Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
First of all don't put too much weight on the accelerations. They change depending on estimates of distance and time and frame - and will probably change dramatically if it is found that the solar system moves around a local system, and this system moves around the stellar neighborhood, and all this happens on our way around the GC, etc. (which likely means higher intermediate frame accelerations).

But more to your point, none of this is considered in earth orientation EO equations, one, because 100% of EO has already been attributed to local dynamics (torques on the oblate earth and a few thousand other things), and two because big frame motions are considered noise in the scheme of things. For example, if moving around a companion star in 24,000 to 26,000 years results in a current observable of ~50"p/y then moving around the GC in 240,000,000 years would only change EO by ~.005"p/y. So to come up with any major changes to the current inputs due to moving frame issues, would require that someone has been wrong about prior assumed inputs and values (which they are but really smart people do not like to admit when they are wrong - and most astrophysicists are really smart) or the whole theory needs rethinking (which it does but that will get you kicked out of school).

So yes, all astronomers now acknowledge the solar system moves, but no, none of it is in the EO equations, unless you get down to a micro-arc-second level, in which case it does not matter for purposes of this conversation.



“Truly the greatest gift you can give is that of your own self-transformation.”
Chinese Philosopher – Lao Tzu

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Celestial Clock 364 Walter Cruttenden 03-Sep-12 20:20
Re: The Celestial Clock 165 Dr. Lew Graham 03-Sep-12 21:51
Re: The Celestial Clock 162 Walter Cruttenden 03-Sep-12 23:33
no lost star, only knowledge.. 157 hendrik dirker 06-Sep-12 16:34
Re: no lost star, only knowledge.. 109 Walter Cruttenden 07-Sep-12 03:20
Re: no lost star, only knowledge.. 159 hendrik dirker 08-Sep-12 17:52
The solar system moves 126 Walter Cruttenden 09-Sep-12 00:20
Re: The solar system moves 160 hendrik dirker 09-Sep-12 15:43
Re: The solar system moves 105 Walter Cruttenden 10-Sep-12 07:15
It is what it is 109 hendrik dirker 11-Sep-12 23:00
Re: It is what it is 153 Walter Cruttenden 12-Sep-12 04:38
Re: The Celestial Clock 106 Corpuscles 03-Sep-12 22:52
Re: The Celestial Clock 124 Walter Cruttenden 03-Sep-12 23:57
Re: The Celestial Clock 114 carolb 04-Sep-12 02:24
Re: The Celestial Clock 72 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 19:22
Re: The Celestial Clock 146 Nolondil 05-Sep-12 23:41
Re: The Celestial Clock 75 Walter Cruttenden 07-Sep-12 20:56
Re: Yes, I get the occasional negative response 157 Thunderbird 04-Sep-12 03:08
Luna Capture 153 Dr. Lew Graham 04-Sep-12 04:00
Re: Luna Capture 129 Thunderbird 04-Sep-12 15:51
Mythology on Luna Capture 121 Dr. Lew Graham 05-Sep-12 04:09
Re: Luna Capture 188 Audrey 05-Sep-12 04:09
Re: Yes, I get the occasional negative response 98 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 19:25
Re: The Celestial Clock 145 Bibhu Dev Misra 04-Sep-12 08:42
Re: The Celestial Clock 137 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 19:39
Re: The Celestial Clock 149 Bibhu Dev Misra 05-Sep-12 08:25
Re: The Celestial Clock 139 Walter Cruttenden 05-Sep-12 19:59
Re: The Celestial Clock 86 Sirius7237 04-Sep-12 16:11
Re: The Celestial Clock 96 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 20:32
Re: The Celestial Clock, 98 michael seabrook 05-Sep-12 21:53
Re: The Celestial Clock, 116 Walter Cruttenden 06-Sep-12 06:54
Re: The Celestial Clock, 117 michael seabrook 06-Sep-12 21:00
The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 139 Dr. Lew Graham 06-Sep-12 21:16
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 151 carolb 06-Sep-12 22:49
Explain 21 December 2012 precisely? 138 Dr. Lew Graham 06-Sep-12 23:21
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 135 michael seabrook 07-Sep-12 14:13
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 102 Walter Cruttenden 07-Sep-12 21:24
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 124 michael seabrook 08-Sep-12 12:21
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 86 Walter Cruttenden 08-Sep-12 19:34
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 140 Bibhu Dev Misra 09-Sep-12 07:37
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 72 Walter Cruttenden 10-Sep-12 07:41
Re: The Celestial Clock 120 Bibhu Dev Misra 07-Sep-12 19:17
Re: The Celestial Clock 130 Walter Cruttenden 08-Sep-12 19:27
Queastion: Earth crust displacement 144 finaltom 30-Sep-12 02:52
Re: Queastion: Earth crust displacement 143 Walter Cruttenden 30-Sep-12 21:56
Re: Queastion: Earth crust displacement 102 finaltom 30-Sep-12 23:04


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.