Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
First of all don't put too much weight on the accelerations. They change depending on estimates of distance and time and frame - and will probably change dramatically if it is found that the solar system moves around a local system, and this system moves around the stellar neighborhood, and all this happens on our way around the GC, etc. (which likely means higher intermediate frame accelerations).

But more to your point, none of this is considered in earth orientation EO equations, one, because 100% of EO has already been attributed to local dynamics (torques on the oblate earth and a few thousand other things), and two because big frame motions are considered noise in the scheme of things. For example, if moving around a companion star in 24,000 to 26,000 years results in a current observable of ~50"p/y then moving around the GC in 240,000,000 years would only change EO by ~.005"p/y. So to come up with any major changes to the current inputs due to moving frame issues, would require that someone has been wrong about prior assumed inputs and values (which they are but really smart people do not like to admit when they are wrong - and most astrophysicists are really smart) or the whole theory needs rethinking (which it does but that will get you kicked out of school).

So yes, all astronomers now acknowledge the solar system moves, but no, none of it is in the EO equations, unless you get down to a micro-arc-second level, in which case it does not matter for purposes of this conversation.



“Truly the greatest gift you can give is that of your own self-transformation.”
Chinese Philosopher – Lao Tzu

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Celestial Clock 333 Walter Cruttenden 03-Sep-12 20:20
Re: The Celestial Clock 147 Dr. Lew Graham 03-Sep-12 21:51
Re: The Celestial Clock 141 Walter Cruttenden 03-Sep-12 23:33
no lost star, only knowledge.. 140 hendrik dirker 06-Sep-12 16:34
Re: no lost star, only knowledge.. 91 Walter Cruttenden 07-Sep-12 03:20
Re: no lost star, only knowledge.. 146 hendrik dirker 08-Sep-12 17:52
The solar system moves 107 Walter Cruttenden 09-Sep-12 00:20
Re: The solar system moves 143 hendrik dirker 09-Sep-12 15:43
Re: The solar system moves 83 Walter Cruttenden 10-Sep-12 07:15
It is what it is 101 hendrik dirker 11-Sep-12 23:00
Re: It is what it is 129 Walter Cruttenden 12-Sep-12 04:38
Re: The Celestial Clock 92 Corpuscles 03-Sep-12 22:52
Re: The Celestial Clock 104 Walter Cruttenden 03-Sep-12 23:57
Re: The Celestial Clock 97 carolb 04-Sep-12 02:24
Re: The Celestial Clock 59 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 19:22
Re: The Celestial Clock 124 Nolondil 05-Sep-12 23:41
Re: The Celestial Clock 61 Walter Cruttenden 07-Sep-12 20:56
Re: Yes, I get the occasional negative response 140 Thunderbird 04-Sep-12 03:08
Luna Capture 136 Dr. Lew Graham 04-Sep-12 04:00
Re: Luna Capture 112 Thunderbird 04-Sep-12 15:51
Mythology on Luna Capture 103 Dr. Lew Graham 05-Sep-12 04:09
Re: Luna Capture 170 Audrey 05-Sep-12 04:09
Re: Yes, I get the occasional negative response 82 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 19:25
Re: The Celestial Clock 127 Bibhu Dev Misra 04-Sep-12 08:42
Re: The Celestial Clock 118 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 19:39
Re: The Celestial Clock 124 Bibhu Dev Misra 05-Sep-12 08:25
Re: The Celestial Clock 119 Walter Cruttenden 05-Sep-12 19:59
Re: The Celestial Clock 71 Sirius7237 04-Sep-12 16:11
Re: The Celestial Clock 84 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 20:32
Re: The Celestial Clock, 81 michael seabrook 05-Sep-12 21:53
Re: The Celestial Clock, 103 Walter Cruttenden 06-Sep-12 06:54
Re: The Celestial Clock, 99 michael seabrook 06-Sep-12 21:00
The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 119 Dr. Lew Graham 06-Sep-12 21:16
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 135 carolb 06-Sep-12 22:49
Explain 21 December 2012 precisely? 117 Dr. Lew Graham 06-Sep-12 23:21
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 118 michael seabrook 07-Sep-12 14:13
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 82 Walter Cruttenden 07-Sep-12 21:24
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 105 michael seabrook 08-Sep-12 12:21
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 70 Walter Cruttenden 08-Sep-12 19:34
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 117 Bibhu Dev Misra 09-Sep-12 07:37
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 55 Walter Cruttenden 10-Sep-12 07:41
Re: The Celestial Clock 96 Bibhu Dev Misra 07-Sep-12 19:17
Re: The Celestial Clock 111 Walter Cruttenden 08-Sep-12 19:27
Queastion: Earth crust displacement 126 finaltom 30-Sep-12 02:52
Re: Queastion: Earth crust displacement 133 Walter Cruttenden 30-Sep-12 21:56
Re: Queastion: Earth crust displacement 87 finaltom 30-Sep-12 23:04


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.