ecliptic.

In this case, the binary mass should be easily detectable, just haul out and dust off the old spying tube... a bit of a paradox, since our Sun is already in that neighborhood but who knows perhaps its own Holy Spirit. Orbital dynamics dictate the Lost Star, as the governing force of our Sun, being an inner object and the star motion, likewise, necessitates it. The familiar planetary order from the Sun: Mercury - Venus - Earth - Mars - Jupiter - Saturn - Uranus - Neptune - Pluto thus, places the MBM drum roll... (wait for it)... Mystery Binary Mass!! in the space between our Sun and Mercury, which makes for a somewhat crowded locale -difficult to miss there...

It brings to mind ‘an aberration’, as phrased by a contemporary era professor in astronomy referring to Keplers’ structure of the SolarSystem.
Little wonder you receive flack, now a strike on ‘the empire’… truth could undermine an enterprise... the exulted clan should be weary of a gift horse ;-]

Your binary scenario suggests Earth’s axis is of relative fixed orientation and does not perform a 360* retrograde motion. The star motion data instead, complies with precession of the Earth and its axis orientation change can be witnessed in local SS motion: Sun-Earth relationship and accumulative time retardation / advance Solstice -eventually shifting the Northern hemisphere summers to December -the product of Earth rotating retrograde and presenting different topography to face the Sun.

The time is what it is
“every dog has its day”

Subject Views Written By Posted
The Celestial Clock 365 Walter Cruttenden 03-Sep-12 20:20
Re: The Celestial Clock 165 Dr. Lew Graham 03-Sep-12 21:51
Re: The Celestial Clock 163 Walter Cruttenden 03-Sep-12 23:33
no lost star, only knowledge.. 157 hendrik dirker 06-Sep-12 16:34
Re: no lost star, only knowledge.. 109 Walter Cruttenden 07-Sep-12 03:20
Re: no lost star, only knowledge.. 159 hendrik dirker 08-Sep-12 17:52
The solar system moves 126 Walter Cruttenden 09-Sep-12 00:20
Re: The solar system moves 160 hendrik dirker 09-Sep-12 15:43
Re: The solar system moves 105 Walter Cruttenden 10-Sep-12 07:15
It is what it is 109 hendrik dirker 11-Sep-12 23:00
Re: It is what it is 153 Walter Cruttenden 12-Sep-12 04:38
Re: The Celestial Clock 107 Corpuscles 03-Sep-12 22:52
Re: The Celestial Clock 124 Walter Cruttenden 03-Sep-12 23:57
Re: The Celestial Clock 114 carolb 04-Sep-12 02:24
Re: The Celestial Clock 73 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 19:22
Re: The Celestial Clock 146 Nolondil 05-Sep-12 23:41
Re: The Celestial Clock 75 Walter Cruttenden 07-Sep-12 20:56
Re: Yes, I get the occasional negative response 157 Thunderbird 04-Sep-12 03:08
Luna Capture 153 Dr. Lew Graham 04-Sep-12 04:00
Re: Luna Capture 130 Thunderbird 04-Sep-12 15:51
Mythology on Luna Capture 121 Dr. Lew Graham 05-Sep-12 04:09
Re: Luna Capture 188 Audrey 05-Sep-12 04:09
Re: Yes, I get the occasional negative response 99 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 19:25
Re: The Celestial Clock 146 Bibhu Dev Misra 04-Sep-12 08:42
Re: The Celestial Clock 138 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 19:39
Re: The Celestial Clock 149 Bibhu Dev Misra 05-Sep-12 08:25
Re: The Celestial Clock 139 Walter Cruttenden 05-Sep-12 19:59
Re: The Celestial Clock 87 Sirius7237 04-Sep-12 16:11
Re: The Celestial Clock 97 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 20:32
Re: The Celestial Clock, 98 michael seabrook 05-Sep-12 21:53
Re: The Celestial Clock, 116 Walter Cruttenden 06-Sep-12 06:54
Re: The Celestial Clock, 117 michael seabrook 06-Sep-12 21:00
The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 139 Dr. Lew Graham 06-Sep-12 21:16
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 151 carolb 06-Sep-12 22:49
Explain 21 December 2012 precisely? 138 Dr. Lew Graham 06-Sep-12 23:21
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 135 michael seabrook 07-Sep-12 14:13
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 102 Walter Cruttenden 07-Sep-12 21:24
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 124 michael seabrook 08-Sep-12 12:21
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 86 Walter Cruttenden 08-Sep-12 19:34
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 140 Bibhu Dev Misra 09-Sep-12 07:37
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 73 Walter Cruttenden 10-Sep-12 07:41
Re: The Celestial Clock 120 Bibhu Dev Misra 07-Sep-12 19:17
Re: The Celestial Clock 130 Walter Cruttenden 08-Sep-12 19:27
Queastion: Earth crust displacement 144 finaltom 30-Sep-12 02:52
Re: Queastion: Earth crust displacement 143 Walter Cruttenden 30-Sep-12 21:56
Re: Queastion: Earth crust displacement 102 finaltom 30-Sep-12 23:04

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.