Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hi Walter,

You have mentioned that scientists assume a "static solar system", and an "immovable sun" to explain changes in earth orientation. I am not sure I understand. Scientists clearly agree on the fact that the Solar System exhibits 3 types of motion:

1. The solar system rovolves around the GC at a speed of 217.215 Km/s.

2. The solar system moves up and down the plane of the galaxy at 5-7 Km/s.

3. The solar system moves towards -backwards from the GC at a speed of 20 Km/s.

None of these movements, of course, can result in the observable called precession. However, these three movements are acknowledged.

So when you are saying that scientists assume a static solar system, are you saying that they do not acknowledge the additional "binary motion" of the solar system that has been proposed?

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Celestial Clock 277 Walter Cruttenden 03-Sep-12 20:20
Re: The Celestial Clock 105 Dr. Lew Graham 03-Sep-12 21:51
Re: The Celestial Clock 106 Walter Cruttenden 03-Sep-12 23:33
no lost star, only knowledge.. 102 hendrik dirker 06-Sep-12 16:34
Re: no lost star, only knowledge.. 70 Walter Cruttenden 07-Sep-12 03:20
Re: no lost star, only knowledge.. 110 hendrik dirker 08-Sep-12 17:52
The solar system moves 74 Walter Cruttenden 09-Sep-12 00:20
Re: The solar system moves 104 hendrik dirker 09-Sep-12 15:43
Re: The solar system moves 53 Walter Cruttenden 10-Sep-12 07:15
It is what it is 80 hendrik dirker 11-Sep-12 23:00
Re: It is what it is 92 Walter Cruttenden 12-Sep-12 04:38
Re: The Celestial Clock 71 Corpuscles 03-Sep-12 22:52
Re: The Celestial Clock 71 Walter Cruttenden 03-Sep-12 23:57
Re: The Celestial Clock 73 carolb 04-Sep-12 02:24
Re: The Celestial Clock 40 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 19:22
Re: The Celestial Clock 86 Nolondil 05-Sep-12 23:41
Re: The Celestial Clock 39 Walter Cruttenden 07-Sep-12 20:56
Re: Yes, I get the occasional negative response 101 Thunderbird 04-Sep-12 03:08
Luna Capture 93 Dr. Lew Graham 04-Sep-12 04:00
Re: Luna Capture 72 Thunderbird 04-Sep-12 15:51
Mythology on Luna Capture 70 Dr. Lew Graham 05-Sep-12 04:09
Re: Luna Capture 133 Audrey 05-Sep-12 04:09
Re: Yes, I get the occasional negative response 53 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 19:25
Re: The Celestial Clock 79 Bibhu Dev Misra 04-Sep-12 08:42
Re: The Celestial Clock 74 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 19:39
Re: The Celestial Clock 77 Bibhu Dev Misra 05-Sep-12 08:25
Re: The Celestial Clock 85 Walter Cruttenden 05-Sep-12 19:59
Re: The Celestial Clock 49 Sirius7237 04-Sep-12 16:11
Re: The Celestial Clock 65 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 20:32
Re: The Celestial Clock, 54 michael seabrook 05-Sep-12 21:53
Re: The Celestial Clock, 78 Walter Cruttenden 06-Sep-12 06:54
Re: The Celestial Clock, 70 michael seabrook 06-Sep-12 21:00
The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 75 Dr. Lew Graham 06-Sep-12 21:16
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 91 carolb 06-Sep-12 22:49
Explain 21 December 2012 precisely? 71 Dr. Lew Graham 06-Sep-12 23:21
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 73 michael seabrook 07-Sep-12 14:13
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 52 Walter Cruttenden 07-Sep-12 21:24
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 81 michael seabrook 08-Sep-12 12:21
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 51 Walter Cruttenden 08-Sep-12 19:34
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 80 Bibhu Dev Misra 09-Sep-12 07:37
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 36 Walter Cruttenden 10-Sep-12 07:41
Re: The Celestial Clock 63 Bibhu Dev Misra 07-Sep-12 19:17
Re: The Celestial Clock 81 Walter Cruttenden 08-Sep-12 19:27
Queastion: Earth crust displacement 88 finaltom 30-Sep-12 02:52
Re: Queastion: Earth crust displacement 88 Walter Cruttenden 30-Sep-12 21:56
Re: Queastion: Earth crust displacement 65 finaltom 30-Sep-12 23:04


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.